These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38943983)

  • 1. Enhancing safety in conditionally automated driving: Can more takeover request visual information make a difference in hazard scenarios with varied hazard visibility?
    Huang WC; Fan LH; Han ZJ; Niu YF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Sep; 205():107687. PubMed ID: 38943983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of takeover request lead time on drivers' situation awareness for manually exiting from freeways: A web-based study on level 3 automated vehicles.
    Tan X; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Apr; 168():106593. PubMed ID: 35180465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of duration of monitoring before takeover request on takeover time with insights into eye tracking data.
    Huang C; Yang B; Nakano K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 185():107018. PubMed ID: 36924623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Behavioral Changes to Repeated Takeovers in Highly Automated Driving: Effects of the Takeover-Request Design and the Nondriving-Related Task Modality.
    Roche F; Somieski A; Brandenburg S
    Hum Factors; 2019 Aug; 61(5):839-849. PubMed ID: 30517032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting driver takeover performance in conditionally automated driving.
    Du N; Zhou F; Pulver EM; Tilbury DM; Robert LP; Pradhan AK; Yang XJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105748. PubMed ID: 33099127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using eye-tracking to investigate the effects of pre-takeover visual engagement on situation awareness during automated driving.
    Liang N; Yang J; Yu D; Prakah-Asante KO; Curry R; Blommer M; Swaminathan R; Pitts BJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106143. PubMed ID: 34010743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of driving style on takeover performance during automated driving: Under the influence of warning system factors.
    Zhang Y; Ma Q; Qu J; Zhou R
    Appl Ergon; 2024 May; 117():104229. PubMed ID: 38232632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychophysiological responses to takeover requests in conditionally automated driving.
    Du N; Yang XJ; Zhou F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105804. PubMed ID: 33128991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does a faster takeover necessarily mean it is better? A study on the influence of urgency and takeover-request lead time on takeover performance and safety.
    Wu H; Wu C; Lyu N; Li J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jun; 171():106647. PubMed ID: 35427908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of unreliable automation, non-driving related task, and takeover time budget on drivers' takeover performance and workload.
    Shahini F; Park J; Welch K; Zahabi M
    Ergonomics; 2023 Feb; 66(2):182-197. PubMed ID: 35451915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of different takeover request interfaces on takeover behavior and performance during conditionally automated driving.
    Ou YK; Huang WX; Fang CW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Nov; 162():106425. PubMed ID: 34601181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Where drivers are looking at during takeover: Implications for safe takeovers during conditionally automated driving.
    Huang C; Yang B; Nakano K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(7):599-608. PubMed ID: 37347169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An analysis of physiological responses as indicators of driver takeover readiness in conditionally automated driving.
    Deng M; Gluck A; Zhao Y; Li D; Menassa CC; Kamat VR; Brinkley J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Feb; 195():107372. PubMed ID: 37979464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring driving anger-caused impairment of takeover performance among professional taxi drivers during partially automated driving.
    Pan H; Payre W; Gao Z; Wang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Sep; 205():107686. PubMed ID: 38909484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Takeover Request Time and Warning Modality on Trust in L3 Automated Driving.
    Wu Y; Yao X; Deng F; Yuan X
    Hum Factors; 2024 Aug; ():187208241278433. PubMed ID: 39212190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How Can the Trust-Change Direction be Measured and Identified During Takeover Transitions in Conditionally Automated Driving? Using Physiological Responses and Takeover-Related Factors.
    Yi B; Cao H; Song X; Wang J; Zhao S; Guo W; Cao D
    Hum Factors; 2024 Apr; 66(4):1276-1301. PubMed ID: 36625335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling takeover behavior in level 3 automated driving via a structural equation model: Considering the mediating role of trust.
    Jin M; Lu G; Chen F; Shi X; Tan H; Zhai J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106156. PubMed ID: 33957474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining the Effects of Visibility and Time Headway on the Takeover Risk during Conditionally Automated Driving.
    Peng H; Chen F; Chen P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(21):. PubMed ID: 36360784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Computational Cognitive Model of Driver Response Time for Scheduled Freeway Exiting Takeovers in Conditionally Automated Vehicles.
    Tan X; Zhang Y
    Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1583-1599. PubMed ID: 36473708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is driving experience all that matters? Drivers' takeover performance in conditionally automated driving.
    Zhang N; Fard M; Davy JL; Parida S; Robinson SR
    J Safety Res; 2023 Dec; 87():323-331. PubMed ID: 38081705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.