These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

55 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3898813)

  • 1. Increased detection of staphylococcal bacteremia using an anti-microbial removal device.
    Carlson LG; Tenover FC; Plorde JJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 Oct; 84(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 3898813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Specimen volume versus yield in the BACTEC blood culture system.
    Plorde JJ; Tenover FC; Carlson LG
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Aug; 22(2):292-5. PubMed ID: 3897271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the antimicrobial removal device when used with the BACTEC blood culture system.
    Strand CL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Dec; 78(6):853-6. PubMed ID: 6756125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of bacteremia with the BACTEC 16B resin blood culture medium.
    DeGirolami PC; Eichelberger K; Siegel J
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1984 May; 81(5):643-6. PubMed ID: 6720630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of bacteremia in patients receiving antimicrobial therapy: an evaluation of the antimicrobial removal device and 16B medium.
    Doern GV; Gantz NM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Jul; 18(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 6350353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of a blood culture inoculation technique on detection of bacteremia by the BACTEC system.
    Carlson LG; Plorde JJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Sep; 16(3):590-2. PubMed ID: 6752196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved recovery of microorganisms from patients receiving antibiotics with the antimicrobial removal device.
    Peterson LR; Shanholtzer CJ; Mohn ML; Gerding DN
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Nov; 80(5):692-6. PubMed ID: 6356871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of new blood culture processing systems.
    Moody JA; Fasching CE; Shanholtzer CJ; Gerding DN; Peterson LR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Sep; 20(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 6386854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of an agar slide blood culture device with Bactec 6B for the detection of bacteremia.
    Berger SA; Battat A; Halperin E; Stein J; Dan M
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1987 Feb; 87(2):272-5. PubMed ID: 3544802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the Antibiotic Removal Device.
    Appleman MD; Swinney RS; Heseltine PN
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Feb; 15(2):278-81. PubMed ID: 7068823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic bottle to the isolator tube, BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle, and BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle and comparison of the BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle to the Isolator tube for recovery of bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi from blood.
    Vetter E; Torgerson C; Feuker A; Hughes J; Harmsen S; Schleck C; Horstmeier C; Roberts G; Cockerill F
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Dec; 39(12):4380-6. PubMed ID: 11724848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SIGNAL blood culture system for detection of bacteremia in neonates.
    Trombley C; Anderson JD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Nov; 25(11):2098-101. PubMed ID: 3320080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost effectiveness of the antibiotic removal device for processing blood cultures.
    de Silva MI; Qadri SM; Hood E
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1986 Sep; 78(9):857-61. PubMed ID: 3097333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is the antimicrobial removal device a cost-effective addition to conventional blood cultures?
    Munro R; Collignon PJ; Sorrell TC; Tomlinson P
    J Clin Pathol; 1984 Mar; 37(3):348-51. PubMed ID: 6421896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Routine subcultures shown to be unnecessary in radiometric detection of bacteremia using three media.
    Strand CL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Mar; 77(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 7041612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of oxoid signal with nonradiometric BACTEC NR-660 for detection of bacteremia.
    Schwabe LD; Randall EL; Miller-Catchpole R; Squires CI; Gottschall RL
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1990; 13(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 2331847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the BACTEC 16B medium in a cancer center.
    Tegtmeier BR; Vice JL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1984 Jun; 81(6):783-6. PubMed ID: 6731358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of non-radiometric BACTEC NR 660 system for routine detection of bacteremia.
    Farina C; Grigis A; Raglio A; Moioli F; Goglio A
    Boll Ist Sieroter Milan; 1989; 68(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 2491430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective study of the clinical performance of three BACTEC media in a modern emergency department: Plus Aerobic/F, Plus Anaerobic/F, and Anaerobic Lytic/F.
    Rocchetti A; Di Matteo L; Bottino P; Foret B; Gamalero E; Calabresi A; Guido G; Casagranda I
    J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Nov; 130():129-132. PubMed ID: 27623480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [An evaluation of antimicrobial removal device to isolate bacteria from bacteremic patients with hematological disorders].
    Nakazawa H; Okamoto S; Murase T; Yoshii Y; Aoki I; Toyama K; Ando Y; Uchida H
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1984 Jul; 37(7):1272-8. PubMed ID: 6436553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.