These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38971198)

  • 1. Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based Machine Learning Model Compared to Clinical Risk Scores for Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Shung DL; Chan CE; You K; Nakamura S; Saarinen T; Zheng NS; Simonov M; Li DK; Tsay C; Kawamura Y; Shen M; Hsiao A; Sekhon J; Laine L
    Gastroenterology; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38971198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of a Machine Learning Model That Outperforms Clinical Risk Scoring Systems for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Shung DL; Au B; Taylor RA; Tay JK; Laursen SB; Stanley AJ; Dalton HR; Ngu J; Schultz M; Laine L
    Gastroenterology; 2020 Jan; 158(1):160-167. PubMed ID: 31562847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An External Validation Study of the Oakland and Glasgow-Blatchford Scores for Predicting Adverse Outcomes of Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in an Asian Population.
    Quach DT; Vo UP; Nguyen NT; Le LT; Vo MH; Ho PT; Nguyen TN; Bo PK; Nguyen NH; Vu KT; Van Dang M; Dinh MC; Nguyen TQ; Van Nguyen X; Le ST; Tran CP
    Gastroenterol Res Pract; 2021; 2021():8674367. PubMed ID: 33505461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review.
    Shung D; Simonov M; Gentry M; Au B; Laine L
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Aug; 64(8):2078-2087. PubMed ID: 31055722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. External validation of the Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score and the Rockall Score in the US setting.
    Chandra S; Hess EP; Agarwal D; Nestler DM; Montori VM; Song LM; Wells GA; Stiell IG
    Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Jun; 30(5):673-9. PubMed ID: 21641145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective multicenter validation of the Glasgow Blatchford bleeding score in the management of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage presenting at an emergency department.
    Aquarius M; Smeets FG; Konijn HW; Stassen PM; Keulen ET; Van Deursen CT; Masclee AA; Keulemans YC
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Sep; 27(9):1011-6. PubMed ID: 26049709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development, Validation, and Comparative Assessment of an International Scoring System to Determine Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Oakland K; Kahan BC; Guizzetti L; Martel M; Bryant RV; Brahmania M; Singh S; Nguyen NQ; Sey MSL; Barkun A; Jairath V
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 May; 17(6):1121-1129.e2. PubMed ID: 30268566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Effectiveness of Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Gastrointestinal Bleeds in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Treatment.
    Herrin J; Abraham NS; Yao X; Noseworthy PA; Inselman J; Shah ND; Ngufor C
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 May; 4(5):e2110703. PubMed ID: 34019087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A modified Glasgow Blatchford Score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems.
    Cheng DW; Lu YW; Teller T; Sekhon HK; Wu BU
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Oct; 36(8):782-9. PubMed ID: 22928529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. External Validation of the Oakland Score to Assess Safe Hospital Discharge Among Adult Patients With Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the US.
    Oakland K; Kothiwale S; Forehand T; Jackson E; Bucknall C; Sey MSL; Singh S; Jairath V; Perlin J
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jul; 3(7):e209630. PubMed ID: 32633766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
    Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. External validation and comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford score, modified Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score and AIMS65 score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a cross-sectional observational study in Western Switzerland.
    Rivieri S; Carron PN; Schoepfer A; Ageron FX
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2023 Feb; 30(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 36542335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
    Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early identification of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding using natural language processing and decision rules.
    Shung D; Tsay C; Laine L; Chang D; Li F; Thomas P; Partridge C; Simonov M; Hsiao A; Tay JK; Taylor A
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Jun; 36(6):1590-1597. PubMed ID: 33105045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. External validation of Glasgow-Blatchford, modified Glasgow-Blatchford and CANUKA scores to identify low-risk patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study.
    Pognonec C; Dirhoussi Z; Cury N; Moreau M; Billard C; Yordanov Y; Thiebaud PC
    Emerg Med J; 2023 Jun; 40(6):451-457. PubMed ID: 37185303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of scoring systems for predicting clinical outcomes of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
    Prasitvarakul K; Attanath N; Chang A
    World J Surg; 2024 Feb; 48(2):474-483. PubMed ID: 38686770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safe discharge of patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB): can the use of Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score be extended?
    Le Jeune IR; Gordon AL; Farrugia D; Manwani R; Guha IN; James MW
    Acute Med; 2011; 10(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 22111089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is the Glasgow Blatchford score useful in the risk assessment of patients presenting with variceal haemorrhage?
    Reed EA; Dalton H; Blatchford O; Ashley D; Mowat C; Gaya DR; Cahill A; Warshow U; Hare N; Groome M; Forrest EH; Morris J; Stanley AJ
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 26(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 24535596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
    Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
    BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.