These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38971023)

  • 1. Generalization of food devaluation following food-specific go/no-go training.
    Moshon-Cohen TE; Bitan T; Weinbach N
    Eat Behav; 2024 Aug; 54():101902. PubMed ID: 38971023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus variability improves generalization following response inhibition training.
    Moshon-Cohen TE; Weinbach N; Bitan T
    Psychol Res; 2024 Apr; 88(3):786-802. PubMed ID: 38227074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do impulsive individuals benefit more from food go/no-go training? Testing the role of inhibition capacity in the no-go devaluation effect.
    Chen Z; Veling H; Dijksterhuis A; Holland RW
    Appetite; 2018 May; 124():99-110. PubMed ID: 28442335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Training response inhibition to reduce food consumption: Mechanisms, stimulus specificity and appropriate training protocols.
    Adams RC; Lawrence NS; Verbruggen F; Chambers CD
    Appetite; 2017 Feb; 109():11-23. PubMed ID: 27838443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of attention in explaining the no-go devaluation effect: Effects on appetitive food items.
    Quandt J; Holland RW; Chen Z; Veling H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1119-1133. PubMed ID: 31144856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When not responding to food changes food value: The role of timing.
    Liu H; Holland RW; Veling H
    Appetite; 2023 Aug; 187():106583. PubMed ID: 37121485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Explicit and Implicit Devaluation Effects of Food-Specific Response Inhibition Training.
    Tzavella L; Chambers CD
    J Cogn; 2023; 6(1):10. PubMed ID: 36721799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How does not responding to appetitive stimuli cause devaluation: Evaluative conditioning or response inhibition?
    Chen Z; Veling H; Dijksterhuis A; Holland RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Dec; 145(12):1687-1701. PubMed ID: 27736134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Giving pork the chop: Response inhibition training to reduce meat intake.
    Camp B; Lawrence NS
    Appetite; 2019 Oct; 141():104315. PubMed ID: 31176649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No evidence of calorie-related modulation of N2 in food-related Go/No-Go training: A preregistered ERP study.
    Aulbach MB; Harjunen VJ; Spapé M; Knittle K; Haukkala A; Ravaja N
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Apr; 57(4):e13518. PubMed ID: 31898816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanisms underlying food devaluation after response inhibition to food.
    Saad M; Bohon C; Weinbach N
    Appetite; 2024 Aug; 199():107387. PubMed ID: 38692510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does Go/No-Go training lead to food devaluation? Separating the effects of motor inhibition and response valence.
    Houben K
    Cogn Emot; 2023; 37(4):763-776. PubMed ID: 37144522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Food-Specific Inhibition Training for Food Devaluation: A Meta-Analysis.
    Yang Y; Qi L; Morys F; Wu Q; Chen H
    Nutrients; 2022 Mar; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 35405975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beating uncontrolled eating: Training inhibitory control to reduce food intake and food cue sensitivity.
    Oomen D; Grol M; Spronk D; Booth C; Fox E
    Appetite; 2018 Dec; 131():73-83. PubMed ID: 30213747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chocolate equals stop. Chocolate-specific inhibition training reduces chocolate intake and go associations with chocolate.
    Houben K; Jansen A
    Appetite; 2015 Apr; 87():318-23. PubMed ID: 25596041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Go/no-go for food: Attention bias and intention to eat unhealthy food.
    Love H; Bhullar N; Schutte NS
    Appetite; 2020 Jul; 150():104646. PubMed ID: 32145372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Training response inhibition to food is associated with weight loss and reduced energy intake.
    Lawrence NS; O'Sullivan J; Parslow D; Javaid M; Adams RC; Chambers CD; Kos K; Verbruggen F
    Appetite; 2015 Dec; 95():17-28. PubMed ID: 26122756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Food-specific response inhibition, dietary restraint and snack intake in lean and overweight/obese adults: a moderated-mediation model.
    Price M; Lee M; Higgs S
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2016 May; 40(5):877-82. PubMed ID: 26592733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do smokers devaluate smoking cues after go/no-go training?
    Scholten H; Granic I; Chen Z; Veling H; Luijten M
    Psychol Health; 2019 May; 34(5):609-625. PubMed ID: 30693789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Generalization to untrained conditions following training with identical stimuli.
    Roth DA; Appelbaum M; Milo C; Kishon-Rabin L
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2008; 19(3-4):223-36. PubMed ID: 19025033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.