These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3897334)

  • 1. Two-year clinical evaluation of light-cured composite resin restorations in primary molars.
    Tonn EM; Ryge G
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1985 Jul; 111(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 3897334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluations of composite resin restorations in primary molars: a 4-year follow-up study.
    Tonn EM; Ryge G
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1988 Oct; 117(5):603-6. PubMed ID: 3225375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Composite restorations for primary molars: results after four years.
    Oldenburg TR; Vann WF; Dilley DC
    Pediatr Dent; 1987 Jun; 9(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 3475683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin.
    Barnes DM; Blank LW; Thompson VP; Holston AM; Gingell JC
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Feb; 22(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 2068249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing composite resin wear in primary molars: four-year findings.
    Vann WF; Barkmeier WW; Mahler DB
    J Dent Res; 1988 May; 67(5):876-9. PubMed ID: 2966821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
    Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical review of preventive resin restorations.
    Walker JD; Jensen ME; Pinkham JR
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(4):257-9. PubMed ID: 2197305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
    Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
    Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of composite resin tunnel restorations on primary molars.
    de Freitas AR; de Andrada MA; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; de Sousa CN
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jun; 25(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 7938431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.
    Rocha Gomes Torres C; Rêgo HM; Perote LC; Santos LF; Kamozaki MB; Gutierrez NC; Di Nicoló R; Borges AB
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 24769385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Saucer-shaped cavity preparation for composite resin restorations in class II carious lesions: three-year results.
    Nordbo H; Leirskar J; von der Fehr FR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Feb; 69(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 8429508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
    el-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
    Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tunnel restorations. A 3 1/2-year follow up study of Class I and II tunnel restorations in permanent and primary teeth.
    Hasselrot L
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(5):173-82. PubMed ID: 8291027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: observations up to 10 years.
    Nordbø H; Leirskar J; von der Fehr FR
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jan; 29(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 9611469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical performance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with resin-based materials. 24-month results.
    Cehreli ZC; Cetinguc A; Cengiz SB; Altay AN
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):262-6. PubMed ID: 17073200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite under different conditioning methods in primary teeth.
    Turgut MD; Tekçiçek M; Olmez S
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 15470873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth.
    Gianordoli Neto R; Santiago SL; Mendonça JS; Passos VF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):26-33. PubMed ID: 18473024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.