These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38958941)

  • 1. Evaluating Baseline Data in Clinical Trials-Can I Apply the Results?
    Holmes JM
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2024 Aug; 142(8):730-731. PubMed ID: 38958941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-tailed tests and a statistical significance at 0.05: what do they mean?
    Campbell M
    Midwifery; 2004 Jun; 20(2):142-3. PubMed ID: 15177857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Handling of Missing Data.
    Budhiraja P; Kaplan B; Mustafa RA
    Transplantation; 2020 Jan; 104(1):24-26. PubMed ID: 31365474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Number needed to harm.
    Safer DJ; Zito JM
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2013 Nov; 201(11):1003. PubMed ID: 24177491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Number needed to harm can be clinically useful: a response to Safer and Zito.
    Citrome L; Ketter TA
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2013 Nov; 201(11):1001-2. PubMed ID: 24177490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the need to adjust for multiplicity in confirmatory clinical trials with master protocols.
    Stallard N; Todd S; Parashar D; Kimani PK; Renfro LA
    Ann Oncol; 2019 Apr; 30(4):506-509. PubMed ID: 30715156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Addressing missing data in clinical trials.
    van der Laan M; Lorenz TJ
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(2):135. PubMed ID: 21768593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ethics of sample size: two-sided testing and one-sided thinking.
    Knottnerus JA; Bouter LM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 54(2):109-10. PubMed ID: 11166523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Designed Learning: Missing Data in Clinical Research.
    Stack CB; Butterworth T; Goldin R
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 May; 168(10):744. PubMed ID: 29632949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomarker Guidelines for High-Dimensional Genomic Studies in Transplantation: Adding Method to the Madness.
    Kurian SM; Whisenant T; Mas V; Heilman R; Abecassis M; Salomon DR; Moss A; Kaplan B
    Transplantation; 2017 Mar; 101(3):457-463. PubMed ID: 28212255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reply to Drs. Olanow and Rascol.
    Ahlskog JE; Uitti RJ
    Neurology; 2010 Apr; 74(14):1151. PubMed ID: 20368636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Key design considerations for adaptive clinical trials: a primer for clinicians.
    Thorlund K; Haggstrom J; Park JJ; Mills EJ
    BMJ; 2018 Mar; 360():k698. PubMed ID: 29519932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards a standard code of practice for evaluating the effectiveness of treatments for hypersensitive dentine.
    Orchardson R; Gangarosa LP; Holland GR; Pashley DH
    Arch Oral Biol; 1994; 39 Suppl():121S-124S. PubMed ID: 7702460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Qualitative and mixed methods research in trials.
    Snowdon C
    Trials; 2015 Dec; 16():558. PubMed ID: 26646545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical analyses for research in arthritis when assessing change.
    Hewett JE; Anderson SK; Minor MA
    Arthritis Care Res; 1992 Jun; 5(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 1390967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What is next in ALS clinical trials?
    Sorenson EJ
    Neurology; 2007 Aug; 69(8):719-20. PubMed ID: 17709702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standards for veterinary clinical trials.
    Boothe DM; Slater MR
    Adv Vet Sci Comp Med; 1995; 39():191-252. PubMed ID: 8578976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. IPEG guideline on statistical design and analysis for pharmacodynamic trials. International Pharmaco-EEG Group.
    Ferber G; Abt K; Fichte K; Luthringer R
    Neuropsychobiology; 1999; 39(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 10072666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical effectiveness: an approach to clinical trial design more relevant to clinical practice, acknowledging the importance of individual differences.
    Moore RA; Derry S; McQuay HJ; Straube S; Aldington D; Wiffen P; Bell RF; Kalso E; Rowbotham MC;
    Pain; 2010 May; 149(2):173-176. PubMed ID: 19748185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 'Is this treatment worth while?' How to read the medical journals.
    Rheeder P; Ker JA
    S Afr Med J; 2000 Jan; 90(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 10721386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.