These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38940856)

  • 1. Non-gated chest CT for coronary artery calcium score: is this reliable?
    Zhu Y
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jul; 34(7):4457-4458. PubMed ID: 38940856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of cardiovascular risk on routine chest CT: Ordinal coronary artery calcium scoring as an accurate predictor of Agatston score ranges.
    Azour L; Kadoch MA; Ward TJ; Eber CD; Jacobi AH
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 27743881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic value of visually detected coronary artery calcification on unenhanced non-gated thoracic computed tomography for prediction of non-fatal myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality.
    Shao L; Yan AT; Lebovic G; Wong HH; Kirpalani A; Deva DP
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 28411031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Clinical Applicability of Coronary Artery Calcium Assessment on Non-Gated Chest Computed Tomography, Compared With the Classic Agatston Score on Cardiac Computed Tomography.
    Groen RA; Jukema JW; van Dijkman PRM; Timmermans PT; Bax JJ; Lamb HJ; de Graaf MA
    Am J Cardiol; 2023 Dec; 208():92-100. PubMed ID: 37820552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability analysis of visual ranking of coronary artery calcification on low-dose CT of the thorax for lung cancer screening: comparison with ECG-gated calcium scoring CT.
    Kim YK; Sung YM; Cho SH; Park YN; Choi HY
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Dec; 30 Suppl 2():81-7. PubMed ID: 25084979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-pitch dual-source CT for coronary artery calcium scoring: A head-to-head comparison of non-triggered chest versus triggered cardiac acquisition.
    Xia C; Vonder M; Pelgrim GJ; Rook M; Xie X; Alsurayhi A; van Ooijen PMA; van Bolhuis JN; Oudkerk M; Dorrius M; van der Harst P; Vliegenthart R
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2021; 15(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 32505593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coronary artery calcium assessment on non-gated chest CT to optimize pre-operative cardiac screening in liver transplantation.
    Groen RA; Barbero FL; Fischer SE; van Dijkman PRM; Bax JJ; Tushuizen ME; Jukema JW; Coenraad MJ; de Graaf MA
    Int J Cardiol; 2024 Jul; 407():132015. PubMed ID: 38609053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coronary artery calcification on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of Agatston and Ordinal Scores.
    Htwe Y; Cham MD; Henschke CI; Hecht H; Shemesh J; Liang M; Tang W; Jirapatnakul A; Yip R; Yankelevitz DF
    Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(5):799-802. PubMed ID: 26068098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coronary artery calcification is common on nongated chest computed tomography imaging.
    Balakrishnan R; Nguyen B; Raad R; Donnino R; Naidich DP; Jacobs JE; Reynolds HR
    Clin Cardiol; 2017 Jul; 40(7):498-502. PubMed ID: 28300293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography: Solving the Calcification Dilemma of Coronary CT Angiography.
    Budoff MJ; Min JK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Sep; 8(9):1056-1058. PubMed ID: 26381767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening coronary CT angiography: possibilities and pitfalls.
    Yoo SM; Lee HY; White CS
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Dec; 30(8):1599-601. PubMed ID: 25026911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sex Differences in the Performance of Cardiac Computed Tomography Compared With Functional Testing in Evaluating Stable Chest Pain: Subanalysis of the Multicenter, Randomized CRESCENT Trial (Calcium Imaging and Selective CT Angiography in Comparison to Functional Testing for Suspected Coronary Artery Disease).
    Lubbers M; Coenen A; Bruning T; Galema T; Akkerhuis J; Krenning B; Musters P; Ouhlous M; Liem A; Niezen A; Dedic A; van Domburg R; Hunink M; Nieman K
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 28174196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Agatston calcium score: a milestone in the history of cardiac CT.
    Schmermund A
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(6):414-7. PubMed ID: 25467829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Value of conventional chest radiography for the detection of coronary calcifications: comparison with MSCT.
    Mahnken AH; Wein BB; Sinha AM; Günther RW; Wildberger JE
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):510-6. PubMed ID: 18055150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of the coronary calcium score on the ability to rule out coronary artery stenoses by coronary CT angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Schuhbaeck A; Schmid J; Zimmer T; Muschiol G; Hell MM; Marwan M; Achenbach S
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(5):343-50. PubMed ID: 27461528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feasibility of morphological assessment of coronary artery calcification with electrocardiography-gated non-contrast computed tomography: a comparative study with optical coherence tomography.
    Takahashi Y; Toba T; Otake H; Fukuyama Y; Nakano S; Matsuoka Y; Tanimura K; Izawa Y; Kawamori H; Kono AK; Fujiwara S; Hirata KI
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Apr; 37(4):1445-1453. PubMed ID: 33151511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coronary artery calcium scoring with photon-counting CT: first in vivo human experience.
    Symons R; Sandfort V; Mallek M; Ulzheimer S; Pourmorteza A
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 35(4):733-739. PubMed ID: 30635819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incidental coronary calcifications on routine chest CT: Clinical implications.
    Pakdaman MN; Rozanski A; Berman DS
    Trends Cardiovasc Med; 2017 Oct; 27(7):475-480. PubMed ID: 28583439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction on the reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in reduced radiation dose 320 detector row CT.
    Choi AD; Leifer ES; Yu J; Shanbhag SM; Bronson K; Arai AE; Chen MY
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 27591767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimized categorization algorithm of coronary artery calcification score on non-gated chest low-dose CT screening using iterative model reconstruction technique.
    Fan R; Shi X; Qian Y; Wang Y; Fan L; Chen R; Xiao Y; Liu S
    Clin Imaging; 2018; 52():287-291. PubMed ID: 30193187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.