These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38964352)

  • 21. Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications.
    Hempel S; Shekelle PG; Liu JL; Sherwood Danz M; Foy R; Lim YW; Motala A; Rubenstein LV
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2015 Dec; 24(12):796-804. PubMed ID: 26311020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines.
    Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Bossuyt PM; Boutron I; Hoffmann T; Mulrow CD; Shamseer L; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 118():60-68. PubMed ID: 31740319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development of a quality assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO) of HIV prevalence in men having sex with men and associated risk behaviours.
    Wong WC; Cheung CS; Hart GJ
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 5():23. PubMed ID: 19014686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development of a Patient-Reported Symptom Item Bank for Patients with Hepatobiliary or Pancreatic Malignancies: A Systematic Review.
    Zhang J; Zhan Y; Chen J; Kang D; Xiang R; Zhang R; Zhang Y; Pu Y; Zhang J; Zhang L; Huang Y; Gong R; Su X; Nie Y; Shi Q
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2023; 17():199-207. PubMed ID: 36698859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.
    Gomersall JS; Jadotte YT; Xue Y; Lockwood S; Riddle D; Preda A
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26288063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Content development for a new item-bank for measuring multifocal contact lens performance.
    Albero-Ros E; Lorente-Velázquez A; González-Pérez M
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2024 Feb; 8(1):16. PubMed ID: 38329635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of tools for assessing the methodological quality of primary and secondary studies in health technology assessment reports in Germany.
    Dreier M; Borutta B; Stahmeyer J; Krauth C; Walter U
    GMS Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jun; 6():Doc07. PubMed ID: 21289880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical instruments: reliability and validity critical appraisal.
    Brink Y; Louw QA
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Dec; 18(6):1126-32. PubMed ID: 21689217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Critical appraisal in rapid systematic reviews of COVID-19 studies: implementation of the Quality Criteria Checklist (QCC).
    Duval D; Pearce-Smith N; Palmer JC; Sarfo-Annin JK; Rudd P; Clark R
    Syst Rev; 2023 Mar; 12(1):55. PubMed ID: 36973811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2008; 6(15):583-632. PubMed ID: 27819972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reporting Methodology of Neurosurgical Studies Utilizing the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.
    Yolcu Y; Wahood W; Alvi MA; Kerezoudis P; Habermann EB; Bydon M
    Neurosurgery; 2020 Jan; 86(1):46-60. PubMed ID: 31225602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The GRACE checklist for rating the quality of observational studies of comparative effectiveness: a tale of hope and caution.
    Dreyer NA; Velentgas P; Westrich K; Dubois R
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2014 Mar; 20(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 24564810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development and validation of MyCommunication-Adults, a self-report communicative participation measure.
    Ter Wal N; Terwee CB; Visser-Meily JMA; Alons E; Dijkhuis L; Gerrits E; Ewijk LV
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39297579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Characteristics, methodological, and reporting quality of scoping reviews published in nursing journals: A systematic review.
    Woo BFY; Tam WWS; Williams MY; Ow Yong JQY; Cheong ZY; Ong YC; Poon SN; Goh YS
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2023 Jul; 55(4):874-885. PubMed ID: 36494752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Health systems guidance appraisal--a critical interpretive synthesis.
    Ako-Arrey DE; Brouwers MC; Lavis JN; Giacomini MK;
    Implement Sci; 2016 Jan; 11():9. PubMed ID: 26800684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reducing unemployment benefit duration to increase job finding rates: a systematic review.
    Filges T; Jonassen AB; Jørgensen AK
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-194. PubMed ID: 37131392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interventions to reduce ambient particulate matter air pollution and their effect on health.
    Burns J; Boogaard H; Polus S; Pfadenhauer LM; Rohwer AC; van Erp AM; Turley R; Rehfuess E
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 May; 5(5):CD010919. PubMed ID: 31106396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quality of systematic reviews of the Foods with Function Claims registered at the Consumer Affairs Agency Web site in Japan: a prospective systematic review.
    Kamioka H; Tsutani K; Origasa H; Yoshizaki T; Kitayuguchi J; Shimada M; Tang W; Takano-Ohmuro H
    Nutr Res; 2017 Apr; 40():21-31. PubMed ID: 28473057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools.
    Katrak P; Bialocerkowski AE; Massy-Westropp N; Kumar S; Grimmer KA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Sep; 4():22. PubMed ID: 15369598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.