These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38973591)

  • 21. Dynamic treatment regimens in small n, sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials: An application in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.
    Chao YC; Trachtman H; Gipson DS; Spino C; Braun TM; Kidwell KM
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 May; 92():105989. PubMed ID: 32200006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identifying a set that contains the best dynamic treatment regimes.
    Ertefaie A; Wu T; Lynch KG; Nahum-Shani I
    Biostatistics; 2016 Jan; 17(1):135-48. PubMed ID: 26243172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparing dynamic treatment regimes using repeated-measures outcomes: modeling considerations in SMART studies.
    Lu X; Nahum-Shani I; Kasari C; Lynch KG; Oslin DW; Pelham WE; Fabiano G; Almirall D
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(10):1595-615. PubMed ID: 26638988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of research electronic data capture (REDCap) in a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): a practical example of automating double randomization.
    Lee CA; Gamino D; Lore M; Donelson C; Windsor LC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jul; 23(1):162. PubMed ID: 37415099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of research electronic data capture (REDCap) in a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): A practical example of automating double randomization.
    Lee CA; Gamino D; Lore M; Donelson C; Windsor LC
    Res Sq; 2023 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 36865151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sample size considerations for comparing dynamic treatment regimens in a sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial with a continuous longitudinal outcome.
    Seewald NJ; Kidwell KM; Nahum-Shani I; Wu T; McKay JR; Almirall D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1891-1912. PubMed ID: 31571526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Data Analysis Method for Using Longitudinal Binary Outcome Data from a SMART to Compare Adaptive Interventions.
    Dziak JJ; Yap JRT; Almirall D; McKay JR; Lynch KG; Nahum-Shani I
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(5):613-636. PubMed ID: 30663401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) in oncology: systematic review of published studies.
    Lorenzoni G; Petracci E; Scarpi E; Baldi I; Gregori D; Nanni O
    Br J Cancer; 2023 Mar; 128(7):1177-1188. PubMed ID: 36572731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. SMART designs in cancer research: Past, present, and future.
    Kidwell KM
    Clin Trials; 2014 Aug; 11(4):445-456. PubMed ID: 24733671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. SMART Binary: New Sample Size Planning Resources for SMART Studies with Binary Outcome Measurements.
    Dziak JJ; Almirall D; Dempsey W; Stanger C; Nahum-Shani I
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 37459401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Design and analysis considerations for utilizing a mapping function in a small sample, sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials with continuous outcomes.
    Hartman H; Tamura RN; Schipper MJ; Kidwell KM
    Stat Med; 2021 Jan; 40(2):312-326. PubMed ID: 33111381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A small n sequential multiple assignment randomized trial design for use in rare disease research.
    Tamura RN; Krischer JP; Pagnoux C; Micheletti R; Grayson PC; Chen YF; Merkel PA
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2016 Jan; 46():48-51. PubMed ID: 26586608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Joint modeling and multiple comparisons with the best of data from a SMART with survival outcomes.
    Chao YC; Tran Q; Tsodikov A; Kidwell KM
    Biostatistics; 2022 Jan; 23(1):294-313. PubMed ID: 32659784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A scoping review of studies using observational data to optimise dynamic treatment regimens.
    Mahar RK; McGuinness MB; Chakraborty B; Carlin JB; IJzerman MJ; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):39. PubMed ID: 33618655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A group sequential, response-adaptive design for randomized clinical trials.
    Karrison TG; Huo D; Chappell R
    Control Clin Trials; 2003 Oct; 24(5):506-22. PubMed ID: 14500050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Noninferiority and equivalence tests in sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials (SMARTs).
    Ghosh P; Nahum-Shani I; Spring B; Chakraborty B
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):182-205. PubMed ID: 31497981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Q-learning: a data analysis method for constructing adaptive interventions.
    Nahum-Shani I; Qian M; Almirall D; Pelham WE; Gnagy B; Fabiano GA; Waxmonsky JG; Yu J; Murphy SA
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Dec; 17(4):478-94. PubMed ID: 23025434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. SMART longitudinal analysis: A tutorial for using repeated outcome measures from SMART studies to compare adaptive interventions.
    Nahum-Shani I; Almirall D; Yap JRT; McKay JR; Lynch KG; Freiheit EA; Dziak JJ
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Feb; 25(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 31318231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of adaptive treatment strategies based on longitudinal outcomes in sequential multiple assignment randomized trials.
    Li Z
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(3):403-415. PubMed ID: 27646957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Two-stage response adaptive randomization designs for multi-arm trials with binary outcome.
    Lu X; Shan G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):526-538. PubMed ID: 37452825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.