These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3894412)

  • 1. Comparison of the PRAS II, AN-Ident, and RapID-ANA systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Burlage RS; Ellner PD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jul; 22(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 3894412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of three identification systems for anaerobes.
    Murray PR; Weber CJ; Niles AC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jul; 22(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 2862161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of PRAS II, RapID ANA, and API 20A systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Karachewski NO; Busch EL; Wells CL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jan; 21(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 3881468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and reproducibility of the 4-hour ATB 32A method for anaerobe identification.
    Kitch TT; Appelbaum PC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Nov; 27(11):2509-13. PubMed ID: 2681252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the RapID ANA system as a four-hour method for anaerobe identification.
    Downes J; Andrew JH
    Pathology; 1988 Jul; 20(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 3060822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Specimen collection and transport, anaerobic culture techniques, and identification of anaerobes.
    Citron DM
    Rev Infect Dis; 1984; 6 Suppl 1():S51-8. PubMed ID: 6372037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of the RapID-ANA II panel for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Celig DM; Schreckenberger PC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Mar; 29(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 2037661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of RapID-ANA and Minitek with a conventional method for biochemical identification of anaerobes.
    Hussain Z; Lannigan R; Schieven BC; Stoakes L; Kelly T; Groves D
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1987 May; 7(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 3319374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the RapID-ANA system for identification of anaerobic bacteria of veterinary origin.
    Adney WS; Jones RL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Dec; 22(6):980-3. PubMed ID: 3905854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Gulletta E; Amato G; Nani E; Covelli I
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jun; 4(3):282-5. PubMed ID: 4018067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the AnIdent system for the identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Stenson MJ; Lee DT; Rosenblatt JE; Contezac JM
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1986 May; 5(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 3709098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of RapID ANA and API 20 A for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Summanen P; Jousimies-Somer H
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Dec; 7(6):771-5. PubMed ID: 3145860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the new RapID-ANA II system for the identification of clinical anaerobic isolates.
    Marler LM; Siders JA; Wolters LC; Pettigrew Y; Skitt BL; Allen SD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 May; 29(5):874-8. PubMed ID: 2056052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the BBL Crystal Anaerobe identification system.
    Cavallaro JJ; Wiggs LS; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3186-91. PubMed ID: 9399517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preformed enzyme profiles of reference strains of gram-positive anaerobic cocci.
    Murdoch DA; Mitchelmore IJ; Nash RA; Hardie JM; Tabaqchali S
    J Med Microbiol; 1988 Sep; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 3172172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Problems encountered in clinical anaerobic bacteriology.
    Jousimies-Somer HR; Finegold SM
    Rev Infect Dis; 1984; 6 Suppl 1():S45-50. PubMed ID: 6201991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of API ZYM system with API AN-Ident, API 20A, Minitek Anaerobe II, and RapID-ANA systems for identification of Clostridium difficile.
    Head CB; Ratnam S
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Jan; 26(1):144-6. PubMed ID: 3277989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Minitek Anaerobe II, API An-Ident, and RapID ANA systems for identification of Clostridium difficile.
    Bate G
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1986 Jun; 85(6):716-8. PubMed ID: 3518405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of BBL Crystal ANR ID Kit and API rapid ID 32 A for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Moll WM; Ungerechts J; Marklein G; Schaal KP
    Zentralbl Bakteriol; 1996 Jul; 284(2-3):329-47. PubMed ID: 8837394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the ATB 32 A system for identification of anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens.
    Looney WJ; Gallusser AJ; Modde HK
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Jul; 28(7):1519-24. PubMed ID: 2199516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.