These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38970685)

  • 1. How to fight fake papers: a review on important information sources and steps towards solution of the problem.
    Wittau J; Seifert R
    Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38970685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metadata analysis of retracted fake papers in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology.
    Wittau J; Seifert R
    Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 2024 Jun; 397(6):3995-4011. PubMed ID: 37994948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of fake papers in the era of artificial intelligence.
    Dadkhah M; Oermann MH; Hegedüs M; Raman R; Dávid LD
    Diagnosis (Berl); 2023 Nov; 10(4):390-397. PubMed ID: 37587910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fake paper identification in the pool of withdrawn and rejected manuscripts submitted to Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology.
    Wittau J; Celik S; Kacprowski T; Deserno TM; Seifert R
    Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 2024 Apr; 397(4):2171-2181. PubMed ID: 37796310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fake Journals: Their Features and Some Viable Ways to Distinguishing Them.
    Hemmat Esfe M; Wongwises S; Asadi A; Akbari M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Aug; 21(4):821-4. PubMed ID: 25230907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Threats to scholarly research integrity arising from paper mills: a rapid scoping review.
    Pérez-Neri I; Pineda C; Sandoval H
    Clin Rheumatol; 2022 Jul; 41(7):2241-2248. PubMed ID: 35524149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The raw truth about paper mills.
    Christopher J
    FEBS Lett; 2021 Jul; 595(13):1751-1757. PubMed ID: 34180058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.
    Nielsen MB; Seitz K
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The different models of scientific journals].
    Chippaux JP
    Med Trop Sante Int; 2023 Dec; 3(4):. PubMed ID: 38390021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Method for Improving the Integrity of Peer Review.
    Dadkhah M; Kahani M; Borchardt G
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1603-1610. PubMed ID: 28812275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology deals with fraudulent papers from paper mills.
    Seifert R
    Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 2021 Mar; 394(3):431-436. PubMed ID: 33547901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.
    Picardi N
    Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():1-3. PubMed ID: 28474609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Fake paper factories: root cause solutions are needed.].
    Caminiti C; De Fiore L
    Recenti Prog Med; 2023 Mar; 114(3):148-153. PubMed ID: 36815417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Valuable Research in Fake Journals and Self-boasting with Fake Metrics.
    Samuel AJ; Aranha VP
    J Pediatr Neurosci; 2018; 13(4):517-518. PubMed ID: 30937105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The story of fake impact factor companies and how we detected them.
    Jalalian M
    Electron Physician; 2015; 7(2):1069-72. PubMed ID: 26120416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fake/Bogus Conferences: Their Features and Some Subtle Ways to Differentiate Them from Real Ones.
    Asadi A; Rahbar N; Rezvani MJ; Asadi F
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):779-784. PubMed ID: 28397173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Plagiarism, Fake Peer-Review, and Duplication: Predominant Reasons Underlying Retractions of Iran-Affiliated Scientific Papers.
    Kamali N; Talebi Bezmin Abadi A; Rahimi F
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Dec; 26(6):3455-3463. PubMed ID: 33146787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21
    Byrne JA; Christopher J
    FEBS Lett; 2020 Feb; 594(4):583-589. PubMed ID: 32067229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How can emergency physicians protect their work in the era of pseudo publishing?
    Pamukcu Gunaydin G; Dogan NO
    Turk J Emerg Med; 2018 Mar; 18(1):11-14. PubMed ID: 29942876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.