These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38970301)

  • 1. Low-dose, standard, and high-resolution cone beam computed tomography for alveolar bone measurements related to implant planning: An ex vivo study in human specimens.
    Kaaber L; Matzen LH; Spin-Neto R; Schropp L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38970301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Jawbone measurements of edentulous sites related to implant planning using magnetic resonance imaging compared to cone beam computed tomography: An ex vivo study.
    Fuglsig JMCES; Schropp L; Hansen B; Wenzel A; Spin-Neto R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Feb; 35(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 37985190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alveolar bone measurements in magnetic resonance imaging compared with cone beam computed tomography: a pilot,
    Fuglsig JMCES; Hansen B; Schropp L; Nixdorf DR; Wenzel A; Spin-Neto R
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2023 Apr; 81(3):241-248. PubMed ID: 36112428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
    Lofthag-Hansen S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
    Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
    Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cone-beam CT for preoperative implant planning in the posterior mandible: visibility of anatomic landmarks.
    Lofthag-Hansen S; Gröndahl K; Ekestubbe A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):246-55. PubMed ID: 18783419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of Head Orientation in Linear Measurement for Implant Planning in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A; Tabari S; Yarmohammadi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Jul; 16(7):542-6. PubMed ID: 26329408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of linear measurement accuracy obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom VG).
    Moshfeghi M; Tavakoli MA; Hosseini ET; Hosseini AT; Hosseini IT
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2012 Dec; 9(Suppl 1):S57-62. PubMed ID: 23814563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An In Vivo and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Investigation of the Accuracy in Measuring Alveolar Bone Height and Detecting Dehiscence and Fenestration Defects.
    Peterson AG; Wang M; Gonzalez S; Covell DA; Katancik J; Sehgal HS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1296-1304. PubMed ID: 30427960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative Evaluation of a Lower-Dose CBCT Acquisition Protocol for Preoperative Implant Site Assessment in Dry Human Skulls: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
    Tadinada A; Proft B; Thacker S; Yadav S
    J Oral Implantol; 2023 Aug; 49(4):408-413. PubMed ID: 37706651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of mandibular posterior regional landmarks using cone-beam computed tomography in dental implant surgery.
    de Souza LA; Souza Picorelli Assis NM; Ribeiro RA; Pires Carvalho AC; Devito KL
    Ann Anat; 2016 May; 205():53-9. PubMed ID: 26851559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of scan mode (180°/360°) of the cone beam computed tomography for preoperative dental implant measurements.
    Neves FS; Vasconcelos TV; Campos PS; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e155-8. PubMed ID: 23231370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring peri-implant bone lesions using low-dose cone-beam computed tomography.
    Leisner LC; Tasaka A; Trebing CT; Hilgenfeld T; Kosinski MA; Kronsteiner D; Rammelsberg P; Schwindling FS
    J Prosthodont Res; 2022 Apr; 66(2):326-332. PubMed ID: 34305085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cone-beam computed tomography with ultra-low dose protocols for pre-implant radiographic assessment: An in vitro study.
    Liljeholm R; Kadesjö N; Benchimol D; Hellén-Halme K; Shi XQ
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(3):351-359. PubMed ID: 28944361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT.
    Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 28327698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feasibility of implant placement in healed mandibular molar sites: A retrospective cone beam computed tomography study.
    He J; Liu Y; Lin Z; Li Y; Li C; Zhou L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):904.e1-904.e10. PubMed ID: 38472073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning.
    Luangchana P; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Kiattavorncharoen S; Jirajariyavej B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: Accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles.
    Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Slagmolen P; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):411-424. PubMed ID: 27990508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Qualitative Assessment of Reliability of Cone-beam Computed Tomography in evaluating Bone Density at Posterior Mandibular Implant Site.
    Dahiya K; Kumar N; Bajaj P; Sharma A; Sikka R; Dahiya S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Apr; 19(4):426-430. PubMed ID: 29728548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.