These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38958413)

  • 1. Docking Score ML: Target-Specific Machine Learning Models Improving Docking-Based Virtual Screening in 155 Targets.
    Liu H; Hu B; Chen P; Wang X; Wang H; Wang S; Wang J; Lin B; Cheng M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38958413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MILCDock: Machine Learning Enhanced Consensus Docking for Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery.
    Morris CJ; Stern JA; Stark B; Christopherson M; Della Corte D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5342-5350. PubMed ID: 36342217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. LIT-PCBA: An Unbiased Data Set for Machine Learning and Virtual Screening.
    Tran-Nguyen VK; Jacquemard C; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4263-4273. PubMed ID: 32282202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Development of Target-Specific Machine Learning Models as Scoring Functions for Docking-Based Target Prediction.
    Nogueira MS; Koch O
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Mar; 59(3):1238-1252. PubMed ID: 30802041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Virtual Screening with Gnina 1.0.
    Sunseri J; Koes DR
    Molecules; 2021 Dec; 26(23):. PubMed ID: 34885952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving protein-ligand docking and screening accuracies by incorporating a scoring function correction term.
    Zheng L; Meng J; Jiang K; Lan H; Wang Z; Lin M; Li W; Guo H; Wei Y; Mu Y
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 May; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 35289359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SCORCH: Improving structure-based virtual screening with machine learning classifiers, data augmentation, and uncertainty estimation.
    McGibbon M; Money-Kyrle S; Blay V; Houston DR
    J Adv Res; 2023 Apr; 46():135-147. PubMed ID: 35901959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Hybrid Docking and Machine Learning Approach to Enhance the Performance of Virtual Screening Carried out on Protein-Protein Interfaces.
    Singh N; Villoutreix BO
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Nov; 23(22):. PubMed ID: 36430841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protein-Ligand Docking in the Machine-Learning Era.
    Yang C; Chen EA; Zhang Y
    Molecules; 2022 Jul; 27(14):. PubMed ID: 35889440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. TB-IECS: an accurate machine learning-based scoring function for virtual screening.
    Zhang X; Shen C; Jiang D; Zhang J; Ye Q; Xu L; Hou T; Pan P; Kang Y
    J Cheminform; 2023 Jul; 15(1):63. PubMed ID: 37403155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Employing Molecular Conformations for Ligand-Based Virtual Screening with Equivariant Graph Neural Network and Deep Multiple Instance Learning.
    Gu Y; Li J; Kang H; Zhang B; Zheng S
    Molecules; 2023 Aug; 28(16):. PubMed ID: 37630234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Graph Convolutional Capsule Regression (GCCR): A Model for Accelerated Filtering of Novel Potential Candidates for SARS-CoV-2 based on Binding Affinity.
    Krishnan A; Vinod D
    Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2024; 20(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 37005531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PLANET: A Multi-objective Graph Neural Network Model for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.
    Zhang X; Gao H; Wang H; Chen Z; Zhang Z; Chen X; Li Y; Qi Y; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Apr; 64(7):2205-2220. PubMed ID: 37319418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving Docking-Based Virtual Screening Ability by Integrating Multiple Energy Auxiliary Terms from Molecular Docking Scoring.
    Ye WL; Shen C; Xiong GL; Ding JJ; Lu AP; Hou TJ; Cao DS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4216-4230. PubMed ID: 32352294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards Effective Consensus Scoring in Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Nhat Phuong D; Flower DR; Chattopadhyay S; Chattopadhyay AK
    Interdiscip Sci; 2023 Mar; 15(1):131-145. PubMed ID: 36550341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning from Docked Ligands: Ligand-Based Features Rescue Structure-Based Scoring Functions When Trained on Docked Poses.
    Boyles F; Deane CM; Morris GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5329-5341. PubMed ID: 34469150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FINDSITE
    Zhou H; Cao H; Skolnick J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Nov; 58(11):2343-2354. PubMed ID: 30278128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. True Accuracy of Fast Scoring Functions to Predict High-Throughput Screening Data from Docking Poses: The Simpler the Better.
    Tran-Nguyen VK; Bret G; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Jun; 61(6):2788-2797. PubMed ID: 34109796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy or novelty: what can we gain from target-specific machine-learning-based scoring functions in virtual screening?
    Shen C; Weng G; Zhang X; Leung EL; Yao X; Pang J; Chai X; Li D; Wang E; Cao D; Hou T
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33418562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.