These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38977553)

  • 61. Assessing the environmental impacts of copper cathode production based on life cycle assessment.
    Shahraki H; Einollahipeer F; Abyar H; Erfani M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2024 Jul; 20(4):1180-1190. PubMed ID: 37888492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. An attributional life cycle assessment of microbial protein production: A case study on using hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria.
    Järviö N; Maljanen NL; Kobayashi Y; Ryynänen T; Tuomisto HL
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jul; 776():145764. PubMed ID: 33639472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Life cycle assessment of camelina oil derived biodiesel and jet fuel in the Canadian Prairies.
    Li X; Mupondwa E
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 481():17-26. PubMed ID: 24572928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. From beans to bar: A life cycle assessment towards sustainable chocolate supply chain.
    Recanati F; Marveggio D; Dotelli G
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Feb; 613-614():1013-1023. PubMed ID: 28946374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Modelling energy and environmental impacts of traditional and improved shea butter production in West Africa for food security.
    Naughton CC; Zhang Q; Mihelcic JR
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Jan; 576():284-291. PubMed ID: 27788443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Precision feeding as a tool to reduce the environmental footprint of pig production systems: a life-cycle assessment.
    Llorens B; Pomar C; Goyette B; Rajagopal R; Andretta I; Latorre MA; Remus A
    J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 39115251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Life cycle assessment of most widely adopted solar photovoltaic energy technologies by mid-point and end-point indicators of ReCiPe method.
    Rashedi A; Khanam T
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Aug; 27(23):29075-29090. PubMed ID: 32424748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Life cycle assessment of sheep cheese production in a small dairy factory from Romanian rural area.
    Ghinea C; Leahu A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(3):6986-7004. PubMed ID: 36018408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Assessing the environmental impact of gold production from double refractory ore in a large-scale facility.
    Kadivar S; Akbari H; Vahidi E
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 905():167841. PubMed ID: 37848149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Environmental impacts of a rice-beef-biogas integrated system in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam evaluated by life cycle assessment.
    Ogino A; Van Thu N; Hosen Y; Izumi T; Suzuki T; Sakai T; Ando S; Osada T; Kawashima T
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Sep; 294():112900. PubMed ID: 34111596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Assessing the environmental impacts of organic and conventional mixed vegetable production based on the life cycle assessment approach.
    Temizyurek-Arslan M; Karacetin E
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2022 Nov; 18(6):1733-1746. PubMed ID: 35332683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Eco-energy and environmental evaluation of cantaloupe production by life cycle assessment method.
    Azizpanah A; Fathi R; Taki M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(1):1854-1870. PubMed ID: 35922594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Energy analyses and greenhouse gas emissions assessment for saffron production cycle.
    Bakhtiari AA; Hematian A; Sharifi A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Oct; 22(20):16184-201. PubMed ID: 26070740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Life Cycle Assessment of Biofertilizer Production and Use Compared with Conventional Liquid Digestate Management.
    Styles D; Adams P; Thelin G; Vaneeckhaute C; Chadwick D; Withers PJA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Jul; 52(13):7468-7476. PubMed ID: 29847107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Life cycle environmental impacts of biogas production and utilisation substituting for grid electricity, natural gas grid and transport fuels.
    Natividad Pérez-Camacho M; Curry R; Cromie T
    Waste Manag; 2019 Jul; 95():90-101. PubMed ID: 31351658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Evaluation of the environmental performance of alternatives for polystyrene production in Brazil.
    Hansen AP; da Silva GA; Kulay L
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Nov; 532():655-68. PubMed ID: 26119380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Life cycle analysis of copper-gold-lead-silver-zinc beneficiation process.
    Farjana SH; Huda N; Mahmud MAP
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Apr; 659():41-52. PubMed ID: 30594860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Life cycle assessment of pasture-based dairy production systems: Current and future performance.
    Herron J; O'Brien D; Shalloo L
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jul; 105(7):5849-5869. PubMed ID: 35599025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Rice single cropping or ratooning agro-system: which one is more environment-friendly?
    Firouzi S; Nikkhah A; Aminpanah H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Nov; 25(32):32246-32256. PubMed ID: 30225691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Energy-economic-environmental cycle evaluation comparing two polyethylene and polycarbonate plastic greenhouses in cucumber production (from production to packaging and distribution).
    Hesampour R; Taki M; Fathi R; Hassani M; Halog A
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jul; 828():154232. PubMed ID: 35283131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.