These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3898221)
1. Digital subtraction angiography of the extremities using table translation. Foley WD; McDaniel D; Milde MW; Bell R Radiology; 1985 Oct; 157(1):255-8. PubMed ID: 3898221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Intravenous digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremities combined with step translation (2-field DSA)]. Fritschy P; Terrier F Rofo; 1988 Mar; 148(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 2832892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peripheral vascular disease: prospective study of intraarterial digital subtraction angiography using a 9-inch intensifier. Garvey CJ; Wilkins RA; Lewis JD Radiology; 1986 May; 159(2):423-7. PubMed ID: 3515419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital subtraction angiography for examination of vessels of the leg: use of a 40-cm image intensifier. Passariello R; Rossi P; Simonetti G; Tempesta P; Pavone P; Castrucci M; McBride K Radiology; 1983 Dec; 149(3):669-74. PubMed ID: 6359260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in diagnostic arteriography. Kaufman SL; Chang R; Kadir S; Mitchell SE; White RI Radiology; 1984 May; 151(2):323-7. PubMed ID: 6369390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography: a comparative view. Kaufman SL; Chang R; Kadir S; Mitchell SE; White RI Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1983; 6(4-6):271-9. PubMed ID: 6360368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Hellmich M; Nijenhuis M; Lackner K; Gossmann A Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Intravenous digital subtraction angiography (i.v. DSA) of the leg arteries using a movable table]. Harder T; Herter M; Lackner K Rofo; 1984 Jun; 140(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 6429786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Digital subtraction angiography and large-film angiography of the pelvic and leg arteries]. Harder T; Lackner K; Herter M; Leipner N Rofo; 1987 Apr; 146(4):438-46. PubMed ID: 3033769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital subtraction angiography versus standard contrast arteriography in evaluation of peripheral vascular disease. Skau T; Bolin T; Karner G Int Angiol; 1988; 7(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 3290359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital intraarterial subtraction technique of the extracerebral vascular system. Baert AL; Wilms GE; de Somer F; Smits J Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1983; 6(4-6):197-200. PubMed ID: 6360356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Digital subtraction angiography of the cerebral vessels by intraarterial injection]. Nagata I; Kikuchi H; Karasawa J; Mitsugi T; Naruo Y; Takamiya M No Shinkei Geka; 1984 Oct; 12(11):1273-8. PubMed ID: 6392918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Comparison between large-format angiography, digital subtraction angiography and intermediate-format technic]. Triller J; Jung H Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1988 Sep; 118(35):1248-51. PubMed ID: 3055269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Routine evaluation of arteriopathies of the lower extremities by digital subtraction angiography. Stacul F; Pozzi-Mucelli R; Predonzan F; Magnaldi S; Abbona M; Pozzi-Mucelli RS; Dalla Palma L Eur J Radiol; 1985 Nov; 5(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 3910432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography and conventional filming in peripheral vascular disease. Sniderman KW; Morse SS; Strauss EB Can Assoc Radiol J; 1986 Jun; 37(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 2941436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography of peripheral arteries with isotonic contrast material. Yashiro N; Itai Y; Ohtomo K; Furui S; Iio M Radiat Med; 1984; 2(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 6399584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities: standard-dose vs. high-dose gadodiamide injection. Krause U; Kroencke T; Spielhaupter E; Taupitz M; Kenn W; Hamm B; Hahn D J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 21(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 15778953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Time-resolved MR angiography of the calf arteries using a phased array cardiac coil: comparison of visibility with standard three-step bolus chase MR angiography. Eshed I; Rimon U; Novikov I; Goitein O; Konen E Acta Radiol; 2011 Nov; 52(9):973-7. PubMed ID: 21982849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonselective digital subtraction angiography. Compact contrast material bolus for improved image quality. Rees CR; Alvarado R; Palmaz JC; Reuter SR Invest Radiol; 1989 Apr; 24(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 2663762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Timing algorithm for bolus chase MR digital subtraction angiography. Wang Y; Lee HM; Avakian R; Winchester PA; Khilnani NM; Trost D Magn Reson Med; 1998 May; 39(5):691-6. PubMed ID: 9581598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]