BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38956851)

  • 1. Evaluation of the Smear Layer Removal Ability of Various Rotary Files with/without Chemical Agents on Primary Teeth: An
    Abushanan A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Apr; 25(4):354-357. PubMed ID: 38956851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of Rotary Endodontic Instruments on Smear Layer Removal in Root Canals of Primary Teeth: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.
    Subramaniam P; Girish Babu KL; Tabrez TA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 26950816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative assessment of cleaning efficacy of two exclusive paediatric rotary files in root canals of primary teeth: An in vitro study.
    Bhattacharjee A; Singh RK; Patil RK; Chandra S; Singhai A; Singh US; Ansari AA; Khanna R
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2024 Jul; 34(4):474-484. PubMed ID: 38124259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of shaping ability of kedo-S square and fanta AF™ baby rotary files compared to manual K-files in root canal preparation of primary anterior teeth.
    El-Desouky SS; El Fahl BN; Kabbash IA; Hadwa SM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):340. PubMed ID: 38801642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
    Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of volumetric changes between two pediatric rotary files (Kedo-S plus, Kedo-SG blue) and manual files (hand K-files) during canal preparation of primary mandibular molars: an
    Suresh B; Jeevanandan G; Ravindran V; Vishwanathaiah S; Syed AA; Mokhtari N; Jaafari AHH; Dawood T; Maganur PC
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 Mar; 48(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 38548633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of volumetric changes following rotary and hand files' canal preparation of primary maxillary canine: an in vitro nano-CT analysis.
    Balaji S; Jeevanandan G; Ravindran V; Assiry AA; Vishwanathaiah S; Maganur PC
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2024 Apr; 25(2):227-235. PubMed ID: 38472709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the Efficiency to Remove the Infected Dentin
    Shanker K; Patil SB
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Sep; 16(Suppl 2):142-148. PubMed ID: 38078036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of instrumentation time and quality of obturation using paediatric hand and rotary file systems with conventional hand K-files for pulpectomy in primary mandibular molars: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
    Priyadarshini P; Jeevanandan G; Govindaraju L; Subramanian EMG
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2020 Dec; 21(6):693-701. PubMed ID: 32185634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy (debris and smear layer removal) of hand and two NiTi rotary instrumentation systems (K3 and ProTaper): a SEM study.
    Reddy KB; Dash S; Kallepalli S; Vallikanthan S; Chakrapani N; Kalepu V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24858745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Volumetric Analysis of Hand and Rotary Instrumentation, Root Canal Filling Techniques, and Obturation Materials in Primary Teeth Using Spiral CT.
    Yadav DBU; Varma RB; Kumar JS; Kumaran P; Xavier AM; Venugopal M; Thankappan N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Mar; 25(3):250-259. PubMed ID: 38690699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of different sonic activation protocols on debridement efficacy in teeth with single-rooted canals.
    Niu LN; Luo XJ; Li GH; Bortoluzzi EA; Mao J; Chen JH; Gutmann JL; Pashley DH; Tay FR
    J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1001-9. PubMed ID: 24878251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Smear Layer Evaluation on Root Canal Preparation with Manual and Rotary Techniques using EDTA as an Irrigant: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.
    Manjunatha M; Annapurna K; Sudhakar V; Sunil Kumar V; Hiremath VK; Shah A
    J Int Oral Health; 2013 Feb; 5(1):66-78. PubMed ID: 24155580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Capacity and Efficiency of Kedo-S Pediatric Rotary Files, Rotary ProTaper, and Hand K Files in Primary Molar Pulpectomy.
    Kalita S; Agarwal N; Jabin Z; Anand A
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021; 14(3):383-387. PubMed ID: 34720511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Kamel WH; Kataia EM
    J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
    Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computed Tomographic Assessment of Remaining Dentin and Risk of Perforation after Kedo-S and Mtwo Rotary Instrumentation in Root Canals of Primary Teeth: An
    Swaminathan K; Rakkesh KM; Haridoss S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(Suppl 1):S87-S91. PubMed ID: 35645498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of Smear Layer Removal and Penetration Depth of Root Canal Irrigant Using Different Irrigation Activation Systems: A Comparative Study.
    Pujari MD; Das M; Das A; Kamath DG; Henry J; Shyam A; Alhaleis DM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Apr; 25(4):331-334. PubMed ID: 38956847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of 3D conforming nickel titanium rotary instruments in eliminating canal wall bacteria from oval-shaped root canals.
    Bortoluzzi EA; Carlon D; Meghil MM; El-Awady AR; Niu L; Bergeron BE; Susin L; Cutler CW; Pashley DH; Tay FR
    J Dent; 2015 May; 43(5):597-604. PubMed ID: 25593001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.