These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38971142)

  • 1. How often do fingerprint examiners disagree in routine casework?
    O'Connor R; Chapman A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jul; 361():112139. PubMed ID: 38971142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining and expanding the friction ridge value decision.
    Eldridge H; DeDonno M; Furrer J; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Sep; 314():110408. PubMed ID: 32731198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors associated with latent fingerprint exclusion determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():65-75. PubMed ID: 28324769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis.
    Pena MM; Stoiloff S; Sparacino M; Schreiber Compo N
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38922874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring what latent fingerprint examiners consider sufficient information for individualization determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110179. PubMed ID: 25372036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Will the introduction of an emotional context affect fingerprint analysis and decision-making?
    Hall LJ; Player E
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Oct; 181(1-3):36-9. PubMed ID: 18849126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why do latent fingerprint examiners differ in their conclusions?
    Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Ausdemore M; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Nov; 316():110542. PubMed ID: 33147525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A method for measuring the quality of friction skin impression evidence: Method development and validation.
    Swofford H; Champod C; Koertner A; Eldridge H; Salyards M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Mar; 320():110703. PubMed ID: 33524851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Utility of Expanded Conclusion Scales During Latent Print Examinations.
    Carter KE; Vogelsang MD; Vanderkolk J; Busey T
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1141-1154. PubMed ID: 32134513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resolving latent conflict: What happens when latent print examiners enter the cage?
    Rairden A; Garrett BL; Kelley S; Murrie D; Castillo A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():215-222. PubMed ID: 29933202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examiners.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32800. PubMed ID: 22427888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discrepancies in expert decision-making in forensic fingerprint examination.
    Mustonen V; Hakkarainen K; Tuunainen J; Pohjola P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Sep; 254():215-26. PubMed ID: 26254629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and reproducibility of forensic tire examination decisions.
    Richetelli N; LeMay J; Dunagan KM; Parks CL; Hicklin RA; Chapman WJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 May; 358():112009. PubMed ID: 38581823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding the sufficiency of information for latent fingerprint value determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Kiebuzinski GI; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jul; 230(1-3):99-106. PubMed ID: 23394968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utilizing AFIS searching tools to reduce errors in fingerprint casework.
    Langenburg G; Hall C; Rosemarie Q
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():123-133. PubMed ID: 26295930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of ordinal outcomes in forensic black-box studies.
    Arora HM; Kaplan-Damary N; Stern HS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jan; 354():111909. PubMed ID: 38104395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental results of fingerprint comparison validity and reliability: A review and critical analysis.
    Haber RN; Haber L
    Sci Justice; 2014 Sep; 54(5):375-389. PubMed ID: 25278202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Next Generation Identification system: Latent print matching algorithm and casework practices.
    Tom KR; Knorr KB; Davis CE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Mar; 332():111180. PubMed ID: 35063814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Superior outcomes following cervical fusion vs. multimodal rehabilitation in a subgroup of randomized Whiplash-Associated-Disorders (WAD) patients indicating somatic pain origin-Comparison of outcome assessments made by four examiners from different disciplines.
    Svensson E; Nyström B; Goldie I; Landrø NI; Sidén Å; Staff P; Schillberg B; Taube A
    Scand J Pain; 2018 Apr; 18(2):175-186. PubMed ID: 29794310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.