These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38958413)

  • 21. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy.
    Cross JB; Thompson DC; Rai BK; Baber JC; Fan KY; Hu Y; Humblet C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Beware of the generic machine learning-based scoring functions in structure-based virtual screening.
    Shen C; Hu Y; Wang Z; Zhang X; Pang J; Wang G; Zhong H; Xu L; Cao D; Hou T
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32484221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improving Docking-Based Virtual Screening Ability by Integrating Multiple Energy Auxiliary Terms from Molecular Docking Scoring.
    Ye WL; Shen C; Xiong GL; Ding JJ; Lu AP; Hou TJ; Cao DS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4216-4230. PubMed ID: 32352294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite.
    Forli S; Huey R; Pique ME; Sanner MF; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ
    Nat Protoc; 2016 May; 11(5):905-19. PubMed ID: 27077332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Protein-Ligand Empirical Interaction Components for Virtual Screening.
    Yan Y; Wang W; Sun Z; Zhang JZH; Ji C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Aug; 57(8):1793-1806. PubMed ID: 28678484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Learning from Docked Ligands: Ligand-Based Features Rescue Structure-Based Scoring Functions When Trained on Docked Poses.
    Boyles F; Deane CM; Morris GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5329-5341. PubMed ID: 34469150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy or novelty: what can we gain from target-specific machine-learning-based scoring functions in virtual screening?
    Shen C; Weng G; Zhang X; Leung EL; Yao X; Pang J; Chai X; Li D; Wang E; Cao D; Hou T
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33418562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Machine Learning Classification Models to Improve the Docking-based Screening: A Case of PI3K-Tankyrase Inhibitors.
    Berishvili VP; Voronkov AE; Radchenko EV; Palyulin VA
    Mol Inform; 2018 Nov; 37(11):e1800030. PubMed ID: 29901257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Energy-based graph convolutional networks for scoring protein docking models.
    Cao Y; Shen Y
    Proteins; 2020 Aug; 88(8):1091-1099. PubMed ID: 32144844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comprehensive assessment of flexible-ligand docking algorithms: current effectiveness and challenges.
    Huang SY
    Brief Bioinform; 2018 Sep; 19(5):982-994. PubMed ID: 28334282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Advancing Ligand Docking through Deep Learning: Challenges and Prospects in Virtual Screening.
    Zhang X; Shen C; Zhang H; Kang Y; Hsieh CY; Hou T
    Acc Chem Res; 2024 May; 57(10):1500-1509. PubMed ID: 38577892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Towards Effective Consensus Scoring in Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Nhat Phuong D; Flower DR; Chattopadhyay S; Chattopadhyay AK
    Interdiscip Sci; 2023 Mar; 15(1):131-145. PubMed ID: 36550341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computationally predicting binding affinity in protein-ligand complexes: free energy-based simulations and machine learning-based scoring functions.
    Wang DD; Zhu M; Yan H
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32591817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cosolvent-Based Protein Pharmacophore for Ligand Enrichment in Virtual Screening.
    Arcon JP; Defelipe LA; Lopez ED; Burastero O; Modenutti CP; Barril X; Marti MA; Turjanski AG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Aug; 59(8):3572-3583. PubMed ID: 31373819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Small Step Toward Generalizability: Training a Machine Learning Scoring Function for Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Scantlebury J; Vost L; Carbery A; Hadfield TE; Turnbull OM; Brown N; Chenthamarakshan V; Das P; Grosjean H; von Delft F; Deane CM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 May; 63(10):2960-2974. PubMed ID: 37166179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. PLANET: A Multi-objective Graph Neural Network Model for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.
    Zhang X; Gao H; Wang H; Chen Z; Zhang Z; Chen X; Li Y; Qi Y; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Apr; 64(7):2205-2220. PubMed ID: 37319418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hidden bias in the DUD-E dataset leads to misleading performance of deep learning in structure-based virtual screening.
    Chen L; Cruz A; Ramsey S; Dickson CJ; Duca JS; Hornak V; Koes DR; Kurtzman T
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220113. PubMed ID: 31430292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Delta Machine Learning to Improve Scoring-Ranking-Screening Performances of Protein-Ligand Scoring Functions.
    Yang C; Zhang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Jun; 62(11):2696-2712. PubMed ID: 35579568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Epigenetic target identification strategy based on multi-feature learning.
    Chen L; Gu R; Li Y; Liu H; Han W; Yan Y; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Jiang Y
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2024 Jul; 42(11):5946-5962. PubMed ID: 37827992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.