104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38940961)
1. Metaplastic neuromodulation via transcranial direct current stimulation has no effect on corticospinal excitability and neuromuscular fatigue.
Boda MR; Otieno LA; Smith AE; Goldsworthy MR; Sidhu SK
Exp Brain Res; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38940961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The interaction between metaplastic neuromodulation and fatigue in multiple sclerosis.
Xian C; Barbi C; Goldsworthy MR; Venturelli M; Sidhu SK
J Neurol Sci; 2023 Jan; 444():120521. PubMed ID: 36528976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preconditioning cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates the neuroplastic effect of subsequent anodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied during cycling in young adults.
Pourmajidian M; Lauber B; Sidhu SK
Neurosci Lett; 2020 Jan; 714():134597. PubMed ID: 31689457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances time to task failure of a submaximal contraction of elbow flexors without changing corticospinal excitability.
Abdelmoula A; Baudry S; Duchateau J
Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():94-103. PubMed ID: 26892298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in Corticospinal Excitability and Motor Control During Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Individuals.
Takano K; Katagiri N; Sato T; Jin M; Koseki T; Kudo D; Yoshida K; Tanabe S; Tsujikawa M; Kondo K; Yamaguchi T
Cerebellum; 2023 Oct; 22(5):905-914. PubMed ID: 36053392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation can decrease force output of knee extensors during an intermittent MVC fatiguing task in young healthy male participants.
Giboin LS; Gruber M
J Neurosci Res; 2018 Sep; 96(9):1600-1609. PubMed ID: 29696675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of combined transcranial direct current stimulation and peripheral nerve electrical stimulation on corticospinal excitability.
Tsuiki S; Sasaki R; Miyaguchi S; Kojima S; Saito K; Inukai Y; Masaki M; Otsuru N; Onishi H
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214592. PubMed ID: 30925178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.
Jamil A; Batsikadze G; Kuo HI; Labruna L; Hasan A; Paulus W; Nitsche MA
J Physiol; 2017 Feb; 595(4):1273-1288. PubMed ID: 27723104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans.
Batsikadze G; Moliadze V; Paulus W; Kuo MF; Nitsche MA
J Physiol; 2013 Apr; 591(7):1987-2000. PubMed ID: 23339180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Quadriceps Maximal Voluntary Contraction, Corticospinal Excitability, and Voluntary Activation Levels.
Kristiansen M; Thomsen MJ; Nørgaard J; Aaes J; Knudsen D; Voigt M
J Strength Cond Res; 2022 Jun; 36(6):1540-1547. PubMed ID: 33677460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. No effect of tDCS of the primary motor cortex on isometric exercise performance or perceived fatigue.
Wrightson JG; Twomey R; Yeung STY; Millet GY
Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Jul; 52(2):2905-2914. PubMed ID: 31846516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Voluntary movement reverses the effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on corticomotor excitability.
Ataoglu EE; Caglayan HB; Cengiz B
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2653-2659. PubMed ID: 28577024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transcranial direct-current stimulation reduced the excitability of diaphragmatic corticospinal pathways whatever the polarity used.
Azabou E; Roche N; Sharshar T; Bussel B; Lofaso F; Petitjean M
Respir Physiol Neurobiol; 2013 Oct; 189(1):183-7. PubMed ID: 23933029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The association of motor imagery and kinesthetic illusion prolongs the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal tract excitability.
Kaneko F; Shibata E; Hayami T; Nagahata K; Aoyama T
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 13():36. PubMed ID: 27079199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved isometric force endurance after transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortical areas.
Cogiamanian F; Marceglia S; Ardolino G; Barbieri S; Priori A
Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 26(1):242-9. PubMed ID: 17614951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Corticomotor excitability induced by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation with and without non-exhaustive movement.
Miyaguchi S; Onishi H; Kojima S; Sugawara K; Tsubaki A; Kirimoto H; Tamaki H; Yamamoto N
Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 1529():83-91. PubMed ID: 23891715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on cortex modulation by stimulation of the primary motor cortex and parietal cortex in humans.
Bashir S; Aisha D; Hamza A; Al-Hussain F; Yoo WK
Int J Neurosci; 2021 Nov; 131(11):1107-1114. PubMed ID: 32462947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multimodal Assessment of Precentral Anodal TDCS: Individual Rise in Supplementary Motor Activity Scales With Increase in Corticospinal Excitability.
Karabanov AN; Shindo K; Shindo Y; Raffin E; Siebner HR
Front Hum Neurosci; 2021; 15():639274. PubMed ID: 33762917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability.
Tremblay S; Larochelle-Brunet F; Lafleur LP; El Mouderrib S; Lepage JF; Théoret H
Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 44(5):2184-90. PubMed ID: 27336413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cumulative effects of anodal and priming cathodal tDCS on pegboard test performance and motor cortical excitability.
Christova M; Rafolt D; Gallasch E
Behav Brain Res; 2015; 287():27-33. PubMed ID: 25804362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
