These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38956847)

  • 1. Assessment of Smear Layer Removal and Penetration Depth of Root Canal Irrigant Using Different Irrigation Activation Systems: A Comparative Study.
    Pujari MD; Das M; Das A; Kamath DG; Henry J; Shyam A; Alhaleis DM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Apr; 25(4):331-334. PubMed ID: 38956847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study.
    Mancini M; Cerroni L; Iorio L; Armellin E; Conte G; Cianconi L
    J Endod; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1456-60. PubMed ID: 24139274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SEM Evaluation of Various Intracanal Irrigation Devices on Smear Layer Removal: A Comparative Study.
    Singh AK; Khateeb SU; Pathrose SP; Kumar AS; Haribaskar S; Thota G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):184-188. PubMed ID: 34257180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation.
    Urban K; Donnermeyer D; Schäfer E; Bürklein S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Dec; 21(9):2681-2687. PubMed ID: 28185091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Endovac irrigation system with conventional irrigation for removal of intracanal smear layer: an in vitro study.
    Abarajithan M; Dham S; Velmurugan N; Valerian-Albuquerque D; Ballal S; Senthilkumar H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Sep; 112(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 21664151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of the debridement efficacy and apical extrusion of dynamic and passive root canal irrigation systems.
    Alkahtani A; Al Khudhairi TD; Anil S
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 Feb; 14():12. PubMed ID: 24512441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of different final irrigation activation techniques on smear layer removal.
    Saber Sel-D; Hashem AA
    J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1272-5. PubMed ID: 21846546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal by Using Four Different Irrigation Solutions like Root Canal Irrigants: An
    Mankeliya S; Singhal RK; Gupta A; Jaiswal N; Pathak VK; Kushwah A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 May; 22(5):527-531. PubMed ID: 34318772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. FESEM evaluation of smear layer removal using different irrigant activation methods (EndoActivator, EndoVac, PUI and LAI). An in vitro study.
    Mancini M; Cerroni L; Iorio L; Dall'Asta L; Cianconi L
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):993-999. PubMed ID: 28721527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the EndoVac system and conventional needle irrigation on removal of the smear layer in primary molar root canals.
    Buldur B; Kapdan A
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Sep; 20(9):1168-1174. PubMed ID: 29072242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation and manual dynamic irrigation on smear layer removal from root canals in a closed apex in vitro model.
    Andrabi SM; Kumar A; Zia A; Iftekhar H; Alam S; Siddiqui S
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Aug; 5(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 23595996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Three Final Irrigation Activation Techniques: Effects on Canal Cleanness, Smear Layer Removal, and Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Two Root Canal Sealers.
    Turkel E; Onay EO; Ungor M
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2017 Dec; 35(12):672-681. PubMed ID: 28437194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of irrigant activation techniques in removing intracanal smear layer and debris from mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Virdee SS; Seymour DW; Farnell D; Bhamra G; Bhakta S
    Int Endod J; 2018 Jun; 51(6):605-621. PubMed ID: 29178166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of four different irrigation techniques combined with 60 °C 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA in smear layer removal.
    Guo X; Miao H; Li L; Zhang S; Zhou D; Lu Y; Wu L
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 Sep; 14():114. PubMed ID: 25201549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of three irrigation methods: SWEEPS, ultrasonic, and traditional irrigation, in smear layer and debris removal abilities in the root canal, beyond the fractured instrument.
    Vatanpour M; Toursavadkouhi S; Sajjad S
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Mar; 37():102707. PubMed ID: 34971819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of canal isthmus debridement efficacy of modified EndoVac technique with different irrigation systems.
    Thomas AR; Velmurugan N; Smita S; Jothilatha S
    J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1676-80. PubMed ID: 25052146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy (debris and smear layer removal) of hand and two NiTi rotary instrumentation systems (K3 and ProTaper): a SEM study.
    Reddy KB; Dash S; Kallepalli S; Vallikanthan S; Chakrapani N; Kalepu V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24858745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher file on smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation].
    Xin Y; Yang J; Song KY
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 37(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 30854818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Qualitative analysis of the removal of the smear layer in the apical third of curved roots: conventional irrigation versus activation systems.
    Blank-Gonçalves LM; Nabeshima CK; Martins GH; Machado ME
    J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1268-71. PubMed ID: 21846545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of final irrigant protocols for debris removal from simulated canal irregularities.
    Martins Justo A; Abreu da Rosa R; Santini MF; Cardoso Ferreira MB; Pereira JR; Húngaro Duarte MA; Reis Só MV
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2009-14. PubMed ID: 25266470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.