These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38963245)

  • 1. Recent Australian Legislative Developments in the Regulation of Assisted Reproductive Technology.
    Smith M
    J Law Med; 2024 Jun; 31(2):244-257. PubMed ID: 38963245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reviewing regulation of assisted reproductive technology in New South Wales: the Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2007 (NSW).
    Smith M
    J Law Med; 2008 Aug; 16(1):120-31. PubMed ID: 18807800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Access to Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Australia: Time for Legislative Change in Queensland and the Northern Territory to Remove the Ability to Discriminate Based on Relationship Status or Sexuality.
    McGrady A; Smith M; Allan S
    J Law Med; 2023 May; 30(1):191-211. PubMed ID: 37271959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New assisted reproductive technology laws in Victoria: a genuine overhaul or just cut and paste?
    Thorpe R; Petersen K; Pitts MK; Baker HW
    J Law Med; 2011 Jun; 18(4):835-50. PubMed ID: 21774278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regulating assisted reproductive technologies in Victoria: the impact of changing policy concerning the accessibility of in vitro fertilisation for preimplantation tissue-typing.
    Smith MK
    J Law Med; 2012 Jun; 19(4):820-34. PubMed ID: 22908622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Australia after Cresswell and Chapman: A Legal and Regulatory Paradox, or an Opportunity for Uniformity?
    Mills CD
    J Law Med; 2020 Apr; 27(3):741-761. PubMed ID: 32406633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time for a national approach to donor conception in Australia.
    Bennett B
    J Law Med; 2011 Sep; 19(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 21988005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Posthumous conception in Australia - legal and ethical considerations.
    Polyakov A; Piskopos J; Rozen G
    Med Leg J; 2024 Jun; 92(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 37999639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies.
    Bernier L; Grégoire D
    J Med Ethics; 2004 Dec; 30(6):527-32. PubMed ID: 15574437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2021- Provisions and Implications.
    Gowda M; Deepthi B; Nichanahalli KS
    Indian Pediatr; 2024 Jul; 61(7):675-681. PubMed ID: 38803100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. History of regulation of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the USA: a work in progress.
    Chang WY; DeCherney AH
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2003 May; 6(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 12869786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Desperately seeking donors: the 'saviour sibling' decision in Quintavalle v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (UK).
    Hocking BA; Guy S
    Aust J Fam Law; 2005 Aug; 19(2):144-52. PubMed ID: 17058339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The regulation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis: is there anything the United Kingdom can learn from the Australian experience?
    de Souza M
    J Law Med; 2012 Sep; 20(1):165-77. PubMed ID: 23156654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Canada's Assisted Human Reproductive Act: is it scientific censorship, or a reasoned approach to the regulation of rapidly emerging reproductive technologies?
    Rasmussen C
    Sask Law Rev; 2004; 67(1):97-135. PubMed ID: 16485361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assisted reproduction: managing an unruly technology.
    Levitt M
    Health Care Anal; 2004 Mar; 12(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 15186079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Banning reproductive travel: Turkey's ART legislation and third-party assisted reproduction.
    Gürtin ZB
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Nov; 23(5):555-64. PubMed ID: 21962527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Legislation on the practice of assisted reproduction in Western Australia.
    Yovich JL; Matson PL
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1996 Mar; 13(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 11644841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Discriminatory Legal Barrier of Partner Consent in Victorian ART Law: EHT18 v Melbourne IVF.
    Taylor-Sands MM
    Med Law Rev; 2019 Aug; 27(3):509-518. PubMed ID: 31006032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The regulation of assisted reproductive technology: a comparative study of permissive and prescriptive laws and policies.
    Petersen K
    J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):483-97. PubMed ID: 12194479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The devil we know: the implications of bill C-38 for assisted human reproduction in Canada.
    Cattapan A; Cohen SR
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Jul; 35(7):654-6. PubMed ID: 23876644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.