These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3898796)

  • 1. Feasibility, reliability, and advantage of utilizing low contrast dose digital subtraction ventriculography in a conventional catheterization laboratory.
    Denardo SJ; Anderson DJ; Gould RG; Lipton MJ; Brundage BH; Ports TA
    Am Heart J; 1985 Sep; 110(3):631-6. PubMed ID: 3898796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of digital intravenous ventriculography with direct left ventriculography for quantitation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions.
    Norris SL; Slutsky RA; Mancini J; Ashburn WL; Gregoratos G; Peterson KL; Higgins CB
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 May; 51(8):1399-403. PubMed ID: 6846167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with low-contrast dose digital subtraction ventriculography.
    Mancini GB; Hodgson JM; Legrand V; Bates ER; Aueron FM; LeFree MT; Smith JS; Beauman GJ; Vogel RA
    Chest; 1985 May; 87(5):598-602. PubMed ID: 3886314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of the angiographic accuracy of digital left ventriculography.
    Nichols AB; Martin EC; Fles TP; Stugensky KM; Balancio LA; Casarella WJ; Weiss MB
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Jan; 51(1):224-30. PubMed ID: 6849261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Global left ventricular function: assessment with dual-source CT versus conventional ventriculography in a porcine model.
    Bruners P; Knackstedt C; Mahnken AH; Luhmann N; Das M; Fach C; Schmitz-Rode T; Günther RW; Kelm M; Mühlenbruch G
    Acta Cardiol; 2009 Jun; 64(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 19593940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intravenous left ventriculography utilizing digital subtraction technique.
    Nonogi H; Sasayama S; Sakurai T; Kawai C; Fujita M; Eiho S; Kuwahara M
    Jpn Circ J; 1984 Jun; 48(6):559-66. PubMed ID: 6376842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative assessment of regional left ventricular function by densitometric analysis of digital-subtraction ventriculograms: correlation with myocardial systolic shortening in dogs.
    Chappuis F; Widmann T; Guth B; Nicod P; Peterson KL
    Circulation; 1988 Feb; 77(2):457-67. PubMed ID: 3276410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital subtraction intravenous left ventricular angiography: comparison with conventional intraventricular angiography.
    Goldberg HL; Borer JS; Moses JW; Fisher J; Cohen B; Skelly NT
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Mar; 1(3):858-62. PubMed ID: 6338086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Digital subtraction ventriculography in determining global and regional left ventricular parameters compared to left catheterization cardiography].
    Eichstädt H; Langer M; Felix R
    Radiologe; 1984 Jun; 24(6):277-85. PubMed ID: 6382430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of left ventricular function by digital subtraction angiography: effect of dose and administration mode of contrast medium, and comparison with direct ventriculography].
    Kuribayashi S; Ootaki M; Matsuyama S; Kanemoto N; Furuya H
    J Cardiogr; 1985 Sep; 15(3):575-84. PubMed ID: 3915507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of left ventricular contractile pattern by intravenous digital subtraction ventriculography: comparison with cineangiography and assessment of interobserver variability.
    Nissen SE; Booth D; Waters J; Fassas T; DeMaria AN
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Dec; 52(10):1293-8. PubMed ID: 6359852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usefulness of digital subtraction left ventriculography in patients with ischemic heart disease: comparison with cineangiography.
    Paquet E; Bourassa MG; Lespérance J; Laurier J; Dyrda I; Lemarbre L; Bonan R; Joyal M; Corcos T
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Dec; 35(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 6396303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Densitometric assessment of regional left ventricular systolic function during graded ischemia in the dog by use of dual-energy digital subtraction ventriculography.
    McCollough CH; Miller WP; Van Lysel MS; Folts JD; Peppler WW; Albright DJ
    Am Heart J; 1993 Jun; 125(6):1667-75. PubMed ID: 8498309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of digital and radionuclide left ventriculography in patients at risk from conventional left ventriculography.
    Lemarbre L; Paquet E; Bourassa MG; Lespérance J; Dupras G; Laurier J
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Dec; 35(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 6396304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Left ventricular functional parameters using ECG-gated multidetector spiral CT in comparison with invasive ventriculography].
    Heuschmid M; Küttner A; Schröder S; Trebar B; Burgstahler C; Mahnken A; Niethammer M; Trabold T; Kopp AF; Claussen CD
    Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1349-54. PubMed ID: 14556103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relation of segmental wall motion to global left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction.
    Ohsuzu F; Boucher CA; Newell JB; Yasuda T; Gold HK; Leinbach RC; McKusick KA; Okada RD; Rosenthal S; Pohost GM; Strauss HW
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 May; 51(8):1275-81. PubMed ID: 6846155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the densitometric method of ejection fraction by direct digital subtraction left ventriculography.
    Shiba K; Nanki M; Hori H; Sakamoto N
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 May; 23(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 1863965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation of 10-milliliter digital subtraction ventriculograms compared with standard cineangiograms.
    Tobis JM; Nalcioglu O; Johnston WD; Seibert A; Roeck W; Iseri LT; Elkayam U; Henry WL
    Am Heart J; 1983 Jun; 105(6):946-52. PubMed ID: 6344605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility of ventricular function analysis by digital subtraction angiography.
    Takahashi M; Tsuchigame T; Tomiguchi S; Hayasaki K
    Comput Radiol; 1984; 8(6):331-40. PubMed ID: 6397326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative functional analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging].
    Koch K; Oellig F; Kunz P; Bender P; Oberholzer K; Mildenberger P; Hake U; Kreitner KF; Thelen M
    Rofo; 2004 Dec; 176(12):1786-93. PubMed ID: 15573290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.