These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38952614)

  • 1. The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future.
    Drozdz JA; Ladomery MR
    Br J Biomed Sci; 2024; 81():12054. PubMed ID: 38952614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Data publishing and scientific journals: the future of the scientific paper in a world of shared data.
    De Schutter E
    Neuroinformatics; 2010 Oct; 8(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 20835853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The examination of peer review and publication in neurology.
    Wong VS
    J Child Neurol; 2010 Oct; 25(10):1298-301. PubMed ID: 20606060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system.
    Stahel PF; Moore EE
    BMC Med; 2014 Sep; 12():179. PubMed ID: 25270270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The different models of scientific journals].
    Chippaux JP
    Med Trop Sante Int; 2023 Dec; 3(4):. PubMed ID: 38390021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distinguishing Predatory from Reputable Publishing Practices.
    Happe LE
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2020 Aug; 26(8):956-960. PubMed ID: 32715959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.
    Galipeau J; Barbour V; Baskin P; Bell-Syer S; Cobey K; Cumpston M; Deeks J; Garner P; MacLehose H; Shamseer L; Straus S; Tugwell P; Wager E; Winker M; Moher D
    BMC Med; 2016 Feb; 14():16. PubMed ID: 26837937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Life begins again at age 126!
    Pietrini P; Ghelarducci B
    Arch Ital Biol; 2008 Mar; 146(1):2p preceding 1. PubMed ID: 18666443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review.
    Haffar S; Bazerbachi F; Murad MH
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2019 Apr; 94(4):670-676. PubMed ID: 30797567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predatory journals: The rise of worthless biomedical science.
    Sharma H; Verma S
    J Postgrad Med; 2018; 64(4):226-231. PubMed ID: 30306968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expanding access to published research: open access and self-archiving.
    Mower A; Youngkin ME
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18347463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Truth in Science Publishing: A Personal Perspective.
    Südhof TC
    PLoS Biol; 2016 Aug; 14(8):e1002547. PubMed ID: 27564858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Submission of scientifically sound and ethical manuscripts to peer-reviewed journals - a reviewer's personal perspective on bioanalytical publications.
    Weng N
    Biomed Chromatogr; 2012 Nov; 26(11):1457-60. PubMed ID: 22987619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
    Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e033421. PubMed ID: 31767597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An overview of the peer review process in biomedical sciences.
    Miller E; James Weightman M; Basu A; Amos A; Brakoulias V
    Australas Psychiatry; 2024 Jun; 32(3):247-251. PubMed ID: 38327220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study.
    Glonti K; Hren D
    BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e020568. PubMed ID: 30341111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. It Is Time to Re-Evaluate the Peer Review Process for Preclinical Research.
    Bhattacharya R; Ellis LM
    Bioessays; 2018 Jan; 40(1):. PubMed ID: 29226979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New happenings at the NIH.
    Kennedy DN
    Neuroinformatics; 2008; 6(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 18604608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Challenges for publishing Brazilian scientific health journals.
    Barata RB
    Cien Saude Colet; 2019 Mar; 24(3):929-939. PubMed ID: 30892514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coached Peer Review: Developing the Next Generation of Authors.
    Sidalak D; Purdy E; Luckett-Gatopoulos S; Murray H; Thoma B; Chan TM
    Acad Med; 2017 Feb; 92(2):201-204. PubMed ID: 27191842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.