These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38945998)
1. Improving the accuracy of genomic prediction in dairy cattle using the biologically annotated neural networks framework. Wang X; Shi S; Ali Khan MY; Zhang Z; Zhang Y J Anim Sci Biotechnol; 2024 Jul; 15(1):87. PubMed ID: 38945998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Random forest estimation of genomic breeding values for disease susceptibility over different disease incidences and genomic architectures in simulated cow calibration groups. Naderi S; Yin T; König S J Dairy Sci; 2016 Sep; 99(9):7261-7273. PubMed ID: 27344385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving accuracy of genomic prediction by genetic architecture based priors in a Bayesian model. Gao N; Li J; He J; Xiao G; Luo Y; Zhang H; Chen Z; Zhang Z BMC Genet; 2015 Oct; 16():120. PubMed ID: 26466667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracies of genomic prediction for twenty economically important traits in Chinese Simmental beef cattle. Zhu B; Guo P; Wang Z; Zhang W; Chen Y; Zhang L; Gao H; Wang Z; Gao X; Xu L; Li J Anim Genet; 2019 Dec; 50(6):634-643. PubMed ID: 31502261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genomic predictions combining SNP markers and copy number variations in Nellore cattle. Hay EHA; Utsunomiya YT; Xu L; Zhou Y; Neves HHR; Carvalheiro R; Bickhart DM; Ma L; Garcia JF; Liu GE BMC Genomics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):441. PubMed ID: 29871610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genomic prediction of blood biomarkers of metabolic disorders in Holstein cattle using parametric and nonparametric models. Mota LFM; Giannuzzi D; Pegolo S; Sturaro E; Gianola D; Negrini R; Trevisi E; Ajmone Marsan P; Cecchinato A Genet Sel Evol; 2024 Apr; 56(1):31. PubMed ID: 38684971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using machine learning to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction of reproduction traits in pigs. Wang X; Shi S; Wang G; Luo W; Wei X; Qiu A; Luo F; Ding X J Anim Sci Biotechnol; 2022 May; 13(1):60. PubMed ID: 35578371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic prediction with parallel computing for slaughter traits in Chinese Simmental beef cattle using high-density genotypes. Guo P; Zhu B; Xu L; Niu H; Wang Z; Guan L; Liang Y; Ni H; Guo Y; Chen Y; Zhang L; Gao X; Gao H; Li J PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179885. PubMed ID: 28723906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic Predictions in Korean Hanwoo Cows: A Comparative Analysis of Genomic BLUP and Bayesian Methods for Reproductive Traits. Haque MA; Lee YM; Ha JJ; Jin S; Park B; Kim NY; Won JI; Kim JJ Animals (Basel); 2023 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38200758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploring the genetic architecture and improving genomic prediction accuracy for mastitis and milk production traits in dairy cattle by mapping variants to hepatic transcriptomic regions responsive to intra-mammary infection. Fang L; Sahana G; Ma P; Su G; Yu Y; Zhang S; Lund MS; Sørensen P Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):44. PubMed ID: 28499345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomic breeding value prediction and QTL mapping of QTLMAS2011 data using Bayesian and GBLUP methods. Zeng J; Pszczola M; Wolc A; Strabel T; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC BMC Proc; 2012 May; 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7. PubMed ID: 22640755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances. Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Expanding the application of haplotype-based genomic predictions to the wild: A case of antibody response against Teladorsagia circumcincta in Soay sheep. Vahedi SM; Salek Ardetani S; Brito LF; Karimi K; Pahlavan Afshari K; Banabazi MH BMC Genomics; 2023 Jun; 24(1):335. PubMed ID: 37330501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mixture models detect large effect QTL better than GBLUP and result in more accurate and persistent predictions. Wolc A; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Dekkers JC; Fernando R; Garrick DJ J Anim Sci Biotechnol; 2016; 7():7. PubMed ID: 26870325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving Genomic Predictions in Multi-Breed Cattle Populations: A Comparative Analysis of BayesR and GBLUP Models. Ma H; Li H; Ge F; Zhao H; Zhu B; Zhang L; Gao H; Xu L; Li J; Wang Z Genes (Basel); 2024 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 38397242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of GBLUP, BayesB and elastic net for genomic prediction in Chinese Simmental beef cattle. Wang X; Miao J; Chang T; Xia J; An B; Li Y; Xu L; Zhang L; Gao X; Li J; Gao H PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0210442. PubMed ID: 30817758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds. Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genome-enabled prediction of reproductive traits in Nellore cattle using parametric models and machine learning methods. Alves AAC; Espigolan R; Bresolin T; Costa RM; Fernandes Júnior GA; Ventura RV; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG Anim Genet; 2021 Feb; 52(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 33191532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]