These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38953391)

  • 1. The modulation of task relevance on emotion-induced blindness depends on whether targets and distractors belong to the same category.
    Xu J; Pei Y; Yu Q; Zhang K; Ren Y
    Cogn Emot; 2024 Jul; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 38953391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Searching for emotional salience.
    Baker AL; Kim M; Hoffman JE
    Cognition; 2021 Sep; 214():104730. PubMed ID: 33975124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Habituation to emotional distractors attenuates emotion-induced blindness.
    Jia L; Wang L; Sung B; Wang C; Chen D; Wang J
    Emotion; 2022 Sep; 22(6):1359-1367. PubMed ID: 36006702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emotional capture during emotion-induced blindness is not automatic.
    Hoffman JE; Kim M; Taylor M; Holiday K
    Cortex; 2020 Jan; 122():140-158. PubMed ID: 31003713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial distribution of emotional attentional blink under top-down attentional control.
    Singh D; Sunny MM
    Cogn Process; 2023 Feb; 24(1):153-159. PubMed ID: 36156164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Event-related potentials of food-induced blindness in the rapid serial visual presentation paradigm.
    Kirsten H; Seib-Pfeifer LE; Schmuck J; Gibbons H
    Appetite; 2023 Jan; 180():106344. PubMed ID: 36240947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prior memory encoding of negative distractors biases emotion-induced blindness.
    Jia L; Zhao Y; Sung B; Cheng M; Wang X; Wang J
    Cogn Emot; 2023; 37(6):1116-1122. PubMed ID: 37287280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in emotion-induced blindness: Are they reliable and what do they measure?
    Edwards M; Denniston D; Bariesheff C; Wyche NJ; Goodhew SC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38760639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. More than a feeling: The emotional attentional blink relies on non-emotional "pop out," but is weak compared to the attentional blink.
    Santacroce LA; Swami AL; Tamber-Rosenau BJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 May; 85(4):1034-1053. PubMed ID: 36918514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A vigilance avoidance account of spatial selectivity in dual-stream emotion induced blindness.
    Proud M; Goodhew SC; Edwards M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Apr; 27(2):322-329. PubMed ID: 31898265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Manipulations of distractor frequency do not mitigate emotion-induced blindness.
    Zhao JL; Most SB
    Cogn Emot; 2019 May; 33(3):442-451. PubMed ID: 29644917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do emotion-induced blindness and the attentional blink share underlying mechanisms? An event-related potential study of emotionally-arousing words.
    MacLeod J; Stewart BM; Newman AJ; Arnell KM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 17(3):592-611. PubMed ID: 28265963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Threat captures attention, but not automatically: Top-down goals modulate attentional orienting to threat distractors.
    Vromen JM; Lipp OV; Remington RW; Becker SI
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2266-79. PubMed ID: 27234013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of Attention Control on Implicit and Explicit Emotion Processing of Face and Body: Evidence From Flanker and Same-or-Different Paradigms.
    Oldrati V; Bardoni A; Poggi G; Urgesi C
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2971. PubMed ID: 32038372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contextual Modulation of Emotional Distraction: Attentional Capture and Motivational Significance.
    Micucci A; Ferrari V; De Cesarei A; Codispoti M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 32(4):621-633. PubMed ID: 31765599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential impact of emotional task relevance on three indices of prioritised processing for fearful and angry facial expressions.
    Engen HG; Smallwood J; Singer T
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Jan; 31(1):175-184. PubMed ID: 26371881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proactive deprioritization of emotional distractors enhances target perception.
    Kennedy BL; Newman VE; Most SB
    Emotion; 2018 Oct; 18(7):1052-1061. PubMed ID: 28872342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nx4 Reduced Susceptibility to Distraction in an Attention Modulation Task.
    Mayer K; Krylova M; Alizadeh S; Jamalabadi H; van der Meer J; Vester JC; Naschold B; Schultz M; Walter M
    Front Psychiatry; 2021; 12():746215. PubMed ID: 34912250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gone for good: Lack of priming suggests early perceptual interference in emotion-induced blindness with negative stimuli.
    Onie S; MacLeod C; Most SB
    Emotion; 2023 Oct; 23(7):1869-1875. PubMed ID: 36521160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective visual attention to emotional pictures: Interactions of task-relevance and emotion are restricted to the late positive potential.
    Schindler S; Straube T
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Sep; 57(9):e13585. PubMed ID: 32306463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.