These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38969915)
1. The Wrong of Eugenic Sterilization. Tarasenko-Struc A J Bioeth Inq; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38969915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. "Eugenics talk" and the language of bioethics. Wilkinson S J Med Ethics; 2008 Jun; 34(6):467-71. PubMed ID: 18511622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. When is the Promotion of Prenatal Testing for Selective Abortion Wrong? Perez Gomez J Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2020; 30(1):71-109. PubMed ID: 32336693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A resource-based version of the argument that cloning is an affront to human dignity. McDougall R J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):259-61. PubMed ID: 18375676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Against procreative moral rights. Earl J Bioethics; 2022 Jun; 36(5):569-575. PubMed ID: 34908181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eugenic sterilization: a discussion of certain legal, medical, and moral aspects of present practices in our public mental institutions. Birnbaum M JAMA; 1961 Mar; 175(11):951-8. PubMed ID: 12332119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Involuntary sterilization in the United States: a surgical solution. Reilly PR Q Rev Biol; 1987 Jun; 62(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 3299450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Challenging the bioethical application of the autonomy principle within multicultural societies. Fagan A J Appl Philos; 2004; 21(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 15148949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Medicine, eugenics, and the Supreme Court: from coercive sterilization to reproductive freedom. Lombardo PA J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 13(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 9068235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Human dignity in the Nazi era: implications for contemporary bioethics. O'MathĂșna DP BMC Med Ethics; 2006 Mar; 7():E2. PubMed ID: 16536874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The historical contingency of bioethics. Kevles DJ Princet J Bioeth; 2000; 3(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 11936137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions. Charo RA Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ["Well, it's not our fault that God made us so small". Opposition and self-will in women who suffered enforced sterilization]. Doetz S Med Ges Gesch; 2011; 30():111-27. PubMed ID: 22701953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eugenic sterilization and a qualified Nazi analogy: the United States and Germany, 1930-1945. Sofair AN; Kaldjian LC Ann Intern Med; 2000 Feb; 132(4):312-9. PubMed ID: 10681287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why We Should Defend Gene Editing as Eugenics. Agar N Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2019 Jan; 28(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 30570459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Legalised non-consensual sterilisation - eugenics put into practice before 1945, and the aftermath. Part 1: USA, Japan, Canada and Mexico. Amy JJ; Rowlands S Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2018 Apr; 23(2):121-129. PubMed ID: 29624082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [UNESCO's bioethical norms to avoid eugenic practices]. Cruz-Coke R Rev Med Chil; 2000 Jun; 128(6):679-82. PubMed ID: 11016069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Healing society: medical language in American eugenics. Kamrat-Lang D Sci Context; 1995; 8(1):175-96. PubMed ID: 11639653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]