These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38971789)

  • 1. Human navigation strategies and their errors result from dynamic interactions of spatial uncertainties.
    Kessler F; Frankenstein J; Rothkopf CA
    Nat Commun; 2024 Jul; 15(1):5677. PubMed ID: 38971789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Environmental Anchoring of Head Direction in a Computational Model of Retrosplenial Cortex.
    Bicanski A; Burgess N
    J Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 36(46):11601-11618. PubMed ID: 27852770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal combination of environmental cues and path integration during navigation.
    Sjolund LA; Kelly JW; McNamara TP
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jan; 46(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 28828745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neurons including hippocampal spatial view cells, and navigation in primates including humans.
    Rolls ET
    Hippocampus; 2021 Jun; 31(6):593-611. PubMed ID: 33760309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does spatial cognitive style affect how navigational strategy is planned?
    Bocchi A; Palmiero M; Nori R; Verde P; Piccardi L
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Oct; 237(10):2523-2533. PubMed ID: 31332472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Representation of human spatial navigation responding to input spatial information and output navigational strategies: An ALE meta-analysis.
    Qiu Y; Wu Y; Liu R; Wang J; Huang H; Huang R
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2019 Aug; 103():60-72. PubMed ID: 31201830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanistic flexibility of the retrosplenial cortex enables its contribution to spatial cognition.
    Stacho M; Manahan-Vaughan D
    Trends Neurosci; 2022 Apr; 45(4):284-296. PubMed ID: 35183378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Olfactory landmarks and path integration converge to form a cognitive spatial map.
    Fischler-Ruiz W; Clark DG; Joshi NR; Devi-Chou V; Kitch L; Schnitzer M; Abbott LF; Axel R
    Neuron; 2021 Dec; 109(24):4036-4049.e5. PubMed ID: 34710366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Where did it come from, where do you go? Direction sources influence navigation decisions during spatial uncertainty.
    Brunyé TT; Gagnon SA; Gardony AL; Gopal N; Holmes A; Taylor HA; Tenbrink T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(3):585-607. PubMed ID: 25285995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A model for transforming egocentric views into goal-directed behavior.
    LaChance PA; Taube JS
    Hippocampus; 2023 May; 33(5):488-504. PubMed ID: 36780179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal features of spatial knowledge: Representing order and duration of topographical information.
    Teghil A; Boccia M; Bonavita A; Guariglia C
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 376():112218. PubMed ID: 31499091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social targets improve body-based and environment-based strategies during spatial navigation.
    Kuehn E; Chen X; Geise P; Oltmer J; Wolbers T
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Mar; 236(3):755-764. PubMed ID: 29327266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repetition Suppression Reveals Cue-Specific Spatial Representations for Landmarks and Self-Motion Cues in the Human Retrosplenial Cortex.
    Chen X; Wei Z; Wolbers T
    eNeuro; 2024 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 38519127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Restructuring the navigational field: individual predisposition towards field independence predicts preferred navigational strategy.
    Boccia M; Piccardi L; D'Alessandro A; Nori R; Guariglia C
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 235(6):1741-1748. PubMed ID: 28283695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of visual map complexity on the attentional processing of landmarks.
    Keil J; Edler D; Kuchinke L; Dickmann F
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229575. PubMed ID: 32119712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age-related preference for geometric spatial cues during real-world navigation.
    Bécu M; Sheynikhovich D; Tatur G; Agathos CP; Bologna LL; Sahel JA; Arleo A
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Jan; 4(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 31548677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EEG correlates of spatial orientation in the human retrosplenial complex.
    Lin CT; Chiu TC; Gramann K
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():123-32. PubMed ID: 26163801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Where am I and how will I get there from here? A role for posterior parietal cortex in the integration of spatial information and route planning.
    Calton JL; Taube JS
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2009 Feb; 91(2):186-96. PubMed ID: 18929674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Granger causal connectivity dissociates navigation networks that subserve allocentric and egocentric path integration.
    Lin CT; Chiu TC; Wang YK; Chuang CH; Gramann K
    Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 1679():91-100. PubMed ID: 29158177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impaired cerebellar Purkinje cell potentiation generates unstable spatial map orientation and inaccurate navigation.
    Lefort JM; Vincent J; Tallot L; Jarlier F; De Zeeuw CI; Rondi-Reig L; Rochefort C
    Nat Commun; 2019 May; 10(1):2251. PubMed ID: 31113954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.