These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38941208)

  • 21. Exploring Conflicts in Whole Genome Phylogenetics: A Case Study Within Manakins (Aves: Pipridae).
    Zhao M; Kurtis SM; White ND; Moncrieff AE; Leite RN; Brumfield RT; Braun EL; Kimball RT
    Syst Biol; 2023 May; 72(1):161-178. PubMed ID: 36130303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sources of error inherent in species-tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods.
    Huang H; He Q; Kubatko LS; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2010 Oct; 59(5):573-83. PubMed ID: 20833951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A support vector machine based test for incongruence between sets of trees in tree space.
    Haws DC; Huggins P; O'Neill EM; Weisrock DW; Yoshida R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Aug; 13():210. PubMed ID: 22909268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Implications of Incongruence between Gene Tree and Species Tree Topologies for Divergence Time Estimation.
    Carruthers T; Sun M; Baker WJ; Smith SA; de Vos JM; Eiserhardt WL
    Syst Biol; 2022 Aug; 71(5):1124-1146. PubMed ID: 35167690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accounting for Uncertainty in Gene Tree Estimation: Summary-Coalescent Species Tree Inference in a Challenging Radiation of Australian Lizards.
    Blom MPK; Bragg JG; Potter S; Moritz C
    Syst Biol; 2017 May; 66(3):352-366. PubMed ID: 28039387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A stochastic Farris transform for genetic data under the multispecies coalescent with applications to data requirements.
    Dasarathy G; Mossel E; Nowak R; Roch S
    J Math Biol; 2022 Apr; 84(5):36. PubMed ID: 35394192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of a Rapid Evolutionary Radiation Using Ultraconserved Elements: Evidence for a Bias in Some Multispecies Coalescent Methods.
    Meiklejohn KA; Faircloth BC; Glenn TC; Kimball RT; Braun EL
    Syst Biol; 2016 Jul; 65(4):612-27. PubMed ID: 26865273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A fast algorithm for computing geodesic distances in tree space.
    Owen M; Provan JS
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21071792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Consistency and convergence rate of phylogenetic inference via regularization.
    Dinh V; Tung Ho LS; Suchard MA; Matsen FA
    Ann Stat; 2018 Aug; 46(4):1481-1512. PubMed ID: 30344357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent model.
    Liu L; Yu L; Edwards SV
    BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Oct; 10():302. PubMed ID: 20937096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimating species trees using approximate Bayesian computation.
    Fan HH; Kubatko LS
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2011 May; 59(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 21397706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computational Performance and Statistical Accuracy of *BEAST and Comparisons with Other Methods.
    Ogilvie HA; Heled J; Xie D; Drummond AJ
    Syst Biol; 2016 May; 65(3):381-96. PubMed ID: 26821913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Invariant transformers of Robinson and Foulds distance matrices for Convolutional Neural Network.
    Tahiri N; Veriga A; Koshkarov A; Morozov B
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2022 Aug; 20(4):2250012. PubMed ID: 35798684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the Robustness to Gene Tree Estimation Error (or lack thereof) of Coalescent-Based Species Tree Methods.
    Roch S; Warnow T
    Syst Biol; 2015 Jul; 64(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 25813358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of subsampling gene trees on coalescent methods applied to ancient divergences.
    Simmons MP; Sloan DB; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Apr; 97():76-89. PubMed ID: 26768112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data.
    Nei M; Tajima F; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1983; 19(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 6571220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. imPhy: Imputing Phylogenetic Trees with Missing Information Using Mathematical Programming.
    Yasui N; Vogiatzis C; Yoshida R; Fukumizu K
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2020; 17(4):1222-1230. PubMed ID: 30507538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimating species phylogeny from gene-tree probabilities despite incomplete lineage sorting: an example from Melanoplus grasshoppers.
    Carstens BC; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):400-11. PubMed ID: 17520504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On the unranked topology of maximally probable ranked gene tree topologies.
    Disanto F; Miglionico P; Narduzzi G
    J Math Biol; 2019 Sep; 79(4):1205-1225. PubMed ID: 31222377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A characterization of the set of species trees that produce anomalous ranked gene trees.
    Degnan JH; Rosenberg NA; Stadler T
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(6):1558-68. PubMed ID: 22868677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.