These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Accuracy of flapless surgery using an autonomous robotic system in full-arch immediate implant restoration: A case series. Shu Q; Chen D; Wang X; Liu Q; Ge Y; Su Y J Dent; 2024 Jun; 145():105017. PubMed ID: 38657725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of haptic robotic guidance of dental implant surgery for completely edentulous arches. Bolding SL; Reebye UN J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):639-647. PubMed ID: 33678441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic and static computer-assisted implant surgery for completely edentulous patients. A proof of a concept. Pomares-Puig C; Sánchez-Garcés MA; Jorba-García A J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104443. PubMed ID: 36720424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complete-arch fixed reconstruction by means of guided surgery and immediate loading: a retrospective clinical study on 12 patients with 1 year of follow-up. Lerner H; Hauschild U; Sader R; Ghanaati S BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jan; 20(1):15. PubMed ID: 31948414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice. Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic navigation guided surgery and prosthetics for immediate loading of complete-arch restoration. Pozzi A; Hansson L; Carosi P; Arcuri L J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Jan; 33(1):224-236. PubMed ID: 33470044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: An in vitro study. Ruiz-Romero V; Jorba-Garcia A; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E J Dent; 2024 Oct; 149():105290. PubMed ID: 39106900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect on the performance of a dynamic navigation system of superimposing a standard tessellation language (STL) file obtained with an intraoral scan on a cone beam computer tomograph (CBCT). An experimental in vitro study. Jorba-García A; Ruiz-Romero V; Bara-Casaus JJ; Camps-Font O; Sánchez-Garcés MÁ; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105150. PubMed ID: 38909646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy and safety of a haptic operated and machine vision controlled collaborative robot for dental implant placement: A translational study. Qiao SC; Wu XY; Shi JY; Tonetti MS; Lai HC Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Aug; 34(8):839-849. PubMed ID: 37309242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guides and the freehand approach in implant placement: a prospective clinical study. Younis H; Lv C; Xu B; Zhou H; Du L; Liao L; Zhao N; Long W; Elayah SA; Chang X; He L Head Face Med; 2024 May; 20(1):30. PubMed ID: 38745297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy and complications of computer-designed selective laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosthesis installation. Di Giacomo GA; da Silva JV; da Silva AM; Paschoal GH; Cury PR; Szarf G J Periodontol; 2012 Apr; 83(4):410-9. PubMed ID: 21819249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of the number and distribution of fiducial markers on the accuracy of robot-guided implant surgery in edentulous mandibular arches: An in vitro study. Zhao Y; Liao Y; Wu X; Zhang Y; Shi B; Yan Q J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104529. PubMed ID: 37105431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical accuracy of flapless computer-guided surgery for implant placement in edentulous arches. Vieira DM; Sotto-Maior BS; Barros CA; Reis ES; Francischone CE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1347-51. PubMed ID: 24066327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of immediate dental implant placement with task-autonomous robotic system and navigation system: An in vitro study. Chen J; Zhuang M; Tao B; Wu Y; Ye L; Wang F Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Aug; 35(8):973-983. PubMed ID: 37248610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of radiographic marker registration versus a markerless trace registration method on the implant placement accuracy achieved by dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery. An in-vitro study. Jorba-García A; Bara-Casaus JJ; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105072. PubMed ID: 38763387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Marchetti M; Scarfò B; Esposito M Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 25237668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of dynamic implant navigation surgery performed by a novice operator. Marques-Guasch J; Rodriguez-Bauzá R; Satorres-Nieto M; Hom-Lay W; Hernández-Alfaro F; Gargallo-Albiol J Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Nov; 25(4):377-385. PubMed ID: 35060374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]