These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38943303)

  • 21. Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using four rotary instrumentation systems: an in vitro study.
    Nagaveni SA; Balakoti KR; Smita K; Ratnakar P; Satish SV; Aravind T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1065-9. PubMed ID: 24858752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of apically extruded debris and irrigant using different file systems.
    Kütük B; Akpınar KE; Altunbaş D
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Dec; 20(12):1555-1560. PubMed ID: 29378986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Apical Extrusion of Intracanal Bacteria following use of Two Engine-driven Instrumentation Techniques: An in vitro Study.
    Mohammed N; Noushad MC; Balan B; Dhanesh N; Jayasheelan N; Revankar VD
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):939-942. PubMed ID: 27965505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficacy of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming on apically extruded debris with different preparation systems in curved canals.
    Arslan D; Kustarci A
    Int Endod J; 2018 Jan; 51 Suppl 1():e65-e72. PubMed ID: 28708251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of different kinematics on apical debris extrusion with a single-file system.
    Al Omari TMN; La Rosa GRM; Albanna RHI; Tabnjh A; Papale F; Pedullà E
    Odontology; 2023 Oct; 111(4):910-915. PubMed ID: 36917401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Apically extruded debris with three contemporary Ni-Ti instrumentation systems: an ex vivo comparative study.
    Logani A; Shah N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 18797091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of OneShape, 2Shape and One Curve endodontic instruments for debris and irrigant extrusion.
    Saricam E; Kayaoglu G
    Dent Med Probl; 2020; 57(3):255-259. PubMed ID: 33064376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and self-adjusting file systems.
    Ozsu D; Karatas E; Arslan H; Topcu MC
    Eur J Dent; 2014 Oct; 8(4):504-508. PubMed ID: 25512732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of ProTaper Next and HyFlex instruments on apical debris extrusion in curved canals.
    Koçak MM; Çiçek E; Koçak S; Sağlam BC; Furuncuoğlu F
    Int Endod J; 2016 Oct; 49(10):996-1000. PubMed ID: 26383696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the self-adjusting file system.
    De-Deus GA; Nogueira Leal Silva EJ; Moreira EJ; de Almeida Neves A; Belladonna FG; Tameirão M
    J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):526-9. PubMed ID: 24666904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Efficacy of two Ni-Ti systems and hand files for removing gutta-percha from root canals.
    Mollo A; Botti G; Prinicipi Goldoni N; Randellini E; Paragliola R; Chazine M; Ounsi HF; Grandini S
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jan; 45(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 21848894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Debris and irrigant extrusion potential of 2 rotary systems and irrigation needles.
    Altundasar E; Nagas E; Uyanik O; Serper A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):e31-5. PubMed ID: 21778084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex instruments.
    Capar ID; Arslan H; Akcay M; Ertas H
    J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1638-41. PubMed ID: 25260737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris Using Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, or Adaptive Motion.
    Sen OG; Bilgin B; Koçak S; Sağlam BC; Koçak MM
    Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(3):245-248. PubMed ID: 29972449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Instrumentation with Reciproc Blue, HyFlex EDM, and XP-endo Shaper Nickel-titanium Files.
    Uslu G; Özyürek T; Yılmaz K; Gündoğar M; Plotino G
    J Endod; 2018 May; 44(5):856-859. PubMed ID: 29550013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of Apical Extrusion of Debris during Root Canal Preparation with Different Ni-Ti File Systems: An
    Singh AK; Chavan SC; Shah A; Parida R; Kansar N; Poojary S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr; 22(4):349-352. PubMed ID: 34267001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Apical extrusion of debris in flat-oval root canals after using different instrumentation systems.
    Kirchhoff AL; Fariniuk LF; Mello I
    J Endod; 2015 Feb; 41(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 25447504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of apically extruded debris after root canal instrumentation using Reciproc(®) instruments with various kinematics.
    Arslan H; Doğanay E; Alsancak M; Çapar ID; Karataş E; Gündüz HA
    Int Endod J; 2016 Mar; 49(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 25809717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An
    Sowjanya T; Parvathaneni KP; Raju T; Varma NM; Dondapati GD; Podili S
    J Conserv Dent; 2022; 25(3):269-273. PubMed ID: 35836559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Apical extrusion of debris using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary systems.
    Koçak MM; Çiçek E; Koçak S; Sağlam BC; Yılmaz N
    Int Endod J; 2015 Mar; 48(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 24863544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.