These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38962961)

  • 41. Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography in the management of coronary artery disease: technology and clinical update.
    Nakanishi R; Budoff MJ
    Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2016; 12():269-78. PubMed ID: 27382296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Therapeutic Decision Making.
    Tesche C; Vliegenthart R; Duguay TM; De Cecco CN; Albrecht MH; De Santis D; Langenbach MC; Varga-Szemes A; Jacobs BE; Jochheim D; Baquet M; Bayer RR; Litwin SE; Hoffmann E; Steinberg DH; Schoepf UJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 120(12):2121-2127. PubMed ID: 29102036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions: Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard.
    Budoff MJ; Nakazato R; Mancini GB; Gransar H; Leipsic J; Berman DS; Min JK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 26897669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using fractional flow reserve (FFR) profiles derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRCT) and invasive pressure measurements (FFRINV): Importance of the site of measurement and implications for patient referral for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Cami E; Tagami T; Raff G; Fonte TA; Renard B; Gallagher MJ; Chinnaiyan K; Bilolikar A; Fan A; Hafeez A; Safian RD
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(6):480-492. PubMed ID: 30274795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Diagnostic performance of on-site computed CT-fractional flow reserve based on fluid structure interactions: comparison with invasive fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio.
    Fujimoto S; Kawasaki T; Kumamaru KK; Kawaguchi Y; Dohi T; Okonogi T; Ri K; Yamada S; Takamura K; Kato E; Kato Y; Hiki M; Okazaki S; Aoki S; Mitsouras D; Rybicki FJ; Daida H
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 20(3):343-352. PubMed ID: 30107511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Non-invasive CT-derived fractional flow reserve and static rest and stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.
    Ko BS; Linde JJ; Ihdayhid AR; Norgaard BL; Kofoed KF; Sørgaard M; Adams D; Crossett M; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 35(11):2103-2112. PubMed ID: 31273632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Additional value of deep learning computed tomographic angiography-based fractional flow reserve in detecting coronary stenosis and predicting outcomes.
    Li Y; Qiu H; Hou Z; Zheng J; Li J; Yin Y; Gao R
    Acta Radiol; 2022 Jan; 63(1):133-140. PubMed ID: 33423530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Investigation of the predictive value of a novel algorithm based on coronary CT angiography regarding fractional flow reserve and revascularization in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
    Hou C; Lu Y; Ma Y; Li Q; Liu C; Lu M; Cao C; Liu J
    Heart Vessels; 2024 Mar; 39(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 37897523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Machine Learning From Quantitative Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Predicts Fractional Flow Reserve-Defined Ischemia and Impaired Myocardial Blood Flow.
    Lin A; van Diemen PA; Motwani M; McElhinney P; Otaki Y; Han D; Kwan A; Tzolos E; Klein E; Kuronuma K; Grodecki K; Shou B; Rios R; Manral N; Cadet S; Danad I; Driessen RS; Berman DS; Nørgaard BL; Slomka PJ; Knaapen P; Dey D
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Oct; 15(10):e014369. PubMed ID: 36252116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps).
    Nørgaard BL; Leipsic J; Gaur S; Seneviratne S; Ko BS; Ito H; Jensen JM; Mauri L; De Bruyne B; Bezerra H; Osawa K; Marwan M; Naber C; Erglis A; Park SJ; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Lassen JF; Bøtker HE; Achenbach S;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Apr; 63(12):1145-1155. PubMed ID: 24486266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. On-site assessment of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve in comparison with myocardial perfusion imaging and invasive fractional flow reserve.
    Miyajima K; Motoyama S; Sarai M; Kawai H; Nagahara Y; Matsumoto R; Fujiwara W; Muramatsu T; Takahashi H; Naruse H; Ishii J; Kondo T; Narula J; Izawa H; Ozaki Y
    Heart Vessels; 2020 Oct; 35(10):1331-1340. PubMed ID: 32350637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Plaque Analysis Classifies the Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) Stenosis and Plaque Burden Categories: Association of the Plaque Features, Fat Attenuation Index, Coronary Computed Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve, and the Combination of Stenosis and Calcification.
    Chen W; Nie J; Zhang M; Zhu Z; Zhou Y; Wu Q; He X
    Clin Cardiol; 2024 Jun; 47(6):e24305. PubMed ID: 38884449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Relationship of the Duke jeopardy score combined with minimal lumen diameter as assessed by computed tomography angiography to the hemodynamic relevance of coronary artery stenosis.
    Yu M; Zhao Y; Li W; Lu Z; Wei M; Zhou W; Zhang J
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(3):247-254. PubMed ID: 29598929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Prognostic Implications of Plaque Characteristics and Stenosis Severity in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.
    Lee JM; Choi KH; Koo BK; Park J; Kim J; Hwang D; Rhee TM; Kim HY; Jung HW; Kim KJ; Yoshiaki K; Shin ES; Doh JH; Chang HJ; Cho YK; Yoon HJ; Nam CW; Hur SH; Wang J; Chen S; Kuramitsu S; Tanaka N; Matsuo H; Akasaka T
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2019 May; 73(19):2413-2424. PubMed ID: 31097161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived vs Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment: Meta-Analysis with Subgroup Evaluation of Intermediate Stenosis.
    Baumann S; Renker M; Hetjens S; Fuller SR; Becher T; Loßnitzer D; Lehmann R; Akin I; Borggrefe M; Lang S; Wichmann JL; Schoepf UJ
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1402-1411. PubMed ID: 27639627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Noninvasive CT-Derived FFR Based on Structural and Fluid Analysis: A Comparison With Invasive FFR for Detection of Functionally Significant Stenosis.
    Ko BS; Cameron JD; Munnur RK; Wong DTL; Fujisawa Y; Sakaguchi T; Hirohata K; Hislop-Jambrich J; Fujimoto S; Takamura K; Crossett M; Leung M; Kuganesan A; Malaiapan Y; Nasis A; Troupis J; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jun; 10(6):663-673. PubMed ID: 27771399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Prognostic value of CT myocardial perfusion imaging and CT-derived fractional flow reserve for major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease.
    van Assen M; De Cecco CN; Eid M; von Knebel Doeberitz P; Scarabello M; Lavra F; Bauer MJ; Mastrodicasa D; Duguay TM; Zaki B; Lo GG; Choe YH; Wang Y; Sahbaee P; Tesche C; Oudkerk M; Vliegenthart R; Schoepf UJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2019; 13(3):26-33. PubMed ID: 30796003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Agreement of Fractional Flow Reserve Estimated by Computed Tomography With Invasively Measured Fractional Flow Reserve: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Faulder TI; Prematunga K; Moloi SB; Faulder LE; Jones R; Moxon JV
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2024 May; 13(10):e034552. PubMed ID: 38726901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of fractional myocardial mass, a vessel-specific myocardial mass-at-risk, with coronary angiographic scoring systems for predicting myocardial ischemia.
    Kim HY; Doh JH; Lim HS; Nam CW; Shin ES; Koo BK; Lee JM; Park TK; Yang JH; Song YB; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Gwon HC; Lee SH; Kim SM; Choe Y; Choi JH
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2020; 14(4):322-329. PubMed ID: 31786052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Trans-lesional fractional flow reserve gradient as derived from coronary CT improves patient management: ADVANCE registry.
    Takagi H; Leipsic JA; McNamara N; Martin I; Fairbairn TA; Akasaka T; Nørgaard BL; Berman DS; Chinnaiyan K; Hurwitz-Koweek LM; Pontone G; Kawasaki T; Rønnow Sand NP; Jensen JM; Amano T; Poon M; Øvrehus KA; Sonck J; Rabbat MG; Mullen S; De Bruyne B; Rogers C; Matsuo H; Bax JJ; Douglas PS; Patel MR; Nieman K; Ihdayhid AR
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2022; 16(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 34518113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.