BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38943068)

  • 1. A bias-reduced generalized estimating equation approach for proportional odds models with small-sample longitudinal ordinal data.
    Tada Y; Sato T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):140. PubMed ID: 38943068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of bias-adjusted generalized estimating equations for sparse binary data in small-sample longitudinal studies.
    Gosho M; Ishii R; Noma H; Maruo K
    Stat Med; 2023 Jul; 42(15):2711-2727. PubMed ID: 37062288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Small sample GEE estimation of regression parameters for longitudinal data.
    Paul S; Zhang X
    Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(22):3869-81. PubMed ID: 24797886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bias-reduced and separation-proof GEE with small or sparse longitudinal binary data.
    Mondol MH; Rahman MS
    Stat Med; 2019 Jun; 38(14):2544-2560. PubMed ID: 30793784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An investigation of penalization and data augmentation to improve convergence of generalized estimating equations for clustered binary outcomes.
    Geroldinger A; Blagus R; Ogden H; Heinze G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):168. PubMed ID: 35681120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ORTH.Ord: An R package for analyzing correlated ordinal outcomes using alternating logistic regressions with orthogonalized residuals.
    Meng C; Ryan M; Rathouz PJ; Turner EL; Preisser JS; Li F
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Jul; 237():107567. PubMed ID: 37207384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Firth's logistic regression with rare events: accurate effect estimates and predictions?
    Puhr R; Heinze G; Nold M; Lusa L; Geroldinger A
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2302-2317. PubMed ID: 28295456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comment on 'Small sample GEE estimation of regression parameters for longitudinal data'.
    Lunardon N; Scharfstein D
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(22):3596-3600. PubMed ID: 28868672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of weighted estimating equations for longitudinal binary data with drop-outs missing at random.
    Preisser JS; Lohman KK; Rathouz PJ
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(20):3035-54. PubMed ID: 12369080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing Generalized Estimating Equation and Linear Mixed Effects Model for Estimating Marginal Association with Bivariate Continuous Outcomes.
    Li M; Kong X
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 30(3):307-316. PubMed ID: 35838059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An approximate marginal logistic distribution for the analysis of longitudinal ordinal data.
    Nooraee N; Abegaz F; Ormel J; Wit E; van den Heuvel ER
    Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):253-61. PubMed ID: 26458164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal analysis of ordinal clustered longitudinal data with informative cluster size.
    Mitani AA; Kaye EK; Nelson KP
    Biometrics; 2019 Sep; 75(3):938-949. PubMed ID: 30859544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On estimation for accelerated failure time models with small or rare event survival data.
    Alam TF; Rahman MS; Bari W
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):169. PubMed ID: 35689190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of multicenter clinical trials with very low event rates.
    Kim J; Troxel AB; Halpern SD; Volpp KG; Kahan BC; Morris TP; Harhay MO
    Trials; 2020 Nov; 21(1):917. PubMed ID: 33168073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of generalized estimating equations and quadratic inference functions using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth (NLSCY) database.
    Odueyungbo A; Browne D; Akhtar-Danesh N; Thabane L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 May; 8():28. PubMed ID: 18466627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the generalized estimating equation approach with the maximum likelihood approach for repeated measurements.
    Park T
    Stat Med; 1993 Sep; 12(18):1723-32. PubMed ID: 8248664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Model selection for generalized estimating equations accommodating dropout missingness.
    Shen CW; Chen YH
    Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1046-54. PubMed ID: 22463099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An appraisal of methods for the analysis of longitudinal categorical data with MAR drop-outs.
    O'Hara Hines RJ; Hines WG
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3549-63. PubMed ID: 16217856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of robust estimating equations to the analysis of quantitative longitudinal data.
    Hu M; Lachin JM
    Stat Med; 2001 Nov; 20(22):3411-28. PubMed ID: 11746326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.