These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38956847)

  • 21. Efficacy of smear layer removal at the root tip by using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and erbium, chromium: yttrium, scandium, gallium garnet laser.
    Peeters HH; Suardita K
    J Endod; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1585-9. PubMed ID: 22000469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
    Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparative scanning electron microscopy evaluation of smear layer removal with chitosan and MTAD.
    Zhou H; Li Q; Wei L; Huang S; Zhao S
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Jan; 21(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 29411728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of smear layer and debris removal by stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) of sodium hypochlorite.
    Plotino G; Colangeli M; Özyürek T; DeDeus G; Panzetta C; Castagnola R; Grande NM; Marigo L
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jan; 25(1):237-245. PubMed ID: 32500405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of different sonic activation protocols on debridement efficacy in teeth with single-rooted canals.
    Niu LN; Luo XJ; Li GH; Bortoluzzi EA; Mao J; Chen JH; Gutmann JL; Pashley DH; Tay FR
    J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1001-9. PubMed ID: 24878251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effectiveness of different irrigant agitation techniques on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopy study.
    Rödig T; Döllmann S; Konietschke F; Drebenstedt S; Hülsmann M
    J Endod; 2010 Dec; 36(12):1983-7. PubMed ID: 21092817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Scanning electron microscopic analysis to compare the cleaning efficiency of three different irrigation systems at different root canal levels: an in vitro study.
    Tambe VH; Vishwas J; Ghonmode WN; Nagmode P; Agrawal GP; Balsaraf O
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jul; 15(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 25576109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Effectiveness of Different Irrigation Techniques on Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Primary Mandibular Second Molars: An
    Hachem CE; Nehme W; Kaloustian MK; Ghosn N; Daou M; Zogheib C; Karam M; Mhanna R; Macaluso V; Kharouf N; Chedid JCA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1173-1179. PubMed ID: 37073943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
    Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of maintaining apical patency on irrigant penetration into the apical third of root canals when using passive ultrasonic irrigation: an in vivo study.
    Vera J; Arias A; Romero M
    J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1276-8. PubMed ID: 21846547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of different final irrigant activation techniques on the bond strength of an epoxy resin-based endodontic sealer: a preliminary study.
    Topçuoğlu HS; Tuncay Ö; Demirbuga S; Dinçer AN; Arslan H
    J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):862-6. PubMed ID: 24862718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Smear Layer Removal Using Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and Different Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite.
    Orlowski NB; Schimdt TF; Teixeira CDS; Garcia LDFR; Savaris JM; Tay FR; Bortoluzzi EA
    J Endod; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1738-1744. PubMed ID: 32721483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.
    Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study.
    Metzger Z; Teperovich E; Cohen R; Zary R; Paqué F; Hülsmann M
    J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 20307746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effectiveness of oxidative potential water as a root canal irrigant.
    Hata G; Hayami S; Weine FS; Toda T
    Int Endod J; 2001 Jun; 34(4):308-17. PubMed ID: 11482143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of the antibacterial effect and smear layer removal using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming aided irrigation versus a conventional irrigation in single-rooted canals: an in vitro study.
    Zhu X; Yin X; Chang JW; Wang Y; Cheung GS; Zhang C
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2013 Aug; 31(8):371-7. PubMed ID: 23863104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Investigation of the effectiveness of sonic, ultrasonic and new laser-assisted irrigation activation methods on smear removal and tubular penetration.
    Uslu G; Gündoğar M; Üngör M; Özyürek T; Erkan E; Keskin NB
    Lasers Med Sci; 2023 Jan; 38(1):30. PubMed ID: 36595139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of laser and ultrasonic irrigation activation methods on smear and debris removal in traditional and conservative endodontic access cavities.
    Gündüz H; Özlek E
    Lasers Med Sci; 2023 Jun; 38(1):148. PubMed ID: 37358660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
    Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the Smear Layer Removal Ability of Various Rotary Files with/without Chemical Agents on Primary Teeth: An
    Abushanan A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Apr; 25(4):354-357. PubMed ID: 38956851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.