These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38985075)

  • 1. Changes in the arch width and buccal corridor after fixed orthodontic treatment with Damon self-ligating system: premolar extraction vs. non-extraction.
    Bühling S; Schmied S; Eslami S; Brandt S; Plein N; Kopp S; Sayahpour B
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2024; 29(3):e2423159. PubMed ID: 38985075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of transverse dimensional and incisor changes between wide and narrow orthodontic archwires: a randomized controlled trial.
    Ahmed AS; Al-Nimri KS; Ahmed WS
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):338. PubMed ID: 38797781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 1: differences between premolar extraction and nonextraction treatment outcomes.
    Meyer AH; Woods MG; Manton DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 24485736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with Damon and conventional brackets: A retrospective analysis.
    Shook C; Kim SM; Burnheimer J
    Angle Orthod; 2016 Jul; 86(4):655-60. PubMed ID: 26390140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models.
    Cattaneo PM; Treccani M; Carlsson K; Thorgeirsson T; Myrda A; Cevidanes LH; Melsen B
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 22008302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of transverse maxillary dental arch width changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets in patients requiring premolar extraction - A randomised clinical trial.
    Bashir R; Sonar S; Batra P; Srivastava A; Singla A
    Int Orthod; 2019 Dec; 17(4):687-692. PubMed ID: 31466930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maxillary dental arch changes following the leveling and alignment stage with lingual and labial orthodontic appliances: a preliminary report of a randomized controlled trial.
    Khattab TZ; Hajeer MY; Farah H; Al-Sabbagh R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Sep; 15(5):561-6. PubMed ID: 25707826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transverse implications of maxillary premolar extraction in Class III presurgical orthodontic treatment.
    Lee SJ; Kim TW; Nahm DS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):740-8. PubMed ID: 16769492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A comparison of rapid palatal expansion and Damon appliance on non-extraction correction of dental crowding].
    Yu YL; Tang GH; Gong FF; Chen LL; Qian YF
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Jun; 17(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 18661061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances.
    Fleming PS; DiBiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19732667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Songra G; Clover M; Atack NE; Ewings P; Sherriff M; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 24785921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The timing of significant arch dimensional changes with fixed orthodontic appliances: data from a multicenter randomised controlled trial.
    Fleming PS; Lee RT; Mcdonald T; Pandis N; Johal A
    J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24269833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transversal changes in dental arches from non-extraction treatment with self ligating brackets.
    Maltagliati LA; Myiahira YI; Fattori L; Filho LC; Cardoso M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(3):39-45. PubMed ID: 24094010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study of dental arch widths: extraction and non-extraction treatment.
    Işik F; Sayinsu K; Nalbantgil D; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):585-9. PubMed ID: 16257988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficiency of self-ligating vs conventionally ligated brackets during initial alignment.
    Ong E; McCallum H; Griffin MP; Ho C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):138.e1-7; discussion 138-9. PubMed ID: 20691348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective clinical study of transverse development with orthodontics with self-ligating brackets.
    Mateu ME; Benítez-Rogé S; Calabrese D; Lumi M; Iglesias M; Méndez P; Solla M; Folco AA
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2020 Sep; 33(2):112-116. PubMed ID: 32920613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 2: attractiveness of the frontal facial smile in extraction and nonextraction outcomes.
    Meyer AH; Woods MG; Manton DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 24582021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An assessment of conventional and self-ligating brackets in Class I maxillary constriction patients.
    Atik E; Ciğer S
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):615-22. PubMed ID: 24423203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional analysis of the tooth movement and arch dimension changes in Class I malocclusions treated with first premolar extractions: a guideline for virtual treatment planning.
    Cho MY; Choi JH; Lee SP; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):747-57. PubMed ID: 21130334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Canine retraction and anchorage loss: self-ligating versus conventional brackets in a randomized split-mouth study.
    da Costa Monini A; Júnior LG; Martins RP; Vianna AP
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 24592906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.