104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38956850)
1. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Fiber-reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement Restorations Immersed in Three Different Beverages:
George MA; Chandak SA; Khekade SH; Gahlod NB; Wasnik MB; V SM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Apr; 25(4):346-353. PubMed ID: 38956850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Microleakage of Nanoionomer and Nanocomposite Restorations, immersed in Fruit Drink, Fresh Fruit Juice and Soft Drink--An in vitro Study.
Katge F; Shitoot A; Pammi T; Mithiborwala S
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 26950814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Assessment of Marginal Micro Leakage of Different Esthetic Restorative Materials Used on Primary Teeth: An
Al Ghwainem A; Alqarni AS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Jan; 25(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 38514432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of microleakage between bulk esthetic materials versus resin-modified glass ionomer to restore Class II cavities in primary molars.
Gopinath VK
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(3):238-243. PubMed ID: 28762350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shear bond strength and microleakage of novel glass-ionomer cements: An
Meral E; Baseren NM
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Apr; 22(4):566-572. PubMed ID: 30975964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of protective coating on microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in primary molars: An
; Vishnurekha C; Annamalai S; Baghkomeh PN; Ditto Sharmin D
Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(6):744-748. PubMed ID: 30589002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An
Bansal D; Mahajan M
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 29256469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of conventional and modifications of glass ionomer cement in primary teeth: An in vitro study.
Shruthi AS; Nagaveni NB; Poornima P; Selvamani M; Madhushankari GS; Subba Reddy VV
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2015; 33(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 26381628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three different direct restorative materials (silver amalgam, glass ionomer cement, cention N), in Class II restorations using stereomicroscope: An
Mazumdar P; Das A; Das UK
Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(2):277-281. PubMed ID: 31169163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations: an in vitro study.
Hallett KB; Garcia-Godoy F
Dent Mater; 1993 Sep; 9(5):306-11. PubMed ID: 7995482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative microleakage evaluation of three different base materials in Class I cavity in deciduous molars in sandwich technique using dye penetration and dentin surface interface by scanning electron microscope.
Niranjan B; Shashikiran ND; Singla S; Thakur R; Dubey A; Maran S
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 27681395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass ionomer restorations in extracted primary molars.
Wadenya RO; Yego C; Mante FK
J Dent Child (Chic); 2010; 77(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 20359427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Cement and Chitosan-modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vitro Study.
Abraham D; Thomas AM; Chopra S; Koshy S
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014 Jan; 7(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 25206230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
