These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38970579)

  • 1. Contemporary Trends and Outcomes of Intravascular Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From BMC2.
    Sukul D; Seth M; Madder RD; Basir MB; Menees DS; Kaki A; Azzalini L; Lee D; Gurm HS
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Aug; 17(15):1811-1821. PubMed ID: 38970579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intravascular lithotripsy compared to rotational atherectomy for the treatment of calcified distal left main coronary artery disease: A single center experience.
    Sandesara PB; Elhage Hassan M; Shekiladze N; Turk AA; Montrivade S; Gold D; Kindya B; Rinfret S; Nicholson WJ; Jaber WA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Nov; 102(6):997-1003. PubMed ID: 37890004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complementary Utility of Intravascular Lithotripsy With Atherectomy for Severely Calcified Coronary Stenoses in Contemporary Practice.
    Takahashi T; Menegus M; Choi H; Bliagos D; Assafin M; Rauch J; Johnson M; Greenberg M; Khaliq A; Scotti A; Latib A
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2023 Jan; 35(1):E46-E54. PubMed ID: 36495542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of intravascular lithotripsy versus rotational atherectomy for the treatment of severe coronary artery calcification.
    Zhao Y; Wang P; Zheng Z; Shi Y; Liu J
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2024 Jun; 24(1):311. PubMed ID: 38898393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trends in Usage and Clinical Outcomes of Coronary Atherectomy: A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry.
    Beohar N; Kaltenbach LA; Wojdyla D; Pineda AM; Rao SV; Stone GW; Leon MB; Sanghvi KA; Moses JW; Kirtane AJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Feb; 13(2):e008239. PubMed ID: 31973557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined Coronary Orbital Atherectomy and Intravascular Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Stenoses: The First Case Series.
    Yarusi BB; Jagadeesan VS; Hussain S; Jivan A; Tesch A; Flaherty JD; Schimmel DR; Benzuly KH
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Mar; 34(3):E210-E217. PubMed ID: 35192504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coronary intravascular lithotripsy in contemporary practice: challenges and opportunities in coronary intervention.
    Gupta A; Shrivastava A; Dugal JS; Chhikara S; Vijayvergiya R; Singh N; Mehta AC; Mahesh NK; Swamy A
    Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis; 2024; 18():17539447241263444. PubMed ID: 39049591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Synergistic Coronary Artery Calcium Modification With Combined Atherectomy and Intravascular Lithotripsy.
    Wong B; Kam KK; So CY; Tam GM; Chi WK; Chui KL; Wu EB; Chan JY; Yan BP
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2023 Mar; 35(3):E128-E135. PubMed ID: 36645333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy for Calcified Coronary Lesions: First Real-World Experience.
    Wong B; El-Jack S; Newcombe R; Glenie T; Armstrong G; Khan A
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Mar; 31(3):46-48. PubMed ID: 30765621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physiological and angiographic outcomes of PCI in calcified lesions after rotational atherectomy or intravascular lithotripsy.
    Gallinoro E; Monizzi G; Sonck J; Candreva A; Mileva N; Nagumo S; Munhoz D; Buytaert D; Mastrangelo A; Andreini D; Galli S; Bartorelli AL; Barbato E; De Bruyne B; Collet C
    Int J Cardiol; 2022 Apr; 352():27-32. PubMed ID: 35120947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ShOckwave ballooN or Atherectomy with Rotablation in calcified coronary artery lesions: Design and rationale of the SONAR trial.
    Bennett J; McCutcheon K; Ameloot K; Vanhaverbeke M; Lesizza P; Castaldi G; Adriaenssens T; Minten L; Palmers PJ; de Hemptinne Q; de Wilde W; Ungureanu C; Vandeloo B; Colletti G; Coussement P; Van Mieghem NM; Dens J
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2024 Mar; 60():82-86. PubMed ID: 37714726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study of shockwave intravascular lithotripsy and conventional percutaneous coronary intervention in the treatment of severe coronary artery calcification lesions.
    Zou GX; Zhang GW; Wang ZD; Li P; Xie WC; Chen J
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2024 Jul; 19(1):434. PubMed ID: 38987849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety, efficacy, and optical coherence tomography insights into intravascular lithotripsy for the modification of non-eruptive calcified nodules: A prospective observational study.
    Gupta A; Shrivastava A; Chhikara S; Revaiah PC; Mamas MA; Vijayvergiya R; Seth A; Singh B; Bajaj N; Singh N; Dugal JS; Mahesh NK
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Oct; 104(4):688-696. PubMed ID: 39224005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of intravascular lithotripsy and rotational atherectomy for the treatment of heavily calcified coronary lesions: the STIFF ( S tenoses with calcificaTIon treated with angioplasty e FF ected with dedicated interventional tools) study.
    Garzon S; Bezerra F; Mariani J; Bandeira W; Prado G; Rueda V; Almeida B; Lemos P
    Coron Artery Dis; 2024 Sep; 35(6):445-450. PubMed ID: 38411184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in coronary stenosis with severe calcification: A multicenter systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sagris M; Ktenopoulos N; Dimitriadis K; Papanikolaou A; Tzoumas A; Terentes-Printzios D; Synetos A; Soulaidopoulos S; Lichtenberg M; Korosoglou G; Honton B; Tousoulis D; Tsioufis C; Toutouzas K
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Apr; 103(5):710-721. PubMed ID: 38482928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current applications, procedural and 1-year outcomes of Rotatripsy for the treatment of calcified coronary lesions.
    van Oort MJH; Al Amri I; Bingen BO; Oliveri F; Vilalta V; Jurado-Roman A; Pereira AR; Cordoba-Soriano JG; Rumiz González E; Fernández-Peregrina E; van der Kley F; Jukema JW; Montero-Cabezas JM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Aug; 104(2):203-212. PubMed ID: 38932584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feasibility of intravascular lithotripsy for calcific coronary lesions: A multi-institutional experience.
    Iwańczyk S; Włodarczak A; Hiczkiewicz J; Faron W; Grygier M; Furtan Ł; Łanocha M; Jastrzębski A; Siniawski A; Lesiak M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Oct; 98(4):E540-E547. PubMed ID: 34051136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trends in Utilization, and Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Orbital and Rotational Atherectomy.
    Aggarwal D; Seth M; Perdoncin E; Schreiber T; Kaki A; Alaswad K; Menees D; Sukul D; Gurm HS
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jan; 13(1):146-148. PubMed ID: 31918938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intravascular lithotripsy in calcified-coronary lesions: A real-world observational, European multicenter study.
    Aziz A; Bhatia G; Pitt M; Choudhury A; Hailan A; Upadhyaya S; Lee L; Testa L; Casenghi M; Ielasi A; Cortese B; Rides H; Basavarajaiah S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Aug; 98(2):225-235. PubMed ID: 32936532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of costs and resource utilization of rotational atherectomy versus intravascular lithotripsy for percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Rishad S; McEntegart M; Ford TJ; DI Mario C; Fajadet J; Lindsay M; Watkins S; Eteiba H; Brogan R; Good R; Oldroyd KG
    Minerva Cardiol Angiol; 2022 Jun; 70(3):332-340. PubMed ID: 34761665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.