These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38971482)

  • 21. Action-sound coincidences suppress evoked responses of the human auditory cortex in EEG and MEG.
    Horváth J; Maess B; Baess P; Tóth A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Sep; 24(9):1919-31. PubMed ID: 22360594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sensory attenuation of self-initiated sounds maps onto habitual associations between motor action and sound.
    Mifsud NG; Whitford TJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Aug; 103():38-43. PubMed ID: 28720523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Action-related auditory ERP attenuation is not modulated by action effect relevance.
    Neszmélyi B; Horváth J
    Biol Psychol; 2021 Apr; 161():108029. PubMed ID: 33556451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The modulation of auditory novelty processing by working memory load in school age children and adults: a combined behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Ruhnau P; Wetzel N; Widmann A; Schröger E
    BMC Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 11():126. PubMed ID: 20929535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Action-related auditory ERP attenuation: Paradigms and hypotheses.
    Horváth J
    Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 1626():54-65. PubMed ID: 25843932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Varying effect of noise on sound onset and acoustic change evoked auditory cortical N1 responses evoked by a vowel-vowel stimulus.
    Yaralı M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jun; 152():36-43. PubMed ID: 32302643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Differences in evoked potentials during the active processing of sound location and motion.
    Richter N; Schröger E; Rübsamen R
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1204-14. PubMed ID: 23499852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Event-related brain potentials to self-triggered tones: Impact of action type and impulsivity traits.
    Le Bars S; Darriba Á; Waszak F
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Mar; 125():14-22. PubMed ID: 30685504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of inter-stimulus interval (ISI) duration on the N1 and P2 components of the auditory event-related potential.
    Pereira DR; Cardoso S; Ferreira-Santos F; Fernandes C; Cunha-Reis C; Paiva TO; Almeida PR; Silveira C; Barbosa F; Marques-Teixeira J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Dec; 94(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 25304172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The auditory P2 differentiates self- from partner-produced sounds during joint action: Contributions of self-specific attenuation and temporal orienting of attention.
    Bolt NK; Loehr JD
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Apr; 182():108526. PubMed ID: 36870472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Auditory N1 and P2 attenuation in action observation: An event-related potential study considering effects of temporal predictability and individualism.
    Egan S; Ghio M; Bellebaum C
    Biol Psychol; 2023 May; 180():108575. PubMed ID: 37156324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sensory attenuation of self-produced signals does not rely on self-specific motor predictions.
    Kaiser J; Schütz-Bosbach S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 47(11):1303-1310. PubMed ID: 29738617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do actions structure auditory memory? Action-based event segmentation effects on sensory responses, pupil dilation and sequential memory.
    Font-Alaminos M; Paraskevoudi N; Costa-Faidella J; SanMiguel I
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Nov; 61(11):e14652. PubMed ID: 38992865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electrophysiological alterations in motor-auditory predictive coding in autism spectrum disorder.
    van Laarhoven T; Stekelenburg JJ; Eussen MLJM; Vroomen J
    Autism Res; 2019 Apr; 12(4):589-599. PubMed ID: 30801964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sensory attenuation is modulated by the contrasting effects of predictability and control.
    Harrison AW; Mannion DJ; Jack BN; Griffiths O; Hughes G; Whitford TJ
    Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 237():118103. PubMed ID: 33957233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Self-initiation and temporal cueing of monaural tones reduce the auditory N1 and P2.
    Sowman PF; Kuusik A; Johnson BW
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):149-57. PubMed ID: 22885999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fifty Percent of the Time, Tones Come Every Time: Stronger Prediction Error Effects on Neurophysiological Sensory Attenuation for Self-generated Tones.
    Egan S; Seidel A; Weber C; Ghio M; Bellebaum C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 Oct; 36(10):2067-2083. PubMed ID: 39023362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Illusion of control affects ERP amplitude reductions for auditory outcomes of self-generated actions.
    Seidel A; Ghio M; Studer B; Bellebaum C
    Psychophysiology; 2021 May; 58(5):e13792. PubMed ID: 33604896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. ERP correlates of processing the auditory consequences of own versus observed actions.
    Ghio M; Scharmach K; Bellebaum C
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jun; 55(6):e13048. PubMed ID: 29266338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predictive coding of visual-auditory and motor-auditory events: An electrophysiological study.
    Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J
    Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 1626():88-96. PubMed ID: 25641042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.