These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38974743)

  • 1. Item Analysis of Single Best Response Type Multiple Choice Questions for Formative Assessment in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
    Kulshreshtha S; Gupta G; Goyal G; Gupta K; Davda K
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2024 Jun; 74(3):256-264. PubMed ID: 38974743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Item and Test Analysis to Identify Quality Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) from an Assessment of Medical Students of Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
    Gajjar S; Sharma R; Kumar P; Rana M
    Indian J Community Med; 2014 Jan; 39(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 24696535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Multiple-Choice Questions by Item Analysis, from an Online Internal Assessment of 6
    Bhattacherjee S; Mukherjee A; Bhandari K; Rout AJ
    Indian J Community Med; 2022; 47(1):92-95. PubMed ID: 35368481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Writing Multiple Choice Questions-Has the Student Become the Master?
    Pham H; Court-Kowalski S; Chan H; Devitt P
    Teach Learn Med; 2023; 35(3):356-367. PubMed ID: 35491868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.
    Abdulghani HM; Irshad M; Haque S; Ahmad T; Sattar K; Khalil MS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185895. PubMed ID: 29016659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Item analysis of multiple choice questions: A quality assurance test for an assessment tool.
    Kumar D; Jaipurkar R; Shekhar A; Sikri G; Srinivas V
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2021 Feb; 77(Suppl 1):S85-S89. PubMed ID: 33612937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in the Surgery Course for an Integrated Curriculum, University of Bisha College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia.
    Al Ameer AY
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50441. PubMed ID: 38222171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Item analysis and optimizing multiple-choice questions for a viable question bank in ophthalmology: A cross-sectional study.
    Bhat SK; Prasad KHL
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 69(2):343-346. PubMed ID: 33463588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of clinical-scenario (case cluster) versus stand-alone multiple choice questions in a problem-based learning environment in undergraduate medicine.
    Vuma S; Sa B
    J Taibah Univ Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 12(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 31435208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Faculty development programs improve the quality of Multiple Choice Questions items' writing.
    Abdulghani HM; Ahmad F; Irshad M; Khalil MS; Al-Shaikh GK; Syed S; Aldrees AA; Alrowais N; Haque S
    Sci Rep; 2015 Apr; 5():9556. PubMed ID: 25828516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Item analysis: the impact of distractor efficiency on the difficulty index and discrimination power of multiple-choice items.
    Rezigalla AA; Eleragi AMESA; Elhussein AB; Alfaifi J; ALGhamdi MA; Al Ameer AY; Yahia AIO; Mohammed OA; Adam MIE
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 Apr; 24(1):445. PubMed ID: 38658912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonfunctional distractor analysis: An indicator for quality of Multiple choice questions.
    Sajjad M; Iltaf S; Khan RA
    Pak J Med Sci; 2020; 36(5):982-986. PubMed ID: 32704275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relations of the Number of Functioning Distractors With the Item Difficulty Index and the Item Discrimination Power in the Multiple Choice Questions.
    Chauhan GR; Chauhan BR; Vaza JV; Chauhan PR
    Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e42492. PubMed ID: 37644928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of a One-Day Workshop on the Quality of Framing Multiple Choice Questions in Physiology in a Medical College in India.
    Dhanvijay AKD; Dhokane N; Balgote S; Kumari A; Juhi A; Mondal H; Gupta P
    Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e44049. PubMed ID: 37746478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Climbing Bloom's taxonomy pyramid: Lessons from a graduate histology course.
    Zaidi NB; Hwang C; Scott S; Stallard S; Purkiss J; Hortsch M
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Sep; 10(5):456-464. PubMed ID: 28231408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Faculty Training on Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions.
    Gupta P; Meena P; Khan AM; Malhotra RK; Singh T
    Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2020; 10(3):210-214. PubMed ID: 33088746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An assessment of preclinical removable prosthodontics based on multiple-choice questions: Stakeholders' perceptions.
    Shammas M; Nagda S; Shah C; Baxi G; Gadde P; Sachdeva S; Gupta D; Wali O; Dhall RS; Gajdhar S
    J Dent Educ; 2024 May; 88(5):533-543. PubMed ID: 38314889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of one-best MCQs: the difficulty index, discrimination index and distractor efficiency.
    Hingorjo MR; Jaleel F
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2012 Feb; 62(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 22755376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Item analysis of in use multiple choice questions in pharmacology.
    Kaur M; Singla S; Mahajan R
    Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2016; 6(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 27563581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.