These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38987715)

  • 1. An evaluation of sample size requirements for developing risk prediction models with binary outcomes.
    Pavlou M; Ambler G; Qu C; Seaman SR; White IR; Omar RZ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Jul; 24(1):146. PubMed ID: 38987715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimum sample size calculations for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a time-to-event outcome.
    Riley RD; Collins GS; Ensor J; Archer L; Booth S; Mozumder SI; Rutherford MJ; van Smeden M; Lambert PC; Snell KIE
    Stat Med; 2022 Mar; 41(7):1280-1295. PubMed ID: 34915593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of required sample size for external validation of risk models for binary outcomes.
    Pavlou M; Qu C; Omar RZ; Seaman SR; Steyerberg EW; White IR; Ambler G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2187-2206. PubMed ID: 33881369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome.
    Riley RD; Debray TPA; Collins GS; Archer L; Ensor J; van Smeden M; Snell KIE
    Stat Med; 2021 Aug; 40(19):4230-4251. PubMed ID: 34031906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of Firth-and logF-type penalized methods in risk prediction for small or sparse binary data.
    Rahman MS; Sultana M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):33. PubMed ID: 28231767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A note on estimating the Cox-Snell R
    Riley RD; Van Calster B; Collins GS
    Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(4):859-864. PubMed ID: 33283904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size requirements are not being considered in studies developing prediction models for binary outcomes: a systematic review.
    Dhiman P; Ma J; Qi C; Bullock G; Sergeant JC; Riley RD; Collins GS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Aug; 23(1):188. PubMed ID: 37598153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developing clinical prediction models when adhering to minimum sample size recommendations: The importance of quantifying bootstrap variability in tuning parameters and predictive performance.
    Martin GP; Riley RD; Collins GS; Sperrin M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Dec; 30(12):2545-2561. PubMed ID: 34623193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a continuous outcome.
    Archer L; Snell KIE; Ensor J; Hudda MT; Collins GS; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2021 Jan; 40(1):133-146. PubMed ID: 33150684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Erratum: High-Throughput Identification of Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato in Tomato using Seedling Flood Assay.
    J Vis Exp; 2023 Oct; (200):. PubMed ID: 37851522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size calculation for a stepped wedge trial.
    Baio G; Copas A; Ambler G; Hargreaves J; Beard E; Omar RZ
    Trials; 2015 Aug; 16():354. PubMed ID: 26282553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discrimination-based sample size calculations for multivariable prognostic models for time-to-event data.
    Jinks RC; Royston P; Parmar MK
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():82. PubMed ID: 26459415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cluster randomised crossover trials with binary data and unbalanced cluster sizes: application to studies of near-universal interventions in intensive care.
    Forbes AB; Akram M; Pilcher D; Cooper J; Bellomo R
    Clin Trials; 2015 Feb; 12(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 25475880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].
    ; ;
    Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 47(2):101-119. PubMed ID: 38309959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic models for identifying risk of poor outcome in people with acute ankle sprains: the SPRAINED development and external validation study.
    Keene DJ; Schlüssel MM; Thompson J; Hagan DA; Williams MA; Byrne C; Goodacre S; Cooke M; Gwilym S; Hormbrey P; Bostock J; Haywood K; Wilson D; Collins GS; Lamb SE
    Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(64):1-112. PubMed ID: 30474592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: PART II - binary and time-to-event outcomes.
    Riley RD; Snell KI; Ensor J; Burke DL; Harrell FE; Moons KG; Collins GS
    Stat Med; 2019 Mar; 38(7):1276-1296. PubMed ID: 30357870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria.
    van Smeden M; Moons KG; de Groot JA; Collins GS; Altman DG; Eijkemans MJ; Reitsma JB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2455-2474. PubMed ID: 29966490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.