These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38961832)

  • 1. Association of maximum uterine diameter with postoperative complications in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy: A retrospective cohort study.
    Chu YQ; Ding DC
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Nov; 167(2):851-858. PubMed ID: 38961832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uterine weight and complications after abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy.
    Louie M; Strassle PD; Moulder JK; Dizon AM; Schiff LD; Carey ET
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):480.e1-480.e8. PubMed ID: 29959931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of complications, conversion rate, malignancy rate, and, surgeon's experience in laparoscopic assisted supracervical hysterectomy (LASH) of 1274 large uteri: A retrospective study.
    Tchartchian G; Bojahr B; Krentel H; De Wilde RL
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Dec; 101(12):1450-1457. PubMed ID: 36203317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk of complication at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prediction model built from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.
    Pepin KJ; Cook EF; Cohen SL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 223(4):555.e1-555.e7. PubMed ID: 32247844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Supracervical vs. assisted vaginal.
    Schwartz RO
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Aug; 39(8):625-30. PubMed ID: 7996527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): an implementation study in 1,952 patients with an analysis of risk factors for conversion to laparotomy and complications, and of procedure-specific re-operations.
    Wallwiener M; Taran FA; Rothmund R; Kasperkowiak A; Auwärter G; Ganz A; Kraemer B; Abele H; Schönfisch B; Isaacson KB; Brucker SY
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Dec; 288(6):1329-39. PubMed ID: 23775263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
    El-Mowafi D; Madkour W; Lall C; Wenger JM
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2004 May; 11(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 15200770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes.
    Sarmini OR; Lefholz K; Froeschke HP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 15904614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri greater than 500 grams.
    Shen H; Torng PL; Chen IH; Hsu HC
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jul; 59(4):502-507. PubMed ID: 32653120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy for the larger uterus (>500 g): a case series and literature review.
    McGurk L; Oliver R; Odejinmi F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Feb; 295(2):397-405. PubMed ID: 27848016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative analysis of different laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures.
    Hobson DT; Imudia AN; Al-Safi ZA; Shade G; Kruger M; Diamond MP; Awonuga AO
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 May; 285(5):1353-61. PubMed ID: 22124531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perioperative complication rate in 1706 patients after a standardized laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy technique.
    Bojahr B; Raatz D; Schonleber G; Abri C; Ohlinger R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 16698522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
    Milad MP; Morrison K; Sokol A; Miller D; Kirkpatrick L
    Surg Endosc; 2001 Mar; 15(3):286-8. PubMed ID: 11344430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
    Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
    Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complication rate of uterine morcellation in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort study.
    Smits RM; De Kruif JH; Van Heteren CF
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():179-82. PubMed ID: 26943477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relevance of Uterine Weight for Predicting Surgical Complications in Minimally Invasive Benign Hysterectomy.
    Mouro S; Hamed JLC; Whiteside JL; Tumin D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 30(12):976-982. PubMed ID: 37611741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy or Total Vaginal Hysterectomy for Large Uteri.
    Sailofsky S; Darin C; Alfahmy A; Sheyn D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 137(3):445-453. PubMed ID: 33543889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hospital variation in responses to safety warnings about power morcellation in hysterectomy.
    Xu X; Desai VB; Wright JD; Lin H; Schwartz PE; Gross CP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):589.e1-589.e13. PubMed ID: 33359176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
    Richards SR; Simpkins S
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1995 Aug; 2(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 9050598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.