These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38943405)

  • 1. Control strategies for trunk exoskeletons based on motion intent recognition: A review.
    Yuan R; Wang Q; Xu H; Yu H; Shi P
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2024; 54(4):575-597. PubMed ID: 38943405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flexible lower limb exoskeleton systems: A review.
    Meng Q; Zeng Q; Xie Q; Fei C; Kong B; Lu X; Wang H; Yu H
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2022; 50(4):367-390. PubMed ID: 35147568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perspectives of End Users on the Potential Use of Trunk Exoskeletons for People With Low-Back Pain: A Focus Group Study.
    Baltrusch SJ; Houdijk H; van Dieën JH; van Bennekom CAM; de Kruif AJTCM
    Hum Factors; 2020 May; 62(3):365-376. PubMed ID: 31914327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Artificial Intelligence-Based Wearable Robotic Exoskeletons for Upper Limb Rehabilitation: A Review.
    Vélez-Guerrero MA; Callejas-Cuervo M; Mazzoleni S
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Mar; 21(6):. PubMed ID: 33803911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Social Processes: What Determines Industrial Workers' Intention to Use Exoskeletons?
    Elprama SA; Vannieuwenhuyze JTA; De Bock S; Vanderborght B; De Pauw K; Meeusen R; Jacobs A
    Hum Factors; 2020 May; 62(3):337-350. PubMed ID: 31971838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Myoelectric Control Systems for Upper Limb Wearable Robotic Exoskeletons and Exosuits-A Systematic Review.
    Fu J; Choudhury R; Hosseini SM; Simpson R; Park JH
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(21):. PubMed ID: 36365832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of Wearable Sensors in Actuation and Control of Powered Ankle Exoskeletons: A Comprehensive Review.
    Kian A; Widanapathirana G; Joseph AM; Lai DTH; Begg R
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 35336413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Review on Locomotion Mode Recognition and Prediction When Using Active Orthoses and Exoskeletons.
    Moreira L; Figueiredo J; Cerqueira J; Santos CP
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An industrial exoskeleton user acceptance framework based on a literature review of empirical studies.
    Elprama SA; Vanderborght B; Jacobs A
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Apr; 100():103615. PubMed ID: 34847372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Industrial exoskeletons: Need for intervention effectiveness research.
    Howard J; Murashov VV; Lowe BD; Lu ML
    Am J Ind Med; 2020 Mar; 63(3):201-208. PubMed ID: 31828844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research of intent recognition in rehabilitation robots: a systematic review.
    Luo S; Meng Q; Li S; Yu H
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 May; 19(4):1307-1318. PubMed ID: 36695473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Opportunities and challenges in the development of exoskeletons for locomotor assistance.
    Siviy C; Baker LM; Quinlivan BT; Porciuncula F; Swaminathan K; Awad LN; Walsh CJ
    Nat Biomed Eng; 2023 Apr; 7(4):456-472. PubMed ID: 36550303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of robotic exoskeletons for improving gait in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review.
    Hunt M; Everaert L; Brown M; Muraru L; Hatzidimitriadou E; Desloovere K
    Gait Posture; 2022 Oct; 98():343-354. PubMed ID: 36306544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Pilot Study of Varying Thoracic and Abdominal Compression in a Reconfigurable Trunk Exoskeleton During Different Activities.
    Gorsic M; Regmi Y; Johnson AP; Dai B; Novak D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2020 Jun; 67(6):1585-1594. PubMed ID: 31502962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load.
    de Looze MP; Bosch T; Krause F; Stadler KS; O'Sullivan LW
    Ergonomics; 2016 May; 59(5):671-81. PubMed ID: 26444053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Manufacturing Industry Stakeholder Perspectives on Occupational Exoskeletons: Changes after a Brief Exposure to Exoskeletons.
    Raghuraman RN; Upasani S; Gonzales A; Aviles J; Cha J; Srinivasan D
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2023; 11(3-4):71-80. PubMed ID: 37747446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wearable rehabilitation exoskeletons of the lower limb: analysis of versatility and adaptability.
    Plaza A; Hernandez M; Puyuelo G; Garces E; Garcia E
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 May; 18(4):392-406. PubMed ID: 33332159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical Evaluation of Passive Back-Support Exoskeletons in a Precision Manual Assembly Task: "Expected" Effects on Trunk Muscle Activity, Perceived Exertion, and Task Performance.
    Madinei S; Alemi MM; Kim S; Srinivasan D; Nussbaum MA
    Hum Factors; 2020 May; 62(3):441-457. PubMed ID: 31934773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of Lower Limb Exoskeletons as an Assessment Tool for Human Motor Performance: A Systematic Review.
    Moeller T; Moehler F; Krell-Roesch J; Dežman M; Marquardt C; Asfour T; Stein T; Woll A
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36991743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Upper limb soft robotic wearable devices: a systematic review.
    Bardi E; Gandolla M; Braghin F; Resta F; Pedrocchi ALG; Ambrosini E
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Aug; 19(1):87. PubMed ID: 35948915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.