These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38955260)
21. Comparison of the positional accuracy of robotic guided dental implant placement with static guided and dynamic navigation systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Khan M; Javed F; Haji Z; Ghafoor R J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Oct; 132(4):746.e1-746.e8. PubMed ID: 38490935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the accuracy of implant position for two-implants supported fixed dental prosthesis using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Yimarj P; Subbalekha K; Dhanesuan K; Siriwatana K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Dec; 22(6):672-678. PubMed ID: 32939934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: An in vitro study. Ruiz-Romero V; Jorba-Garcia A; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E J Dent; 2024 Oct; 149():105290. PubMed ID: 39106900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Placement accuracy and primary stability of implants in the esthetic zone using dynamic and static computer-assisted navigation: A retrospective case-control study. Liu Q; Liu Y; Chen D; Wu X; Huang R; Liu R; Chen Z; Chen Z J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; 131(3):427-435. PubMed ID: 36473750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Exploring training dental implant placement using static or dynamic devices among dental students. Wang W; Zhuang M; Li S; Shen Y; Lan R; Wu Y; Wang F Eur J Dent Educ; 2023 Aug; 27(3):438-448. PubMed ID: 35579548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Marchetti M; Scarfò B; Esposito M Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 25237668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The accuracy of static vs. dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial. Kaewsiri D; Panmekiate S; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jun; 30(6):505-514. PubMed ID: 31060099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of freehand versus guided immediate implant placement: A randomized controlled trial. Chandran K R S; Goyal M; Mittal N; George JS J Dent; 2023 Sep; 136():104620. PubMed ID: 37454788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy and Precision of Haptic Robotic-Guided Implant Surgery in a Large Consecutive Series. Neugarten JM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Feb; 39(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 37939239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vitro and in vivo accuracy of autonomous robotic vs. fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery. He J; Zhang Q; Wang X; Fu M; Zhang H; Song L; Pu R; Jiang Z; Yang G Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 26(2):385-401. PubMed ID: 38214435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of implant placement with a combined use of static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial. Yotpibulwong T; Arunjaroensuk S; Kaboosaya B; Sinpitaksakul P; Arksornnukit M; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Apr; 34(4):330-341. PubMed ID: 36756684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery With Different Fields of View of Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography. Lee HC; Chiou LL; Yang CC; Lin WS; Dutra V; Hamada Y J Oral Implantol; 2024 Apr; 50(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 38400736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy in static guided implant surgery: Results from a multicenter retrospective clinical study on 21 patients treated in three private practices. Luongo F; Lerner H; Gesso C; Sormani A; Kalemaj Z; Luongo G J Dent; 2024 Jan; 140():104795. PubMed ID: 38016619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of digital technologies on implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: A scoping review. Lanis A; Peña-Cardelles JF; Negreiros WM; Hamilton A; Gallucci GO Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Aug; 35(8):1000-1010. PubMed ID: 38613432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy assessment of implant placement with versus without a CAD/CAM surgical guide by novices versus specialists via the digital registration method: an in vitro randomized crossover study. Li S; Yi C; Yu Z; Wu A; Zhang Y; Lin Y BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):426. PubMed ID: 37370027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of implant shape and length on the accuracy of robot-assisted immediate implant surgery: An in vitro study. Wang Y; Yu S; Wang Y; Feng Y; Yan Q; Zhang Y Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Mar; 35(3):350-357. PubMed ID: 38174662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Robot-assisted surgery for dental implant placement: A narrative review. Wang M; Liu F; Zhao X; Wu Y J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105034. PubMed ID: 38729287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]