These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38962711)

  • 21. Medical assessment in the age of digitalisation.
    Egarter S; Mutschler A; Tekian A; Norcini J; Brass K
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Mar; 20(1):101. PubMed ID: 32234051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Answering questions in a co-created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise.
    Guilding C; Pye RE; Butler S; Atkinson M; Field E
    Pharmacol Res Perspect; 2021 Aug; 9(4):e00833. PubMed ID: 34309243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Maximizing Academic Integrity While Minimizing Stress in the Virtual Classroom.
    Novick PA; Lee J; Wei S; Mundorff EC; Santangelo JR; Sonbuchner TM
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2022 Apr; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 35496711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Item analysis of examinations in the Faculty of Medicine of Tunis.
    Hermi A; Achour W
    Tunis Med; 2016 Apr; 94(4):247-252. PubMed ID: 27704506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ensuring the quality of multiple-choice exams administered to small cohorts: A cautionary tale.
    Young M; Cummings BA; St-Onge C
    Perspect Med Educ; 2017 Feb; 6(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 28050882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Are Multiple Choice Questions for Post Graduate Dental Entrance Examinations Spot On?-Item Analysis of MCQs in Prosthodontics in India.
    Shigli K; Nayak SS; Gali S; Sankeshwari B; Fulari D; Shyam Kishore K; Upadhya P N; Jirge V
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2018 Oct; 110(5):455-458. PubMed ID: 30129514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of mistakes on multiple-choice question and fill-in-the-blank examinations: A retrospective analysis.
    He X; Zhang N
    J Chiropr Educ; 2024 Oct; 38(2):100-105. PubMed ID: 39265994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of Multiple-Choice Questions by Item Analysis, from an Online Internal Assessment of 6
    Bhattacherjee S; Mukherjee A; Bhandari K; Rout AJ
    Indian J Community Med; 2022; 47(1):92-95. PubMed ID: 35368481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of Multiple-Choice Question Formats in a First Year Medical Physiology Course.
    Wilson LB; DiStefano C; Wang H; Blanck EL
    J CME; 2024; 13(1):2390264. PubMed ID: 39157702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A successful intervention to improve conceptual knowledge of medical students who rely on memorization of disclosed items.
    Heber S; Grasl MC; Volf I
    Front Physiol; 2023; 14():1258149. PubMed ID: 37711461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quality of multiple-choice questions in medical internship qualification examination determined by item response theory at Debre Tabor University, Ethiopia.
    Belay LM; Sendekie TY; Eyowas FA
    BMC Med Educ; 2022 Aug; 22(1):635. PubMed ID: 35989323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of 3- and 4-option multiple-choice items for medical subspecialty in-training examinations.
    Chen D; Harman AE; Sun H; Ye T; Gaiser RR
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Apr; 23(1):286. PubMed ID: 37106417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course.
    Royal K; Dorman D
    Vet Sci; 2018 Jun; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 29890727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in the Surgery Course for an Integrated Curriculum, University of Bisha College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia.
    Al Ameer AY
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50441. PubMed ID: 38222171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Electronic assessment of clinical reasoning in clerkships: A mixed-methods comparison of long-menu key-feature problems with context-rich single best answer questions.
    Huwendiek S; Reichert F; Duncker C; de Leng BA; van der Vleuten CPM; Muijtjens AMM; Bosse HM; Haag M; Hoffmann GF; Tönshoff B; Dolmans D
    Med Teach; 2017 May; 39(5):476-485. PubMed ID: 28281369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of images on item statistics in multiple choice anatomy examinations.
    Notebaert AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 27472765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Promoting an active form of learning out-of-class via answering online "study questions" leads to higher than expected exam scores in General Biology.
    Gibson SI
    PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1322. PubMed ID: 26500828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do images influence assessment in anatomy? Exploring the effect of images on item difficulty and item discrimination.
    Vorstenbosch MA; Klaassen TP; Kooloos JG; Bolhuis SM; Laan RF
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22674609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of performance and perceptions of electronic vs. paper multiple-choice exams.
    Washburn S; Herman J; Stewart R
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2017 Dec; 41(4):548-555. PubMed ID: 29066605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A neuroanatomy lab practical exam format in alignment with the universal design for learning framework.
    Kimpo RR; Puder B
    Anat Sci Educ; 2023; 16(6):1046-1057. PubMed ID: 37460449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.