These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38943842)

  • 1. Relationships between European carcass evaluation and Meat Standards Australia grading scheme applied to young beef cattle.
    Santinello M; Penasa M; Goi A; Rampado N; Hocquette JF; De Marchi M
    Meat Sci; 2024 Oct; 216():109575. PubMed ID: 38943842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Meat Standards Australia carcass grading site affects assessment of marbling and prediction of meat-eating quality in growing European beef cattle.
    Santinello M; Rampado N; Penasa M; Hocquette JF; Pethick D; De Marchi M
    Meat Sci; 2024 Jul; 213():109501. PubMed ID: 38574653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The variation in the eating quality of beef from different sexes and breed classes cannot be completely explained by carcass measurements.
    Bonny SP; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Farmer LJ; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):987-95. PubMed ID: 26750424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. European conformation and fat scores of bovine carcasses are not good indicators of marbling.
    Liu J; Chriki S; Ellies-Oury MP; Legrand I; Pogorzelski G; Wierzbicki J; Farmer L; Troy D; Polkinghorne R; Hocquette JF
    Meat Sci; 2020 Dec; 170():108233. PubMed ID: 32688221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are Marbling and the Prediction of Beef Eating Quality Affected by Different Grading Sites?
    Liu J; Pogorzelski G; Neveu A; Legrand I; Pethick D; Ellies-Oury MP; Hocquette JF
    Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():611153. PubMed ID: 33855054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Meat Standards Australia Index indicates beef carcass quality.
    McGilchrist P; Polkinghorne RJ; Ball AJ; Thompson JM
    Animal; 2019 Aug; 13(8):1750-1757. PubMed ID: 30724139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of ossification from live and carcass traits in young beef cattle: model development and evaluation.
    Gudex BW; McPhee MJ; Oddy VH; Walmsley BJ
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Jan; 97(1):144-155. PubMed ID: 30388230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Review: The variability of the eating quality of beef can be reduced by predicting consumer satisfaction.
    Bonny SPF; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
    Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2434-2442. PubMed ID: 29606159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modelling of beef sensory quality for a better prediction of palatability.
    Hocquette JF; Van Wezemael L; Chriki S; Legrand I; Verbeke W; Farmer L; Scollan ND; Polkinghorne R; Rødbotten R; Allen P; Pethick DW
    Meat Sci; 2014 Jul; 97(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 24035246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association between visual marbling score and chemical intramuscular fat with camera marbling percentage in Australian beef carcasses.
    Stewart SM; Gardner GE; Williams A; Pethick DW; McGilchrist P; Kuchida K
    Meat Sci; 2021 Nov; 181():108369. PubMed ID: 33261986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of consumer palatability in beef using visual marbling scores and chemical intramuscular fat percentage.
    Stewart SM; Gardner GE; McGilchrist P; Pethick DW; Polkinghorne R; Thompson JM; Tarr G
    Meat Sci; 2021 Nov; 181():108322. PubMed ID: 33067083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic parameters for carcass traits of progeny of beef bulls mated to dairy cows.
    Keele JW; Foraker BA; Boldt R; Kemp C; Kuehn LA; Woerner DR
    J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 38489760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does a single adjustment in the meat standards Australia beef grading model cater for different hormonal growth promotant formulations?
    Packer DT; McGilchrist P; Polkinghorne RJ; Ball AJ; Thompson JM
    Animal; 2021 May; 15(5):100196. PubMed ID: 34029795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic parameters of Visual Image Analysis primal cut carcass traits of commercial prime beef slaughter animals.
    Moore KL; Mrode R; Coffey MP
    Animal; 2017 Oct; 11(10):1653-1659. PubMed ID: 28294092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of beef carcass and meat traits from rearing factors in young bulls and cull cows.
    Soulat J; Picard B; Léger S; Monteils V
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Apr; 94(4):1712-26. PubMed ID: 27136029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of beef carcass and meat quality traits from factors characterising the rearing management system applied during the whole life of heifers.
    Soulat J; Picard B; Léger S; Monteils V
    Meat Sci; 2018 Jun; 140():88-100. PubMed ID: 29549845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective grading of eye muscle area, intramuscular fat and marbling in Australian beef and lamb.
    Stewart SM; Lauridsen T; Toft H; Pethick DW; Gardner GE; McGilchrist P; Christensen M
    Meat Sci; 2021 Nov; 181():108358. PubMed ID: 33160745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of beef: 1. A single composite score can predict beef quality grades.
    Bonny SPF; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
    Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1389-1398. PubMed ID: 27829474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review: Beef-eating quality: a European journey.
    Farmer LJ; Farrell DT
    Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2424-2433. PubMed ID: 30004320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategies to predict and improve eating quality of cooked beef using carcass and meat composition traits in Angus cattle.
    Mateescu RG; Oltenacu PA; Garmyn AJ; Mafi GG; VanOverbeke DL
    J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):2160-71. PubMed ID: 27285712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.