These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38983164)

  • 21. Safety and Feasibility of a Lower-Cost Stapler in Bariatric Surgery.
    Roberts KE; Renee Hilton L; Friedman DT; Frieder JS; Zhang X; Duffy AJ
    Obes Surg; 2019 Feb; 29(2):401-405. PubMed ID: 30411224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. First experiences with the Radial Reload with Tri-staple™ technology in low rectal surgery.
    van Vugt JL; Tegels JJ; Derikx JP; Visschers RG; Stoot JH
    Int J Surg; 2015 Feb; 14():23-7. PubMed ID: 25576759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ex vivo pneumostasis evaluation of a variable-height staple design.
    Contini E; Godek ML; Whiffen JM; Bronson DG
    Innovations (Phila); 2013; 8(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 24145973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating the Environmental Impact of Single-Use and Multi-Use Surgical Staplers with Staple Line Buttressing in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery.
    Meissner M; Hafermann J; Silas U; Saunders R
    Risk Manag Healthc Policy; 2023; 16():1423-1433. PubMed ID: 37560134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Gripping Surface Technology Staple Reloads versus Standard Staple Reloads Used with Manual Linear Surgical Staplers.
    Fortin SP; Petraiuolo W; Cafri G; Scapini G; Agarwal P; Chakke D; Johnston S; Johnson BH; Coplan PM; Zhang S
    Med Devices (Auckl); 2022; 15():385-399. PubMed ID: 36545363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stapler Malfunctions in Bariatric Surgery: An Analysis of the MAUDE Database.
    Clapp B; Schrodt A; Ahmad M; Wicker E; Sharma N; Vivar A; Davis B
    JSLS; 2022; 26(1):. PubMed ID: 35281706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using a narrow-profile vascular stapler through an 8-mm robotic port.
    Shidei H; Mitsuboshi S; Akihiro K; Aoshima H; Isaka T; Kanzaki M
    J Surg Case Rep; 2021 Apr; 2021(4):rjab157. PubMed ID: 33927881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative Analysis of Hemostasis and Staple-Line Integrity between Medtronic Tri-Staple
    Hogan G; Rao R; Rao A; Talebi F
    JSLS; 2024; 28(2):. PubMed ID: 38910956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of the time interval between clamping and linear stapling for resection of porcine small intestine.
    Morita K; Maeda N; Kawaoka T; Hiraki S; Kudo A; Fukuda S; Oka M
    Surg Endosc; 2008 Mar; 22(3):750-6. PubMed ID: 17694412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improving Hemostasis in Sleeve Gastrectomy With Alternative Stapler.
    Redmann JG; Lavin TE; French MS; Broussard TD; Lapointe-Gagner M
    JSLS; 2020; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 33447003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Nekliudov NA; Tsarkov PV; Tulina IA
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e15978. PubMed ID: 31192938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Endovascular radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2011; 11(1):1-93. PubMed ID: 23074413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluating Performance of Circular Staplers Using Comparative Test Methods for Evidence-Based Surgery.
    Strassner H; Caulk A; Reher N; Petrescu S; Vasanji A
    Surg Innov; 2023 Oct; 30(5):576-585. PubMed ID: 37029908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robotic stapler use: Is it safe?-FDA database analysis across multiple surgical specialties.
    Giffen Z; Ezzone A; Ekwenna O
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253548. PubMed ID: 34166443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of a novel stapler performance for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
    Salyer C; Spuzzillo A; Wakefield D; Gomaa D; Thompson J; Goodman M
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):4016-4021. PubMed ID: 32749610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pitfalls related to the use of endostaplers during video-assisted thoracic surgery.
    Gossot D; Merlusca G; Tudor A; Boudaya MS; Radu C; Magdeleinat P
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Jan; 23(1):189-92. PubMed ID: 18322748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Advantages of using a robotic stapler in rectal cancer surgery.
    Tejedor P; Sagias F; Nock D; Flashman K; Naqvi S; Kandala NL; Khan JS
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Apr; 14(2):365-370. PubMed ID: 31290074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y reconstruction using conventional linear stapler in robotic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
    Ojima T; Nakamura M; Hayata K; Yamaue H
    Surg Oncol; 2020 Jun; 33():9-10. PubMed ID: 31885361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of Powered and Tissue-Specific Endoscopic Stapling Technology on Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy Procedures: A Retrospective, Observational Study.
    Miller DL; Roy S; Kassis ES; Yadalam S; Ramisetti S; Johnston SS
    Adv Ther; 2018 May; 35(5):707-723. PubMed ID: 29663180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Manipulation of long-shaft stapler in robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lung resection.
    Mitsuboshi S; Ogihara A; Katagiri S; Maeda H; Aoshima H; Matsumoto T; Isaka T; Kanzaki M
    J Surg Case Rep; 2020 Jun; 2020(6):rjaa110. PubMed ID: 32577205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.