BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38940285)

  • 1. Verbal and pictorial single-item scales are as good as their 10-item counterparts for measuring perceived usability.
    Gräve E; Bell R; Buchner A
    Ergonomics; 2024 Jun; ():1-15. PubMed ID: 38940285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is Less Sometimes More? An Experimental Comparison of Four Measures of Perceived Usability.
    Gräve E; Buchner A
    Hum Factors; 2024 Mar; ():187208241237862. PubMed ID: 38482806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of system usability scale as a usability metric to evaluate voice user interfaces.
    Deshmukh AM; Chalmeta R
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2024; 10():e1918. PubMed ID: 38435614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring Dyspnea and Perceived Exertion in Healthy Adults and with Respiratory Disease: New Pictorial Scales.
    Pianosi PT; Zhang Z; Hernandez P; Huebner M
    Sports Med Open; 2016; 2():17. PubMed ID: 26770885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dalhousie Pictorial Scales Measuring Dyspnea and Perceived Exertion during Exercise for Children and Adolescents.
    Pianosi PT; Huebner M; Zhang Z; Turchetta A; McGrath PJ
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 May; 12(5):718-26. PubMed ID: 25695139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Usability and perceived usefulness of patient-centered medication reconciliation using a personalized health record: a multicenter cross-sectional study.
    van der Nat DJ; Huiskes VJB; Taks M; Pouls BPH; van den Bemt BJF; van Onzenoort HAW
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Jun; 22(1):776. PubMed ID: 35698220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pictorial and verbal category-ratio scales for effort estimation in children.
    Marinov B; Mandadjieva S; Kostianev S
    Child Care Health Dev; 2008 Jan; 34(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18171442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Poor usability of computer-assisted navigation for hip fracture surgery.
    Hestehave RA; Gundtoft PH; Nielsen CL; Brink O; Rölfing JD
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Jan; 144(1):251-257. PubMed ID: 37878075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring AT Usability with the Modified System Usability Scale (SUS).
    Friesen EL
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 242():137-143. PubMed ID: 28873790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prototype Development, Usability, and Preference of a Culturally-relevant Pictorial Aid to Facilitate Comprehension of Likert-type Levels of Agreement in Caregivers of Children Living With HIV in Ghana.
    Ramos SR; Paintsil E; Ofori-Atta A; Kusah JT; Amissah KA; Alhassan A; Ofori IP; Reynolds NR
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2020 Jan; 38(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 31833861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Responsiveness of a single-item indicator versus a multi-item scale: assessment of emotional well-being in an international adjuvant breast cancer trial.
    Hürny C; Bernhard J; Coates A; Peterson HF; Castiglione-Gertsch M; Gelber RD; Rudenstam CM; Collins J; Lindtner J; Goldhirsch A; Senn HJ
    Med Care; 1996 Mar; 34(3):234-48. PubMed ID: 8628043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Assessment of the distance between categories in rating scales by using the item response model].
    Wakita T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2004 Oct; 75(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 15747553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychometric evaluation of the pictorial scale of perceived movement skill competence in Chinese children: An item response theory analysis.
    Li X; Su Z; Wang L; Li J; Diao Y
    Child Care Health Dev; 2024 Jul; 50(4):e13275. PubMed ID: 38801211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of affective states in adults. Evaluation of an adjective rating scale instrument.
    Usala PD; Hertzog C
    Res Aging; 1989 Dec; 11(4):403-26. PubMed ID: 2623354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usability of Graphical User Interfaces With Semiautomatic Delabeling Feature to Improve Drug Allergy Documentation.
    Muylle KM; Van Laere S; Gentens K; Dupont AG; Grosber M; Cornu P
    J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract; 2023 Feb; 11(2):519-526.e3. PubMed ID: 36581072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of Pictorial Mood Assessment with Ottawa Mood Scales and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale for Young Adults.
    Wong MY; Croarkin PE; Lee CK; Lee PF
    Community Ment Health J; 2021 Apr; 57(3):529-539. PubMed ID: 32661820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mobile health app usability and quality rating scales: a systematic review.
    Azad-Khaneghah P; Neubauer N; Miguel Cruz A; Liu L
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Oct; 16(7):712-721. PubMed ID: 31910687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Malay Version of the System Usability Scale Questionnaire for the Assessment of Mobile Apps.
    Mohamad Marzuki MF; Yaacob NA; Yaacob NM
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2018 May; 5(2):e10308. PubMed ID: 29759955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Supportive Digital Health Service During Cancer Chemotherapy: Single-Arm Before-and-After Feasibility Study.
    Fridriksdottir N; Ingadottir B; Skuladottir K; Zoëga S; Gunnarsdottir S
    JMIR Form Res; 2023 Dec; 7():e50550. PubMed ID: 38015268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does Benchmarking of Rating Scales Improve Ratings of Search Performance Given by Specialist Search Dog Handlers?
    Clark CCA; Rooney NJ
    Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():545398. PubMed ID: 33604364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.