104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38944097)
21. Selecting Sample Preparation Workflows for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Analysis of Patient Samples with Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Hernandez-Valladares M; Aasebø E; Selheim F; Berven FS; Bruserud Ø
Proteomes; 2016 Aug; 4(3):. PubMed ID: 28248234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of detergent-based sample preparation workflows for LTQ-Orbitrap analysis of the Escherichia coli proteome.
Tanca A; Biosa G; Pagnozzi D; Addis MF; Uzzau S
Proteomics; 2013 Sep; 13(17):2597-607. PubMed ID: 23784971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative Evaluation of Filter Aided Sample Preparation (FASP) and Multienzyme Digestion FASP Protocols.
Wiśniewski JR
Anal Chem; 2016 May; 88(10):5438-43. PubMed ID: 27119963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Coupling suspension trapping-based sample preparation and data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry for sensitive exosomal proteomic analysis.
Wu C; Zhou S; Mitchell MI; Hou C; Byers S; Loudig O; Ma J
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2022 Mar; 414(8):2585-2595. PubMed ID: 35181835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics; from Proteomes to Peptides.
Rogers JC; Bomgarden RD
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 919():43-62. PubMed ID: 27975212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Filter-Aided Sample Preparation: The Versatile and Efficient Method for Proteomic Analysis.
Wiśniewski JR
Methods Enzymol; 2017; 585():15-27. PubMed ID: 28109427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A Comparison of Bottom-Up Proteomic Sample Preparation Methods for the Human Parasite
Mayr AL; Hummel K; Leitsch D; Razzazi-Fazeli E
ACS Omega; 2024 Feb; 9(8):9782-9791. PubMed ID: 38434803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Proteomics of hydrophobic samples: Fast, robust and low-cost workflows for clinical approaches.
Pasing Y; Colnoe S; Hansen T
Proteomics; 2017 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 27412720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Surfactant Cocktail-Aided Extraction/Precipitation/On-Pellet Digestion Strategy Enables Efficient and Reproducible Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Quantitative Proteomics.
Shen S; An B; Wang X; Hilchey SP; Li J; Cao J; Tian Y; Hu C; Jin L; Ng A; Tu C; Qu M; Zand MS; Qu J
Anal Chem; 2018 Sep; 90(17):10350-10359. PubMed ID: 30078316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Adding polyvinylpyrrolidone to low level protein samples significantly improves peptide recovery in FASP digests: An inexpensive and simple modification to the FASP protocol.
Tremblay TL; Hill JJ
J Proteomics; 2021 Jan; 230():104000. PubMed ID: 33011348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Proteomic Profile of EPS-Urine through FASP Digestion and Data-Independent Analysis.
Prestagiacomo LE; Gabriele C; Morelli P; Rota MA; Alba S; Cuda G; Damiano R; Gaspari M
J Vis Exp; 2021 May; (171):. PubMed ID: 34028441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Improving Proteome Coverage and Sample Recovery with Enhanced FASP (eFASP) for Quantitative Proteomic Experiments.
Erde J; Loo RR; Loo JA
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1550():11-18. PubMed ID: 28188519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Benchmarking low- and high-throughput protein cleanup and digestion methods for human fecal metaproteomics.
Tanca A; Deledda MA; De Diego L; Abbondio M; Uzzau S
mSystems; 2024 Jun; ():e0066124. PubMed ID: 38934547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Freezing effects on the acute myeloid leukemia cell proteome and phosphoproteome revealed using optimal quantitative workflows.
Aasebø E; Mjaavatten O; Vaudel M; Farag Y; Selheim F; Berven F; Bruserud Ø; Hernandez-Valladares M
J Proteomics; 2016 Aug; 145():214-225. PubMed ID: 27107777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative assessment of in-solution digestion efficiency identifies optimal protocols for unbiased protein analysis.
León IR; Schwämmle V; Jensen ON; Sprenger RR
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2013 Oct; 12(10):2992-3005. PubMed ID: 23792921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Enhanced SDC-assisted digestion coupled with lipid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for shotgun analysis of membrane proteome.
Lin Y; Wang K; Liu Z; Lin H; Yu L
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2015 Oct; 1002():144-51. PubMed ID: 26319803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics.
Milkovska-Stamenova S; Wölk M; Hoffmann R
Molecules; 2021 Nov; 26(22):. PubMed ID: 34833908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bottom-Up Proteomics: Advancements in Sample Preparation.
Duong VA; Lee H
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Mar; 24(6):. PubMed ID: 36982423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improvement of a sample preparation method assisted by sodium deoxycholate for mass-spectrometry-based shotgun membrane proteomics.
Lin Y; Lin H; Liu Z; Wang K; Yan Y
J Sep Sci; 2014 Nov; 37(22):3321-9. PubMed ID: 25196059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of SPEED, S-Trap, and In-Solution-Based Sample Preparation Methods for Mass Spectrometry in Kidney Tissue and Plasma.
Templeton EM; Pilbrow AP; Kleffmann T; Pickering JW; Rademaker MT; Scott NJA; Ellmers LJ; Charles CJ; Endre ZH; Richards AM; Cameron VA; Lassé M
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Mar; 24(7):. PubMed ID: 37047281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
