These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38969915)

  • 21. Modern judicial treatment of procreative rights of developmentally disabled persons: equal rights to procreation and sterilization.
    Jaegers EM
    J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Fall; 31(4):947-79. PubMed ID: 11660196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Essay on the history of population policy in modern Japan. 2. Population policy on quality and quantity in National Eugenic Law (author's transl)].
    Hirosima K
    Jinko Mondai Kenkyu; 1981 Oct; (160):61-77. PubMed ID: 12155095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Eugenic sterilization: medico-legal and sociological aspects.
    Robinson FC; Robinson SW; Williams LJ
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1979 Jun; 71(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 480398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. ['Negative' eugenics, psychiatry, and Catholicism: clashes over eugenic sterilization in Brazil].
    Wegner R; Souza VS
    Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos; 2013 Mar; 20(1):263-88. PubMed ID: 23429742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Eugenic values.
    Wikler D
    Sci Context; 1998; 11(3-4):455-70. PubMed ID: 15168700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The economics of race and eugenic sterilization in North Carolina: 1958-1968.
    Price GN; Darity WA
    Econ Hum Biol; 2010 Jul; 8(2):261-72. PubMed ID: 20188639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mapping the human genome.
    Cook-Deegan RM
    South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):579-96. PubMed ID: 11645845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Undignified bioethics.
    Cochrane A
    Bioethics; 2010 Jun; 24(5):234-41. PubMed ID: 20002071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Blatant dehumanization in the mind's eye: Prevalent even among those who explicitly reject it?
    Petsko CD; Lei RF; Kunst JR; Bruneau E; Kteily N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Jun; 150(6):1115-1131. PubMed ID: 33119356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Leilani Muir versus the philosopher king: eugenics on trial in Alberta.
    Wahlsten D
    Genetica; 1997; 99(2-3):185-98. PubMed ID: 9463073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An ambiguity in Habermas's argument against liberal eugenics.
    Schäfer LP
    Bioethics; 2019 Nov; 33(9):1059-1064. PubMed ID: 31463995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How then should we die?: California's "Death with Dignity" Act.
    Evans RW
    Med Etika Bioet; 2000; 7(1-2):3-9. PubMed ID: 11933980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. People with cognitive disabilities: the Argument from Marginal Cases and social work ethics.
    O'Brien GV
    Soc Work; 2003 Jul; 48(3):331-7. PubMed ID: 12899280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. California's Sterilization Survivors: An Estimate and Call for Redress.
    Stern AM; Novak NL; Lira N; O'Connor K; Harlow S; Kardia S
    Am J Public Health; 2017 Jan; 107(1):50-54. PubMed ID: 27854540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Response to Erich Loewy: commentary.
    Thomasma DC
    J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(2):90-1. PubMed ID: 11642928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing.
    Marquis D
    J Med Ethics; 2001 Dec; 27(6):363-9. PubMed ID: 11731597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intertemporal Disagreement and Empirical Slippery Slope Arguments.
    Douglas T
    Utilitas; 2010 Jun; 22(2):184-197. PubMed ID: 21516214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The executioner's shadow: Coerced sterilization and the creation of "Latin" eugenics in Chile.
    Walsh S
    Hist Sci; 2022 Mar; 60(1):18-40. PubMed ID: 29644879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Re M. (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation) [1 December 1987].
    United Kingdom. High Court
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():22. PubMed ID: 12344341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Wrongs, preferences, and the selection of children: a critique of Rebecca Bennett's argument against the principle of procreative beneficence.
    Herissone-Kelly P
    Bioethics; 2012 Oct; 26(8):447-54. PubMed ID: 21320140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.