These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38965087)

  • 1. What is the early fate of adjacent segmental lordosis compensation at L3-4 and L5-S1 following a lateral versus transforaminal lumbar Interbody Fusion at L4-5?
    Kim M; Kumar R; Drolet CE; Bs MA; Hanks T; Yamaguchi K; Krause K; Nemani VM; Leveque JC; Louie PK
    Eur Spine J; 2024 Sep; 33(9):3503-3508. PubMed ID: 38965087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Early Compensatory Segmental Angle Changes at L3-L4 and L4-L5 After a L5-S1 Interbody Fusion for a Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis.
    O'Connor B; Bansal A; Leveque JC; Drolet CE; Shen J; Nemani V; Canlas G; Louie PK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2024 Jun; 49(12):865-872. PubMed ID: 37798836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of interbody approach and lumbar level on segmental, adjacent, and sagittal alignment in degenerative lumbar pathology: a radiographic analysis six months following surgery.
    O'Connor B; Drolet CE; Leveque JA; Nemani V; Krause KL; Dorsi M; Schroerlucke S; Shen J; Louie PK
    Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1318-1324. PubMed ID: 35351666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis of L4-L5.
    Jang HD; Lee JC; Seo JH; Roh YH; Choi SW; Shin BJ
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Feb; 158():e10-e18. PubMed ID: 34637941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sagittal reconstruction of lumbosacral contiguous double-level spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: a comparison of double-level and single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Du CZ; Li S; Xu L; Zhou QS; Zhu ZZ; Sun X; Qiu Y
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 May; 14(1):148. PubMed ID: 31122245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Segmental Lordosis and Global Spinopelvic Alignment After Single-Level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Saadeh YS; Joseph JR; Smith BW; Kirsch MJ; Sabbagh AM; Park P
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 126():e1374-e1378. PubMed ID: 30902780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of modern-era anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction.
    Farber SH; Dugan RK; White MD; Walker CT; O'Neill LK; Alan N; Zhou JJ; Turner JD; Tumialán LM; Uribe JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Dec; 39(6):785-792. PubMed ID: 37548527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is the fate of the adjacent segmental angles 6 months after single-level L3-4 or L4-5 lateral lumbar interbody fusion?
    Verst L; Drolet CE; Shen J; Leveque JA; Nemani VM; Varley ES; Louie PK
    Spine J; 2023 Jul; 23(7):982-989. PubMed ID: 36893919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative analysis of the effects of OLIF and TLIF on adjacent segments after treatment of L4 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Li GQ; Tong T; Wang LF
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Apr; 17(1):203. PubMed ID: 35379259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do intraoperative radiographs predict final lumbar sagittal alignment following single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Salem KMI; Eranki AP; Paquette S; Boyd M; Street J; Kwon BK; Fisher CG; Dvorak MF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 May; 28(5):486-491. PubMed ID: 29451437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reciprocal Changes in Sagittal Spinal Alignment After L5-S1 Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Zhou JJ; Farber SH; Alan N; Furey CG; O'Neill LK; Giraldo JP; Mirzadeh Z; Turner JD; Uribe JS
    World Neurosurg; 2024 Aug; 188():e64-e70. PubMed ID: 38754550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.
    Ahlquist S; Park HY; Gatto J; Shamie AN; Park DY
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29631061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multicenter assessment of outcomes and complications associated with transforaminal versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion for fractional curve correction.
    Buell TJ; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Kim HJ; Klineberg EO; Lafage V; Lafage R; Protopsaltis TS; Passias PG; Mundis GM; Eastlack RK; Deviren V; Kelly MP; Daniels AH; Gum JL; Soroceanu A; Hamilton DK; Gupta MC; Burton DC; Hostin RA; Kebaish KM; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Ames CP; Smith JS;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Dec; 35(6):729-742. PubMed ID: 34416723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Restoring L4-S1 Lordosis Shape in Severe Sagittal Deformity: Impact of Correction Techniques on Alignment and Complication Profile.
    Singh M; Balmaceno-Criss M; Daher M; Lafage R; Hamilton DK; Smith JS; Eastlack RK; Fessler RG; Gum JL; Gupta MC; Hostin R; Kebaish KM; Klineberg EO; Lewis SJ; Line BG; Nunley PD; Mundis GM; Passias PG; Protopsaltis TS; Buell T; Ames CP; Mullin JP; Soroceanu A; Scheer JK; Lenke LG; Bess S; Shaffrey CI; Schwab FJ; Lafage V; Burton DC; Diebo BG; Daniels AH;
    World Neurosurg; 2024 Sep; 189():e219-e229. PubMed ID: 38866236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correction of severe spinopelvic mismatch: decreased blood loss with lateral hyperlordotic interbody grafts as compared with pedicle subtraction osteotomy.
    Leveque JC; Yanamadala V; Buchlak QD; Sethi RK
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E15. PubMed ID: 28760028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
    Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Circumferential fusion: a comparative analysis between anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis.
    Tye EY; Tanenbaum JE; Alonso AS; Xiao R; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Savage JW
    Spine J; 2018 Mar; 18(3):464-471. PubMed ID: 28821444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Posterior surgery in high-grade spondylolisthesis.
    Lengert R; Charles YP; Walter A; Schuller S; Godet J; Steib JP
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 Sep; 100(5):481-4. PubMed ID: 25002197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.