BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3898441)

  • 1. A new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture made from polytrimethylene carbonate.
    Katz AR; Mukherjee DP; Kaganov AL; Gordon S
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1985 Sep; 161(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 3898441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polydioxanone (PDS), a novel monofilament synthetic absorbable suture.
    Ray JA; Doddi N; Regula D; Williams JA; Melveger A
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Oct; 153(4):497-507. PubMed ID: 6792722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds.
    Van Winkle W; Hastings JC; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jan; 140(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1108243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strength retention of chromic gut and monofilament synthetic absorbable suture materials in joint tissues.
    Walton M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 May; (242):303-10. PubMed ID: 2495876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Absorbable suture materials for vascular anastomoses. Tensile strength and axial pressure studies using polyglycolic acid sutures.
    Ross G; Pavlides C; Long F; Kusaba A; Perlman M; Matsumoto T
    Am Surg; 1981 Dec; 47(12):541-7. PubMed ID: 6274234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical and clinical performance of a new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture.
    Rodeheaver GT; Beltran KA; Green CW; Faulkner BC; Stiles BM; Stanimir GW; Traeland H; Fried GM; Brown HC; Edlich RF
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1996; 6(3-4):181-98. PubMed ID: 10167360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of suture materials on healing wounds of the bladder.
    Hastings JC; Van Winkle W; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jun; 140(6):933-7. PubMed ID: 1129685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strength retention of chromic gut and synthetic absorbable sutures in a nonhealing synovial wound.
    Walton M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Jun; (267):294-8. PubMed ID: 1904335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of a new synthetic absorbable suture for ophthalmic surgery.
    Dunlap WA; Purnell WD; McPherson SD
    Adv Ophthalmol; 1976; 33():49-61. PubMed ID: 790910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vascular anastomoses with absorbable suture material: an experimental study.
    Schmitz-Rixen T; Storck M; Erasmi H; Schmiegelow P; Horsch S
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1991 May; 5(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 2064920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative study on biocompatibility and absorption times of three absorbable monofilament suture materials (Polydioxanone, Poliglecaprone 25, Glycomer 631).
    Molea G; Schonauer F; Bifulco G; D'Angelo D
    Br J Plast Surg; 2000 Mar; 53(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 10878837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat.
    Outlaw KK; Vela AR; O'Leary JP
    Am Surg; 1998 Apr; 64(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9544148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Tendon sutures with a new monofilament synthetic absorbable suture material (PDS-suture of 6-0 strength). Results of animal experiments].
    Albers W; Geldmacher J; Giedl H; Beyer W
    Chirurg; 1982 Mar; 53(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 6802585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Studies on the efficacy and safety of polydioxanone monofilament absorbable suture.
    Lerwick E
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1983 Jan; 156(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 6401197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo and in vitro degradation of monofilament absorbable sutures, PDS and Maxon.
    Metz SA; Chegini N; Masterson BJ
    Biomaterials; 1990 Jan; 11(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2105750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Absorbable polydioxanone monofilament in the surgery of the anterior segment of the eye].
    Desbordes JM; Hamard H; Pouliquen Y
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1983; 6(12):1007-10. PubMed ID: 6425394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A biologic comparison of polyglactin 910 and polyglycolic acid synthetic absorbable sutures.
    Craig PH; Williams JA; Davis KW; Magoun AD; Levy AJ; Bogdansky S; Jones JP
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jul; 141(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 1154207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evaluation of 7-0 Polyglactin 910 suture in cataract surgery.
    Blaydes JE
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1975; 6(4):99-104. PubMed ID: 1107925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.
    Bourne RB; Bitar H; Andreae PR; Martin LM; Finlay JB; Marquis F
    Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative evaluation of stiffness of commercial suture materials.
    Chu CC; Kizil Z
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 168(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2919353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.